Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thank you for the confirmation. That is exactly what I think, make it natural and I am all good.

Let's say on my keyword If I take the 1 st 20 results of google they have an average number of words per page of 3000 words. On my page I only have 1500 words. Does it mean that the frequency of my related keywords should be half of what the others have ?

What about if I am over their frequency is it a problem also ?

Thank you,

My question:

When you have written good content and have a good internal linking structure, what else can you do to rank on high competition keywords (those that have a difficulty of around 50 for example). Just be patient and wait or is there anything else that can be done ?

Thank you,

It means in some way that big companies with strong PA and DA have an advantage on high volume keyword ?

Length of content does it mean that you need long content to compete ? or can you compete with better content even though it isn't long ?

Thank you,

Coud it be that content of the same quality takes less time to rank when there is a less competition ?

I understand about all the other variable but see that you aren't suppose to ask for links but you content is suppose to attract links it means that once you publish your content you need to wait and for some keyword you might need to wait less and for some more for your content to start being visible.

Does strength of a domain really matter because I have seen webpages with almost no PA and DA outrank page with strong PA and DA.

It is on long tail queries but still, it seems that content matter a lot those days. Link helps but only make a difference if you are trying to rank on SEO for longer queries it seems to matter less.

Thank you,

Hello,

Is there a correlation between the keyword difficult and the time it takes to rank ?

In other words let's say I try to rank for  the keyword "seo" and it is going to take 2 years to rank 1 st whereas if I go for "best seo tools in 2018" and it takes just 2 weeks ?

Thank you,

Hello,

Does AMP have ranking benefits ?

Should I just AMP my post or all the pages of my website, product page, homepage etc...

Thank you,

That is what I did so I guess I am good. Now, I just need to create nice blog pages that satisfy the user  and link to the correct pages so that the content between the 2 pages I link benefits the pages.

Thank you,

Thank you that answers my question.

Thank you for your reply Igor,

From what I understand you are saying that it isn't worth my time creating blog pages to link internally to the pages that I want to boost. It seems that an external link is better or that breadcrumbs will do the job, correct ?

How about one pages that are hard to rank on because of high demand won't maybe 10 or 15 internal link via my blog help ?

Or is is better to have a few very good contextual links across my site ?

Hello,

Is it still devaluated by google ? It seems that on mobile it isn't anymore but what about desktops ?

Thank you,

Hi,

I currently have built my website with internal links to boost my category pages (the ones that are the most important with the most traffic). Is the way to go or nowadays or doesn't it matter what pages you boost. I beleive  what I did is some sort of "page rank sculpting" but is it still useful ? or I should I link natural across my website even though some pages will get a boost and some won't ?

The link that I have are at the bottom of my content (not in the footer) but at the bottom of the page next to each other ? does they count or is it really bad to have them that way ?

I have a blog and I was wondering if when I link from my blog page for example about "Barolo" to my page about "Piedmont" if I should also link from my page about "Piedmont" to my Barolo page or if the link only has to go one way from my blog / Barolo page to my piedmont page to boost Piedmont.

Thank you,

Hello,

With the new mobile indexing 1 st do search engine (google) give as much value to content in tabs and no visible in the 1 st place as content which is visible on the page ?

Thank you,

Thank you for the confirmation. I thought it was but wasn't a 100 % sure.

It is based on moz keyword tool. 5 most relevant related keyword, 1 least relevant.

I know it needs to stay as natural as possible but sometimes it is hard if you stick with the original keyword as a secondary keyword and one that a relevancy of 5. Not to sounds spammy is it better to use a keyword that might have relevancy of 3 instead of 5 but that doesn't have the original keyword in it ?

Thank you also for the clarification about the bullet points.

I understand that it is 2 different topics but you can't you cover the topic of SEO with a sub topic that is SEO tools ?

Thank you,

Thank you, I guess as long as it reads normally, it is best as you mentioned.

Good to know, thank you

Ok, thank you.