Ditto. I saw a competitor use PRweb, and was tempted. However, I felt the potential for spammy links not the direction I wanted my SEO to go in.
This just reinforces the issue.
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Ditto. I saw a competitor use PRweb, and was tempted. However, I felt the potential for spammy links not the direction I wanted my SEO to go in.
This just reinforces the issue.
I wouldn't worry about the same H2 tag. Usually I do a slight variation for my H2, or use some additional filler words. But I see nothing wrong with what you have.
Be interested if anyone has differing views though.
Mine migrated within 24 hours. You might want to start a new thread and hope for an answer from support.
I would say it is unnatural, and therefore any links you have should be no-followed.
No we have not forgotten that, but it is not just about PA. PA comes with time, and effort on all the other things you should be doing as an SEO.
I used to use Elegant themes for templates, but now find that themeforest has much more feature rich themes.
I suggest you take a look. Many of the themes there are responsive.
Just following on from what David Liu said about Ahrefs, you might find this a very interesting read:
http://www.matthewwoodward.co.uk/experiments/ahrefs-majestic-seo-1-million-domain-showdown/
That being said, I believe Majestic found more backlinks here, although as you will see in that article there is a difference between links reported, and live links.
I wouldn't overly worry yet. The SEO industry and various tools will adapt, like they have adapted to everything else.
I believe I read somewhere that data (or at least some of it) is still available to adwords customers, and of course there is data from bing etc.
There is bound to be a bit of a reaction now, but as people adapt it will soon be business as usual.
Why not just only show the latest relevant entries on your RSS feed?
No problems at my end, but I think the ranking service I use is crawler based.
The days of republishing content are over. The most successful aggregation sites either rewrite, or add their own spin (i.e curation) of the content.
See this video by Matt Cutts on the issue:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7sfUDr3w8I
But of course, this will never be as good as original content.
Yeh, I also use Ahrefs \ Majestic in combination with Moz for this reason, although I only subscribe to those services when needed.
If you post a link to your url I will give you the code you need. If you don't want to post it, just PM it.
I use another web based tracker that checks the rankings daily. I guess I will find out tomorrow, and will update this thread then. I am not sure they use an API though. TBH I didn't realise they used Api's for this.
Also Mike, you may want to have a look a Ahrefs.com. I have just checked it and there are alot more backlinks showing up you need to look at. If you google for a coupon, you can get it half price, or just get a refund within 7 days. It can be useful for these sort of situations, even though Moz does alot more analytics etc.
No worries. This is another good article that I found is quite good:
http://moz.com/ugc/should-domain-authority-be-used-to-determine-which-backlinks-to-remove
OK, I have had a quick look and I do see some potential problems:
Check that page. You will see this particular term (Holtorf Medical Group) seems overly used, thanks to a few sitewide sidebar links for example realitynibs.com
You should either get those sitewide links nofollowed, or removed,... or failing that dissavowed. There may be other examples in that link, but I believe that is a potential cause of your problems. I am seeing sitewide links be the cause of alot of problems lately.
Also if you go down the dissavow route, this might be worth reading: http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2271695/Disavowing-Links-Google-Says-Use-a-Machete-Not-a-Scalpel
Obviously, be careful not to remove any decent high quality links.
It is very hard without seeing the site. But check for low quality content \ duplicate content. Look at your link profiles for spammy links (over optimised anchor texts, low quality links etc).
You'll just need to do a bit of research into I am afraid. If you want to post your link we can see if something obvious sticks out.
That's the date of the last big Google Panda update (22nd). I think you have your answer.