Welcome to the Q&A Forum

If you remember before 5 years ago all urls was unencrypted in SERP and lot of tools using this for capturing "keywords" and linking them to pages. After they introduce this in 2010 they begin rollout in few years and today only way to see keywords is in SearchConsole. Of course encryption is for "to improve your search quality and to provide better service". Original text can be seen here. Please note "provide better service" there. This is tricky!

So imagine that you search for moz and here is actual URL i can see now:
https://www.google.bg/search?q=moz&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=4wNVVpnZBYGoUZiXh4AG
you can definitely see keyword there in ?q=moz now first result is Moz.com and it's URL is:
https://www.google.bg/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjenMnUq6rJAhXIRBQKHXuVCcUQFggfMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmoz.com%2F&usg=AFQjCNHNW83KUfvLcZOMILlYW49NobxUig&sig2=nOVvQ05KIPrGB3XFAFmIGgAs you can clearly see - there isn't keyword anymore but everything comes with encrypted data (ved, usg, sig2). This link /url is actual redirector that count your click on specific result and position.

Now if i click on 1st result and go in Moz.com i can scroll down and i find "this isn't MOZ i'm looking for" so within some time (few seconds) i will return to SERP. This is actual "dwell time" and bounce back to SERP. It's negative signal because it's show to Google that result he return for first place isn't correct with human verification. Now back on same SERP i can see Moz in Wikipedia:
https://www.google.bg/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=19&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjenMnUq6rJAhXIRBQKHXuVCcUQFghhMBI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FMoz_(marketing_software)&usg=AFQjCNGCgqmsKNIdaZdGrbugf8bJk6NhTg&sig2=jS-vt68NFtD5YhgSV4lTGwIf i click this and i doesn't have return to SERP anymore this give to Google enough to calculate bounce rate for this site (only to return in SERP) so give Wikipedia some "goal completition". And time for next search can be used to calculated "time on site".

And since all searches are encrypted they knows when specific user search for something and when they make new search based on already returned data. Example is "Napoleon". This can be anything - french emperor, movie, cake, drink and other things. So now i can do subsequent search "Napoleon height". This is example how one search can give me enough information to do another refined search. Other good example can be "32 us president". Then i can type "franklin d roosevelt height".

This was explained much better in closing MozCon 2015 presentation "SEO in a Two Algorithm World ":
http://www.slideshare.net/randfish/onsite-seo-in-2015-an-elegant-weapon-for-a-more-civilized-marketer
and you should see it. There also shown few tests inside with terrific results.

@mods - maybe respost from here: https://moz.com/community/q/doctype-language-declaration-problem-2
I'll drop answer here too just in case you will delete old post.

Yes - iso-8859-15 is very outdated encoding. Validator suggest that you should use UTF-8.I believe that this is also SEMRush issue too.

Fix just wrote this:

and bug will be fixed.

I think that you should check is this real visit or fake one. Check HTTP access logs about such referrer and see in Analytics (or other website analytics software that you used). Also visit URL where backlink should be. Then:

• In case of link to hacked pages - disavow ASAP. Bad guys make backlinks to hacked webpages to get higher position in SERP. But this could change your linking profile. And in some situation you may face Penguin algo filter.
• In case of link to other pages and source look shady - disavow ASAP. This could be even revenge for removed hack. Also can bring Penguin.
• In case of link to non-existing link i.e. bot traffic - leave. This is case when bot make "fake visit" tricking Analytics to count it. And webmasters go to inspect source. This is "curiosity driven visit", but messing your Analytics statistics.
• In case of regular link that is relevant - keep it. Example - i have link from Pakisanian forum about people discussing something like type X vs. type Y. And someone share link from mine site explaining "here is difference between them" in article that is exactly about their discussion.

So until you didn't see original source can be anything. Also please check question and answers here: 
https://moz.com/community/q/is-there-value-in-disavowing-links-if-you-there-is-no-google-penalty 
so disavowing isn't tool that you only use in case of penalty. You can use it even w/o penalty to make link profile clean as possible.

