Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Lev,
You need to be counting whatever text is present in the actual title tag () on your page. Your CMS may be adding the branded mention.
<title>Example Title</title>
Check out Moz's title tag resource for more information: https://moz.com/learn/seo/title-tag
Hey Alex,
That is tough - after reading the title of your post I assumed this would be a quick "add hreflang tags and set international targeting in Google Search Console." How long have the hreflang tags and international targeting been set up? The answer may be just to 'wait'.
Do you have offices/locations in both the US and UK? If so, you could set up Google Business pages for each and link to the appropriate site given the region. This would also allow you to build local citations and/or business listings using country specific directories/websites and make sure those go to the appropriate site. Example:
Submit UK Site to Yell.com ("The UK's leading online business directory")
Submit US Site to YellowPages.com ("YP is a leading local marketing solutions provider in the US")
Hi Ruchy,
Honestly, it shouldn't make a difference, Google looks at homepage URLs with and without the trailing slash as equivalent. For my clients, I typically include the slash (" / ") at the end of the homepage canonical tag, but again, this shouldn't matter.
I actually commented on a similar post that discusses how search engines view these two different variations of the homepage, you can see that here.
Google looks at root domain URLs with and without trailing slashes as equivalent, see the resources below.
"Should we always add the final / or avoid it? Does it make a difference?" Answer: "There's no difference between them. (As opposed to not putting a slash on links into a directory, for example.)" (source)
"Rest assured that for your root URL specifically, http://example.com is equivalent to http://example.com/ and can’t be redirected even if you’re Chuck Norris." (Source - Google Webmasters Blog)
You are welcome.
Are you sure you are looking in the correct Google Search Console property? (http:// vs https:// vs http://www. vs https://www) - If you are looking in the https://www. property but these links point to the http://www. version of a URL, they will not register in this report.
I assume your links is one of these on the left-hand sidebar? (screenshot). If so, Google should be hitting your links whether they display in Search Console or not. I can see them in the cached version of a page and I can see parisnews.ir show up in an Open Site Explorer backlink report for tizland.ir.
That being said, I would caution you on these types of back links. Sitewide, anchor text heavy back links that appear to have been paid for such as these can trigger unwanted attention from Google and can lead to a penalized website. I'd recommend a more white hat approach to your link acquisition, see this Whiteboard Friday for more on this subject.
Just to clarify, this is showing up as the page with the most internal links pointing to it? Or this is showing up in the 'Links to Your Site' report?
The answer is the same though. This report just shows where most of your links are pointing to, it does not claim which are the most authoritative or those that carry the most weight. Nofollow links (links that are stripped of SEO value) will also show up in these same reports. It is simply looking at link quantity, nothing else.
Hi there,
I think you may find the answer in this Moz thread: - 804 HTTPS (SSL) error. Are you using SNI for your security certificate? That seems to be a common issues.
Other resources to help you with this issue:
How Do I Troubleshoot 804 HTTPS Crawl Error?
Moz Pro, our web crawler, and sites that use SNI (804 HTTPS SSL) error
Hope this helps!
Hello,
There are several reasons this could be happening:
The page(s) containing your links may not have been discovered/indexed. It is possible Google is not able to access the pages containing your links.
The links could be using some form of redirect that is not search engine friendly (crawlers are unable to follow it).
The pages containing your links could be using a 'nofollow' directive that is preventing bots from accessing your links/outbound links.
They have been crawled and Google is simply not listing them in Google Search Console as they have acknowledged is normal in this Google Search Console help article ("Not all links to your site may be listed. This is normal.").
Hard to say without being able to see the links firsthand. If you would like to message me with the pages containing your links, I would be happy to take a quick look.
Nah, I wouldn't worry about it. These sitewide footer links are not given much weight so I doubt it is taking much equity from the other links on the page. It is a pretty standard practice for reputable websites, I would leave it as is. Check out the link below for a Search Engine Round Table article that discusses the 'weight' of this type of link.
Google: Links In Footers Or Sitewides Are Not Given That Much Weight
Hi Bill,
I think this will help answer your question. The short answer is no, you cannot get a dofollow backlink from YouTube. I believe the Moz bar failing to properly register these 'comment' links as nofollow because they are javascript based and the Moz bar is not compatible with Javascript.
The links that I see in the video descriptions are registering as 'nofollow' with the toolbar. Even the links on individual channel homepages are being stripped of SEO value due this 'rel= me nofollow' tag which acts the same as a standard nofollow tag [see screenshot].
I will note that all internal links (links to other youtube.com pages) will register as dofollow. But outbound links will be nofollowed.
Hope this helps!
MozBar tool doesn't highlight follow/no follow, what does that mean?
