Welcome to the Q&A Forum

If those pages are still ranking in the top 50 for one of the keywords in your campaign, they will continue to be graded. The on-page tool automatically grades pages in the top 50, giving you the opportunity to do a little work to improve a page that is already starting to rank. The fact that they have an F doesn't make any difference to anything.

However, you might not want sub-optimal pages hanging around--you could either redirect them to an appropriate new page (301) or else just 404 them (not found). If you have already done this, it might just need more time for Moz to catch up.

As far as the links, which links do you mean? Sometimes people do link to sites using links with extra, unnecessary characters.

I just checked that link in Screaming Frog and it is 200.

Do they use canonical URLs on their website? Do the cross-posted blog posts have canonicals that point back to the originating site? If so, the duplicate content should not harm their website and their website should rank above the bigger players for their content (though not necessarily--Google works in mysterious ways).

In general, it is a good idea to keep your best, fresh content on your own website but sometimes it can be good to get the added exposure of a high-traffic website, assuming that it is clear where the content originated.

The keyword tool can do this. Research tools > Keyword and ranking tools > Keyword difficulty . You can enter up to 20 words at a time.

The reason that duplicate content is an issue is because Google will eventually drop one of the duplicates from its index, and if you have both page A and page B canonicalized to page B, Google will eventually drop page A in favor of page B.

If you are concerned that page A is not being crawled, you can use Fetch as Google to ask Google to recrawl it. But if A is not being crawled and B is, again B will be chosen over A in the results pages.

I see something similar; in my case it's because we get less traffic on weekends, so there is a weekly sawtooth. Do your dips correspond to weekends?

If you have set pages to noindex, then Google will not index them.

Are you saying that you have other pages besides the ones you marked noindex that are not getting indexed?

You have 191px of padding on top of your div "inner-page-wrap has-no-sidebar clearfix", with the grey box and photo of three people in it. Eliminating that will eliminate whitespace above it.

Monthly. You can track them here. https://moz.com/products/api/updates

I agree with Ryan, doing it all on one page with the different number of days/itineraries sectioned out is the way I'd go.

First, a page actually can rank well for more than one search term, especially when they are so closely related.

And second, what is the point of optimizing different pages for different numbers of days and then canonicalizing them to the ten day trip? The canonical indicates that only the ten-day page should be indexed, so who cares whether the shorter trip pages are optimized or not? They won't be findable in the SERPs.

Lastly, there is no penalty as such for duplicate content. Google just decides which page is the most useful to show and the others drop out of the index. If your pages are very similar, Google may well make the decision for you and drop some of them out of the index.

Google Analytics has the option to capture demographic and interests information about website users. It is not as granular as what you are describing, but might give you a direction in which to start looking.

What Google will show in the search results is partly based on what the person searched for. What was your search? (I see, based on the bolding, that it included camera and filters--were there any other terms?)

Also, what happens if you do an anonymous search?  If you are logged in, you might be seeing things based on your history.

Here is a link with information from Google that might help.

1. Google Analytics/WebmasterTools/Adwords
2. Screaming Frog
3. Moz
4. SEMRush
5. LinkResearchTools

Wish: Majestic/Ahrefs

What search are you doing when you see the incorrect result? If I search for absoluteautomation.ca, sensaphone400 I see the price in CAD. If I just do the search with absoluteautomation, sensaphone400 [no .ca] I get the price in USD. [I am in the US.] The .com site has a higher ranking than the .ca site--could you be seeing the .com results?

Sometimes people make pages like that as landing pages for PPC or other types of campaigns and then abandon them.

I found one like that on one of my sites once by noticing that a page I did not recognize was getting a lot of search traffic--I ended up integrating it into my structure with a new URL, and 301 redirecting the old URL to that new page.

If you think those might be good pages for you, different from similar pages you might already have, you can update them and do that as well.

If they are not especially useful to you, you could just 301 them to the most similar pages. [Are they getting traffic? I think Google must see something in them, if they are still indexed.] They probably wouldn't do any harm if you just leave them, but I'd take care of them anyway.

The first thing that occurs to me is if they are serving for similar terms anyway, would it make sense to combine the sites? Or is there some business reason you cannot? A combined site would be easier to maintain and would be stronger (more links, content, traffic, etc.), which could help ranking overall.

I agree with Highland that this type of solution probably won't be your best choice.

How much of your traffic is actually mobile? Rand Fishkin shared this post on Google+, saying that Moz wasn't worried about making the deadline since they have very little mobile traffic.

Also, in this discussion here in Moz, Peter Meyers posted that this update is page-based, so if you have a smaller number of pages that are very mobile-crucial, perhaps you could fix those first, and then work on the larger fix for your website.

You can use Majestic for free for sites you own. [You will have to verify your site.] Very useful!

If you are using it in a normal way, for good usability and not to be deceptive, you should be OK. (Matt Cutts on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsW8E4dOtRY )

My redirects from old domains show up as back links, which makes sense--it is a case of a link from one domain to a different domain. So if you redirected all of those pages to your new site, you'd see a lot of links. As far as why it would be more pages than you had, take a look at the links and see what they are. Maybe you had different versions of pages that are showing up as separate links?