I believe that noone can give you answer. But let's try!

US population is 318.9 million (2014). UK population is 64.1 million (2013). This make very rough 383 million.
Hispanic or latino population in US is approx 54M. http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/populations/REMP/hispanic.html

Now let's count all spanish talking in the world. This is Spain + whole South/Latin America except Brazil (they talk in Portuguese). Latin America is 626M (2015 est.), Brazil is 200M (2013) and Spain is 46.77M (2014). So rough calculation there will be 472.77M.

As you can see with this translation you can effective double your potential audience. As you can see i talk about "potential audience" because there are many things can goes wrong. But maybe in long term (this is shoot in the dark!) this can double (or even more) your traffic in best scenario. Or (again shoot in the dark) this can bring you 15% increase (US-hispanic+UK/US+UK population). Of course both are very rough assumptions.

This was example with GA. I believe that they use dwell time and next or subsequent searches for this.

Because they can't fight against shopping cart abandonment's and other issues. So they have some as benchmark against other sites. If your metrics are above average in your industry then it's great. If your metrics are weak - you're in trouble. You can see benchmarking in Google Analytics. So whatever you do just try to make better metrics than them. Example - i just have seen that some of mine sites have pages/session 1.40 vs 2.99 in benchmark. Also mine session duration is 1:32 vs. 2:19 in benchmark.

Similar metrics are in PPC too - you need to be above the average for better positions, prices and conversions.

I know that all this explanation can sound little bit messy... but this is question all SEO specialists think about these days. If you know the answers you can become millionaire and retire quick.

1. Yes
2. No
3. No

I'm doing same on mine own site but with renaming files. And i found that if i rename file w/o 301 then i suddenly get lot of 404 traffic. When i proper 301 i keep traffic normal. Because i get good positions in Bing images and Google images.

Marieke,

yes this is perfect example how bit.ly should be used. It's not dumb because you didn't use for some SEO purpose. I also seen bit.ly sharing on Viber, WhatsApp, Telegram or text messages. Because space there is limited and sender looking for maximal efficient usage of message.

That URL will be indexed if you place it somewhere on internet where can be crawled. Like on your blog or if someone other do this. That's why it can't be seen on report - because no one knows that it even exists.

There is just one small issue. IF you add + after bit.ly URL you can see it's statistics:
https://bitly.com/2rCyvkP+
so right now anyone on internet can see your clicks.

I hope that this helps!

Peter

301 can take weeks or months dependent how large is your website. With site move this happen for days. And site move have "undo" function.

First - calm down and see with attention this screen.

This screen in OSE "Inbound links" show all types of links - this page only, sub-domain level, domain level, internal, external, redirects, follow, nofollow, etc. In order to filter some of them you need to use three drop downs. Also internal links isn't spam signal.

So score 5/17 meaning:

• Low MozTrust or MozRank score
• Large site with few links
• Site link diversity is low

So first can be fixed with few more links over internet. This will heal also second issue. The most interesting is third - you need to play with anchor text to make something called "perfect link profile". I'm not going to explain here what this mean but in theory you should link your site with different anchors with different links. This can be image links, "click here", "visit site" and many other.

I think that read your question few days ago about some site issues as i remember. So you need to make technical audit of your site and his link profile before proceed with link building.

PS: Also please check Rand explanation about Moz Spam Score:
https://moz.com/blog/spam-score-mozs-new-metric-to-measure-penalization-risk
https://moz.com/blog/understanding-and-applying-mozs-spam-score-metric-whiteboard-fridayhttps://moz.com/help/guides/research-tools/open-site-explorer/spam-analysis
and see what are your issues compared to other. I'm not paying customer and unfortunately i can't see this report for your site.

Seems as related to AJAX crawler escaped fragment.

You should see why bot is trying to crawl normal pages with deprecated method. Please see "incoming links" to this 404 in SearchConsole to see where is root of this problem and fix it.

