Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Papp, What you are asking is the million dollar question... there's no right answer. To get traffic you need basically 2 things: A great Website. And excellent content (whatever the niche is, it could also be the "best products" if you were selling something, or the "best service"). The real question here is: do your websites have what they need to rank in the SERPs? I'm quite sure, that 10 - 30 "seo'ed" articles are not even near enough unless those articles that you published are something really extraordinary that you can't find anywhere else, say a medical research for example. My advice? Take one of the sites first, and try to do something amazing. If you are able to monetize that first one with AdSense, then you would have learned what is needed to do it with the other sites.

Hi Sebastian - unfortunately, I'm not sure there's much help I can give you on your question (I'll explain why below), but I did want to pop in to say that I'm worried about the goals you're attempting to achieve and how they conflict with what Google and its users are seeking from websites. The build + flip model of creating an exact match domain (which have been trending down in Google's results and no longer provide much benefit) along with the concept of hosting many sites and simply publishing articles without regard for the quality or the broader mission or the end-user's goals and experience in mind is dangerous. Years ago, those types of systems worked and today, they can still work ocassionally and temporarily, but given the amount of effort required, I'm certain you could find other ways to accomplish far greater financial returns and give the web something truly excellent - something Google wants to rank and people want to visit, rather than a gallery of article-heavy built-to-flip sites. The last point I'll add is that the links you might find to sites like these are not going to be high-quality, editorially given endorsements from trusted sources. They're far more likely to be the kind of links that get you into trouble. And, generally speaking, the Moz Q+A community doesn't focus on those and may not have great recommendations for how to acquire them. That said, we welcome all kinds, and I wish you luck whatever you choose.

Hi, The two most popular cacheing plugins for WordPress are probably: http://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-super-cache/ and the w3total cache one you mention. Although they both have the same aim, the way they go about it is quite different.  Depending on your technical knowledge you may find Super Cache easier to set up and manage than w3total. For what it's worth I doubt you'll find a plugin that is better than these two, but you may benefit from experimenting with both to see which suits your host better. I'd suggest that if either plugin working on a standalone basis is not making a difference, then you may have issues with your host that need addressing.

now is ok, I can use it succesfuly, thanks for your response Abe.

Hi Papp I think "best" is somewhat objective - first of all - are you looking for tools for keyword discovery or more like metric gathering or more like management & analysis. Those are all somewhat different things and some tools are better then others. In my opinion there's no one tool that can do all the valuable discovery for you. So I end up using combinations of; KW Planner Google Trends Google Correlate Mergewords Analytics and Webmaster Tools SEM Rush Ubersuggest I detail a bunch of methods here: http://www.slideshare.net/evolvingseo/unusual-uses-of-17-free-tools-for-keyword-discovery Then there's the metric gathering and management - which to me is a whole other ballgame than just research. I spent a month researching Keyword Management and Metric tools - and I normally wouldn't drop a link here to myself but this is the most complete list I know of: http://www.evolvingseo.com/2013/09/26/keyword-research-management-tools/

Hi Sebastian,If you're willing to share the URL, we may be able to troubleshoot. No worries if you can't or want to keep it private, but otherwise it may be hard to diagnose without actually looking at the site/URLs. Cheers