You could try using Schema to mark up the address on your website.

Does it show up when [brand name] is searched on it's own?

Chris is absolutely right.

Here's a tip: For each Google+ Location create a separate landing page on your website to associate it with and in the 'website' section on Google+ use the landing page URL, instead of simply your domain name. This is standard best practice when dealing with multiple business locations.

Wesley,

Have you tried adding the suite number to your listing? I would try to add that and then also build more citations around the web with the exact same Name, Address (with suite #) and Phone Number. Use the MozLocal tool to find opportunities.

Also, when dealing with multiple locations, you should set up specific pages on your website (let's call them 'location landing pages') and associate those to each corresponding Google+ page. I see that you have the 'thetattaway.com' listed as the website for both Google+ pages I could find.

100% agree. It's going to take some time. Right now Google doesn't really understand that term as a brand name and the search results are a bit wacky in my opinion. You shouldn't have a problem moving up.

The more backlinks you earn with 'primepair' as the anchor text, the better off you will be.

Good luck!

Keszi is correct.

This happens frequently with WordPress and having brand names in the title tag. Google will often push a brand name (or whatever it believes is the brand name) to the beginning of the title tag.

Sorry I missed this!

If you have your website architecture set up well you can always request Google to index a page and all pages that it links to. You'll see this option when you click the Submit to index button. You won't have to submit a substantial amount of individual pages this way.

I personally would keep an eye the pages of most value. These are the pages you are optimizing for that show up in the search results and are generating traffic.

Hope this helps.

I'd say go with whatever you believe is best for the user. For e-commerce, you most likely do not need the physical address to be on every page, but I guess there could be some exceptions. I do believe you _should _have it somewhere, like you mentioned having it on a contact page.

Go with your gut!

If you have internal links pointing to the page with the new/updated content Google will eventually find it, however, the quickest way to have this happen is to request a crawl in Google Webmaster Tools.

Under Crawl > Fetch as Google

Once the status of the page loads, you should see a button labeled Submit to index. Click this to submit the page to be indexed.

There are free tools available to find out the last time Google indexed (crawled) a specific page. I personally use the free SEO Book Toolbar. I believe Moz's free toolbar does this as well but I could be wrong.

Can you provide the URL?

Grobro is most likely right. If you have an opening

tag before your

tag, the closing

should be after your closing .

Hi Thomas,

Just wanted to chime in. That's a good question, and I don't know of such data that is out there, but you could always use Google's Keyword Planner tool to get average volume of searches for the branded search terms that Google is suggesting in auto-complete.

You can also use this tool here to find suggested search terms to look at volume. The terms this tool pulls are actually just what Google suggests, aka auto-complete terms.

Good luck!

Here's a great article on SEO for Amazon: http://moz.com/blog/amazon-seo-organic-search-ranking-factors

Great! No problem

No problem!

Hi there,

It's very common for Google to display this type of information for someone searching a brand name, specifically one that has a Google+ listing set up like in your case.

Google tries to show the most relevant information as per the user's intent. So, for example, if someone is searching 'marketing clinic melbourne' all of the results shouldn't be specific to just one brand, even if your website is showing up #1.

Does this make sense?

The most important thing that would affect SEO in this case is whether or not that hidden content can be indexed. If it's HTML text Google _should _be able to read it, but it's not a guarantee.

If you have Google Webmaster Tools set up, use the Fetch as Google tool under **Crawl **in the sidebar. This will show what Google is seeing when it crawls your webpage.

Hope this helps!

Links via social media are traditionally "no follow". Facebook and Twitter follow this convention.

In short, yes, off-page SEO for local listings is similar to off-page for your website.

When deciding to link to your website or a local listing page I always consider the user first. There may be instances when it makes more sense to link to your Google+ page instead of website, for example, to provide location information / directions quicker.

You should definitely put some effort into creating backlinks to your Google+ page but from my experience, as far as ranking goes, the authority (and amount of quality links) to your web domain is a greater factor.

Hope this steers you in the right direction!

Hi there,

Q1. I would monitor the amount of links you add and also make sure that you aren't overusing the same anchor text. This could potentially come up as a red flag to Google even if the links are quite natural.

Q2. That technique does sound a bit spammy. If you are trying hard to relate back to your website just for links, this too might be seen as shady by Google and other participants in the forum. I would continue to contribute but only mention / link to your website when it's absolutely necessary to make your point.

Hope this was helpful!

Hi Wayne,

When dealing with multiple locations, it's best to link location specific Google+ pages to the location pages you have set up on your website.

Laura had great answer for a similar question here: http://moz.com/community/q/how-to-best-use-schema-tags-for-multiple-locations

Hope this helps!