I report this last night to mods and in Twitter. Before 12 hours...

I think that this one is best:
https://moz.com/ugc/accidental-seo-tests-how-301-redirects-are-likely-impacting-your-brand
(i can describe same, but this is article with diagrams and lot explanation).

Also think about this let we have two pages - PageA about Coca Cola and PageB about Pepsi Cola. Let both pages have content optimized for them and have ranking. If we 301 PageA to PageB do you think that PageB will getting same positions about "Coca Cola"? That's right - will be lost positions because content is different.

Of course there is special case when you get ranking for some keywords with anchors even if such content doesn't exist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb

That's why when wise people talk for about "over 200 ranking factors" they're damn right!

I used more sophisticated but it's look similar.

You need to get all links from SearchConsole, OSE, Ahrefs, Majestic and Webmeup. From this list only Ahrefs require payment but you can find someone with subscription to get backlinks. Then dump everything in mega spreadsheet with URL only and remove duplicates. Later you need to use Marie Haynes formulas:
https://moz.com/blog/5-spreadsheet-tips-for-manual-link-audits
and create list of domains with backlinks.

Domains with TF <1 and ref. domains <5 can be disavowed w/o even looking on them. They're trash.

And later you need to do manual inspection link-by-link and domain-by-domain to see is it legit or doesn't. You also can look whois data and how Google sees this site using cache. I also don't like the private whois registrations. And if there is difference between crawler see vs. user - "this isn't domain i'm looking for".

Of course this is time intensive method. But you can split to few persons (using different IPs!) to speedup checking. One sheet is filled then you can see who to disavow or keep. And next recheck you only need to add new backlinks and do check only on them.

I can't see this because just within minutes i push mine content to social networks - G+, Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

No.

First Google isn't real time processing and if you do changes now can take few weeks before seeing results. Since we don't know when you make changes only can guess about this.

Second - your internal link building need improvements:
http://www.conny-ehm.de/bewerbungsfotos-freiburg.html
linked with anchor texts as (how many times): Bewerbungsfotos (12), Mehr (1), Bewerbungbilder (1), Bewerbungs-Shooting.Warum? Internal anchor text is important too!

Third - this local page doesn't have links from outside (internet). Don't forget also anchor text.

Forth - you have BUG in canonical!

see on href= quote is different! It's “ (unicode) but should be ". FIX IT ASAP!

Six - your text "Bewerbungsfotos Freiburg" on subpage can be seen in Title, Meta KW, 2 times in alt text, in footer. How you expect to rank without single type "Bewerbungsfotos Freiburg" inside of text?
Please read this about some on-page tricks:
https://moz.com/blog/7-advanced-seo-concepts

I think that that's all.

Did you block AWS IP range or Mozbot? Or did you applied some firewall policy?

PM me your URL so i can take a look on server and network level with different tools.

Yes,

mine site comes with this sitemap:
http://www.mobiliodevelopment.com/post-sitemap.xml
http://www.mobiliodevelopment.com/page-sitemap.xml

They're automated generated from Yoast SEO plugin for WordPress.

PS: Just right click and select "View Source"

Can you try ping sitemap? Because some CDNs (i'm don't know your infrastructure) cache files for few hours and bots sometime get cached but old versions.

You also can try pinging specific pages. If you're scary for spam just use mine SEOPingler and bot comes within seconds.

Links is "All links to this page including internal, external, followed, and nofollowed".
It's same number as if drop this URL into OSE where it's count as "Total Links"

I check and seems that your site is OK from mine side - GCE, Amazon EC2 and in Eastern Europe. There are few issues - SSL3, weak DH and files as: https://www.pouyasazan.org/IT-news/25876/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/css/tooltipster.css (breaking relative and absolute path), also no 404 page because everything return "200 OK" (soft 404). But they isn't critical for your site working and it works. Server works and i just hammering it with many requests.

Please contact with Moz on mail here: help@moz.com or fill form there: https://moz.com/help/contact/pro to investigate your situation.