I do not think this is a ranking anomaly, I just think the results are being personalized despite the common belief associated with Incognito mode. Check out the link below which will take you to the Google Chrome Forum post 'Does Incognito Mode Remove Personalized Search Results'. The top answer provides a great explanation as to why these results are not always as unpersonalized as one might think.
https://support.google.com/chrome/forum/AAAAP1KN0B0Zaq9rFwdLWg/?hl=en
"When using Incognito Mode, you’re most definitely not anonymous; you are exactly as identifiable, trackable, followable, and recordable as a Normal Chrome window. All browser info, system, plugins, IP connection, location details, etc. are provided exactly the same in Incognito, and the websites and webservices you go to are provided all the same info as a Normal window. Incognito effectively provides a very quick way to start an empty session; but if you keep using Incognito without ever closing the last Incognito window, you are just as identifiable and trackable as using a Normal window, and you gain nothing by using Incognito. (If you want true web anonymity, you need to use proxy servers or proxy services.)"
Cesare has provided an excellent answer here IMO, I like the suggestions for other markups to target. I also strongly agree with finding a plugin to implement this markup, it will save you a lot of time.
In addition to his answer, here are a few other resources that I feel will help:
BreadcrumbList Schema Page: Find information on the different properties that you can include with this particular markup as well as an example that you can model your breadcrumb schema off of.
Structured Data Testing Tool: Use this tool to validate that your schema markup is free of errors.
Hope these help!
Hi Krzysztof,
Not too much information out there regarding how much link equity is passed through a javascript link, however, this study published by Branded3.com shows their evidence that 'pagerank' is passed through JavaScript redirects. Again, I don't know how much equity is being lost due to the JavaScript redirect (if any) but I imagine links would be treated in a similar manner.
https://www.branded3.com/blog/seo-javascript-redirects-evidence-pass-pagerank/
HI there,
Feel free to private message me as I feel more information may be needed here, but yes, Google should be able to follow that link ASSUMING the page with the button does not have a 'meta robots nofollow' tag. Also, be sure the page being linked to is not blocked in the robots.txt.
Hope this helps!
Hi there,
While I do encourage adding internal links where it makes sense, you will also want to amplify, promote and share this content in social media, with relevant industry sites and with industry influencers. The more sites that pick up/share your resource and the more back links it acquires, the better off it is going to perform in organic search. Here are a few resources for amplifying your content:
How to Get Content into the Hands of Influencers Who Can Help Amplify It - Whiteboard Friday
Hi Community!
We have been having an ongoing internal discussion on user behavior data as a ranking signal. We found this Moz article discussing the topic and it leaves us asking questions such as:
The article discusses Google patents for collecting this information (The Monitoring Engine), Chrome's MetricsService which is "a system in charge of the acquisition and transmission of user log data", as well as the Reasonable Surfer model. Some highlights from the article include:
"Google has designed and patented a system in charge of collecting and processing of user behaviour data. They call it "the monitoring engine"
"Google's client behavior data processor can retrieve client-side behavior data associated with a web page. This client-side behavior data can then be used to help formulate a ranking score for the article."
The monitoring engine can:
Distinguish whether the user is actually viewing an article, such as a web page, or whether the web page has merely been left active on the client device while the user is away from the client.
Monitor a plurality of articles associated with one or more applications and create client-side behavior data associated with each article individually.
Determine client-side behavior data for multiple user articles and ensure that the client-side behavior data associated with an article can be identified with that particular article.
Transmit the client-side behavior data, together with identifying information that associates the data with a particular article to which it relates, to the data store for storage in a manner that preserves associations between the article and the client behaviors.
I do not expect a concrete answer here, I know there is a lot of uncertainty on the topic but I am very interested to hear your thoughts. Thank you!
Yep! Here is an article that can help you out with this: http://www.wpbeginner.com/wp-tutorials/display-the-last-updated-date-of-your-posts-in-wordpress/
Hi there,
You should include both the original publish date and the last modified/last updated date. Be sure the <lastmod< span="">> dates are updated in the XML sitemap as well.</lastmod<>
Hope that helps!
Hi Steven,
I assume many of these backlinks will be broken because pages were removed from your site without being properly redirected. If that is the case, Open Site Explorer's Link Opportunities (Link Reclamation) tool should be a big help. This will show all 404 URLs with inbound links that you can recapture be 301 redirecting. Additionally, you can look up the backlinks to each of these 404 pages and reach out to each webmaster requesting they update the URL of their link.
I've also had success exporting Top Pages reports (Moz or Majestic are my preferred tools for this), running any URL with a backlink to it through Screaming Frog and pulling 404 pages/broken links (or even 302 redirects) that way. I usually find additional opportunities that do not show up in the Link Reclamation report.
Hope this helps!