Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi there,

Thanks for reaching out. Chris is pretty much correct. The limit is due to the bandwidth issues of running those reports for each keyword.

While you may only be interested in the percentage, the report itself uses the SERP and the metrics for each of those pages to generate that percentage. Unfortunately that's a processor intense function so doing so many at once would take a long time and would likely time out.

I hope that answers your question.
Cheers,
Joel.

Hey Marc,

Thanks for reaching out. We are having some troubles with the Universal Results right now. It shouldn't be too much longer and we'll have those included with your rankings as normal.

I'm sorry for any inconvenience that causes.
Please let me know right away if you have any other questions.

Cheers,
Joel.

Hey there,

Sorry for the trouble getting this set up.  It's possible that you could click Continue, and setup would continue just fine.

I am happy to look into this more for you, but will need more specific information from you to do that.  If you can email that information to help[at]seomoz.org with Attn: Joel in the subject, I can get back to you with more specific help.  Please include screenshots if possible.

Thanks.  Look forward to hearing from you.

Joel

Hey all,

It looks like there may be a bit of an issue causing it to randomly send through the wrong information on the Link Analysis.

Can you do me a favor and send your Campaign information into the help team at help[at]seomoz.org so we can track this? That will help us hunt down the issue and get it resolved as quickly as possible.

Thanks!
Joel.

Hey Kevin,

Thanks for reaching out. I just checked all your campaigns against OSE and they lined up just fine. I didn't see a single discrepancy.

You have to remember that while the campaign will show you Root Domain and Subdomain, OSE will also display page specific metrics.

That different metric may account for any confusion between the two.

If you aren't seeing the same thing as I, can you take a few screenshots of the discrepancy and send it in to help[at]seomoz.org?

Cheers,
Joel.

Hi Sasha,

Thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately the campaign rankings are running a little behind on a small percentage of campaigns. You should see those update successfully before too long.

As for your Competitive Domain Analysis section. The date that shows on there is 11/28/2012. If you're seeing a different date when you look at it, can you take a screenshot and send it to help[at]seomoz.org?

I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Joel.

Hey Paul,

Thanks for reaching out.
One quick thing to remember when you're looking at the social metrics on OSE, those are for the URL specifically.

They have no correlation to your actual facebook page.

For example: www.seomoz.org had 156 Facebook Likes on OSE, where as our actual facebook page has 79,222. Significant difference there.

I hope that makes sense. It can definitely be confusing if you aren't expecting it.

Cheers,
Joel.

edit: fix a word.

Hi Anthony,

Thanks for the question. I took a look at your campaign and those errors specifically and they are indeed duplicates of each other. I won't go into more details as this is a public question. If you want a few examples I'd be happy to start a support ticket for you.

Essentially it appears you have a lot of pages that all have the same title and are all canonicalized to themselves so as far as our bot is concerned they are all independent pages.

Why GWT would report differently than your sites actual information, I could not tell you. This issue is easily verifiable by visiting the pages reported as having the duplicates.

If you'd like to discuss this in greater detail feel free to shoot us an email. help[at]seomoz.org

Cheers,
Joel.

Hi Timothy - the rank tracker tool has been working the past few months, but is, sadly, once again down for maintenance (as per http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rank-tracker-update).

That said, the PRO web app - http://pro.seomoz.org - is still working and can show keyword rankings history. If you're looking for a purely free, on-demand rank tracking tool, we recommend SEOBook's: http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rank-tracker-update

Cheers!

Hi Andrew,

I just wanted to jump in with some info for you!

The On-Page reports are automatically generated for any urls you have that are ranking. If that URL changes or gets deprecated at some point, you will need to manually stop the report from running by clicking the button that says "Stop Running Weekly."

As for new ones. They will be generated if you're ranking. If you want to track something that's not ranking, you can run that on the On-Page Report Card and then click "Run This Report Weekly"

I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Joel.

Hey there,

Thanks for the question. If you have some old deprecated URLs that On-Page is still trying to check, you can get rid of them by click the Stop Running Weekly button as seen here: http://www.screencast.com/t/r7HO1zkuS

You can then either wait for them to automatically be generated for ranking keywords or manually enter them into your On-Page Report Card.

I hope that helps.

Cheers,
Joel.

Hey James,

Sorry for the confusion with Open Site Explorer. I'm afraid that Klarke is correct that our MozScape index does not crawl https sites. Unfortunately if your entire site is under the https protocol then it won't get crawled for the index.

As for the backlinks to www.studiowestgym.com it seems that we just did not find very many links. I checked a 3rd party index that is slightly larger and more frequent (majestic) and it looks like they were only able to find 8 backlinks for that site.

Your best bet is to continue your link building/earning and you should see those numbers increase.

Cheers,
Joel.

Hi Ture,

That's why I was asking what your actual problem was. You've got multiple Twitter handles being tracked and are having difficulties adding additional ones to track. It looks like you didn't send a ticket to help@seomoz.org but sent it directly do one my help team by mistake.

I'll ping him and make sure someone tackles your issue as soon as they can. It is a holiday weekend here in the states and many of us are spending time with our families.

Thanks,
Joel.

Hey Ture,

Right. Are you having trouble adding more than that?

Thanks,
Joel.

Hey there,

Sorry for any confusion.
It looks like both your campaigns do currently have multiple twitter accounts being tracked. Are you having trouble adding more than that?

Thanks,
Joel.

Hi everyone,

I just wanted to chime in and let you know we are hard at work trying to get this going.

The change in Google's processes took us as much by surprise as it did everyone else. I really appreciate your understand and patience while we get this fixed.

Cheers,
Joel.

Hi Darroch,

Thanks for reaching out.  The Keyword Difficulty score is actually put together using a proprietary algorithm from many different metrics, not just the PA & DA. However, I'm glad you're finding a benefit from your formula as well. I definitely encourage folks to develop their own techniques and formulas like that.

As for the reliability, the short answer is: Yes. We are confident that our difficulty scores are a decently accurate representation of the competitiveness of the keyword.

The question about how the KWD score is affected by unindexed pages, I unfortunately don't have that information for you. They are going to be factored in, as they should be, but the weight will obviously be less. It's unlikely that we are not going to index a high authority page so the actual effect is likely little to none.

I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Joel.