that site - http://expertfreelancer.net - gets me a 404...
might be the reason you're not getting many signups?

Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
that site - http://expertfreelancer.net - gets me a 404...
might be the reason you're not getting many signups?

Justian....if it "looks like" keyword stuffing to you then it is!
Google will see it that way too, eh!
Bad practices, I'd say....

Mikes drill-down is especially apropos of this whole change....do click to see what I mean, eh!
And thanks Miriam - nice nice catch!
Yup...Doc Marie has it right...that "thin" layer too aint exactly so thin!!!
Especially when you remember that Competitors love to report you!
So do read Miriams' great post and then look over the link on Marie's post too...

ABSOLUTELY great Egol advice here.....especially on the 'variance' you'd find by filtering thru common counsel for the 'style' that you like for you and yours....
Read...learn...test...then rank...and repeat!
Would totally agree here - looks and smells like one of those "well past their best before date" link machine models...so stay the hell outta their world!
What Egol said is quite true...this has been debated for years....but those of us who don't care about the validations rank our own or our clients sites quite nicely.
Oh sidebar - you'd be so surprised to learn what kind of HUGE well known sites won't validate either....
how are the NAPs on both...are they totally diff and distinctly linked to each location?
oh - NAP means name address and phone # - I have no exp in the UK with phone #s but Google is damn smart at sussing out when a 'local' phone # aint so local here in NA...
try looking at the LOCAL search ranking factor study here at Moz for more info...here

ALWAYS brand last...keyword/keyword phrase first, left to right as Eng is written works best, eh!
Have NEVER heard any variations on same - well, from anyone that counts in the SEO world that is....

Loved SMX - have been to many, spoken too and when you rub shoulders with the SEO gurus you read about all day long, it's a great way to bond with those folks...you lean while you're there!
Patrick Sexton is a pretty well known "tool" dude in the SEO world - I think if I remember correctly, he was David Mihm's original partner for the getlisted puppy...
That said, give this URL a try to one of his great online tools to audit EVERY image on a webpage and show you what needs attention when it comes to SEO for images...
:-0
Jim
Search for that user name here at moz....he's very very well known & respected in the SEO world - but usually will NOT work for others....
I really have NO idea if Egol - who's over there I believe would even consider an SEO contract as I believe he works for himself...but if he does and you can contact him - he'd be the SEO god you need...

WAY too little info here to make a definitive counsel - but if you think - believe - know that this site will one day "be" a player in that channel - then I'd say YES! As it grows, so grows the link-juice you'd receive and the longer you're a "part" of that IBL type linking, you're going to be a happy camper.
That said - MONITOR it all the time - save the URL where the link is and then revisit it as should that site "go south" and lose any real value - it'd then be on that disavow list....this is good advice I believe for ALL IBLs...save 'em in Excel and then revisit to prove value....
As Egol so succinctly put it....this is the way life is on the interweb!!!

Simple google for "title length for best seo" would show that after about 55/58 chars your title tag drops off...and I noted that your own is 69 chars...that's "old" thinking.
Search here at moz for title length etc and I remember that there are a couple of great blog posts on just how to craft same...
Yes. It matters...above the fold has proved time and time again that this is the best way to establish authority/trust based on UIX principles where conversions matter!
Also, I do not follow you with this comment "...a section based approach with copy further down the page..."
Can you provide some examples of HIGH ranking URLs with that type of 'below the fold' UIX?
???
Do you mean a plugin that would automatically "look" for links to your site?
Or a plugin that would "link" your own interior pages?
Sorry for my confusion but I'm not following you here?
Yeah, that kinda display trick is transparent to the googleBot....i.e. it's for users not bots...so it's not an issue...use them as you see fit...
