Welcome to the Q&A Forum

You are likely seeking SH404SEF: http://anything-digital.com/sh404sef/seo-analytics-and-security-for-joomla.html

We use Yoast's SEO plugin on all our WP sites, and the SH404SEF plugin on all our Joomla sites. Like Yoast, the SH404SEF extension uses best SEO practices and the author reads SEOmoz. If I had to compare the two extension, Yoast's would be considered better if for no other reason then it's more user friendly. Nevertheless the SH404SEF extension is awesome.

What I mean is lets assume you were to get a link from BBC or CNN how long does it take for that link to have a positive impact on your rankings?

The question is a bit vague so I need to make some assumptions. Feel free to correct me if I make any errors.

First, I am presuming you are referring to Google. Each search engine handles links differently. Next, I presume by "take effect" you mean the link will offer a positive benefit to the site's rankings. You could be referring to PR or even SEOmoz PA.

When Google discovers a link the target page will immediately benefit from the link. If you receive a link from the home page of CNN you will likely notice the benefits within minutes of the link being published. If your link is deeper in the site it may take longer to be discovered but most likely within a couple hours. If you receive a link from other sites the link may never be discovered or it may be deemed spammy and offered no value.

** if you do get a link is it normal that google would crawl your site and if so do you see this reflected in googles cache immediately?**

Once again, there are numerous factors involved. If you receive a link from a web page with 1000 other links, then Google may not follow the link at all. If you receive a link from the home page of CNN it is highly likely Google will follow it, but they may not do so on the initial visit. Whenever the link is followed, you can expect for Google to update their data.

Your site is very poorly optimized. You would benefit a lot by implementing basic SEO best practices. A good place to start is here: http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo

Regarding Bing/Yahoo, Bing has a 10 year agreement to control Yahoo's search results so they are basically the same company from a search result perspective. They have different ownership then Google and operate differently. If you have an outstanding site, then your results may be aligned but otherwise there is often differences.

What keyword are you trying to rank for? A best practice is to focus a single keyword per page. Your home page title is: Roof Installation, Roofing Contractor, Siding Contractor Chicago, IL. Apparently you are trying to rank for multiple words which will not yield the best results.

Another sign of your keyword focus is your H1 tag which is missing on your home page.

When I search Google for "All American Exterior Solutions" you rank #1. If you want to rank for "roof installation" there is a lot of SEO work to perform. Your home page only uses the term a single time in content and it is not in the first sentence so it does not appear to be the focus of the page. You also have another page of your site which is better optimized for the term: http://www.aaexs.com/residential/roofing

Also, your footer is incredibly spammy.

Google desires to return relevant, quality pages in their search results. You may be a great company but your web pages need to improve in order to rank in Google for the terms related to your business.

Would I be ruining my SEO work if I begin to publish blog posts for the same keywords that my content pages target? Am I basically forced to find alternative keywords and only target one page per keyword?

In short, yes.

When Google provides search results they need to search trillions of pages to determine which result is most likely to satisfy a user's query. One of the key components of their algorithm is relevancy. If you have a page titled "chocolate ice cream" and then a blog article with the same title, which result should be returned to a user who searches in Google for "chocolate ice cream"?

If you offer multiple pages with the same keyword focus you run into an issue called cannibalization. You can solve that issue by narrowing the focus of one of the pages. For example, the main page on your site is what I would refer to as "evergreen" content. 10 years from now someone can read that page and the information is likely still valid. Your blog often offers fresh content which is more time sensitive. Some possible topics for an article:

Top 10 Chocolate Ice Creams in the world

Lowest Calorie Chocolate Ice Cream

Chocolate Ice Cream Recipes

I would also recommend being very careful when providing content on two similar keywords. It takes a level of expertise to do it in such a way that it adds value to your site. One helpful step is to use anchor text. If you write an article on "Chocolate Ice Cream Recipes" then one time in the article when you refer to "Chocolate Ice Cream" present it as an anchor link to your main page.

Roughly once per month. There are several factors which affect the schedule so it seems to vary. Here is a link to the schedule: https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/345964-linkscape-update-schedule

It just updated on May 31st and the next update in scheduled for June 27th.

** How do I tell Roger no to crawl these blank pages?**

Any easy solution is to block roger in robots.txt

User-agent: rogerbot

Disallow: [enter pages you do not wish to be crawled]

But a better solution would be to fix the root problem. If your only goal is to provide clean reporting to your client the above will work. If your goal is to ensure your site is crawled correctly by Google/Bing, then Jake's suggestion will work. You can help Google and Bing understand your site by telling them how to handle parameters.

I would prefer to fix the root issue though. Do the pages which are being reported as duplicate content have the "noindex" tag on them? If so, you can report the issue to the moz help desk (help@seomoz.org) so they can investigate the problem.

Jarin,

I cannot specifically answer why your site's PR is not available. There are numerous possibilities including a glitch in the latest data feed which offers PR. I was able to verify using a couple tools the PR for your website is not available.

I understand your concern. Penalized websites will show the same results you are seeing, a PR of n/a or a grey bar. Since you are ranking #1 for numerous keywords it seems clear you are not penalized.

I do not look at the PR for any of my sites. It has no tangible value. You can choose to agree or disagree, but I have worked with many sites and helped them earn top rankings without looking at PR at all. If you don't wish to take my advice, perhaps you will accept the same advice directly from Google.

In 2009, Google discontinued the practice of updated PR and now they only offer the information about 3-4 times per year. Susan Moskwa from Google wrote:

"the PR you see publicly is different from the number our algorithm actually uses for ranking. Why bother with a number that’s at best three steps removed from your actual goal, when you could instead directly measure what you want to achieve? "

For further details read the full article: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/beyond-pagerank-graduating-to.html

A great tool I use is SEMrush: http://www.semrush.com

You enter a website and it will provide you a thorough list of keywords the site ranks for along with their position in SERPs along with other details.

Here is a screenshot of the SEMrush results for SEOmoz. I was surprised to see SEOmoz rank for "slickdeals" but it seems in 2005 Rand wrote a few words on that topic so it is a legitimate result.

http://www.vitopian.com/shared/semrush-competitive-research.png

If I want to target a keyword phrase to a particular phrase, but do not want to change the URL of that page, will that negatively impact my rankings?

A better way to say it is you are missing an opportunity to make a change which can positively impact your rankings.

A page's URL has a very minor effect on rankings. There are two larger secondary effects. First, if you offer a clear, relevant URL your click-through-rate may increase. Additionally, when others link to your page by copying and pasting the URL, you will naturally have good anchor text which is very helpful, especially in our post-penguin world.

Stefan correct shared there is not a reason to create a new short URL.

Can you share what changes have been made to the site? A few ways this can happen are:

• a change to the robots.txt file

• a change to your site's template either removing a canonical tag, a noindex tag, or altering your pagination in any way such as modifying paginated titles

• resolving an onsite issue which prevented crawling of these pages

You should absolutely be able to exercise complete control over what URLs are contained in your site map. It is dependent upon your sitemap software. There are hundreds of software solutions available.

Regardless of the site map, you should definitely no index the pages you do not wish to appear in search results. A robots.txt entry is definitely not the best solution.

Do you think the english homepage will have more seo power if it goes directly tohttp://www.website.com/

In short, yes. When you redirect any URL you will lose between 1-10% of the link juice from your backlinks. That does not sound like much but since it does affect every link it's something to consider.

Are the overwhelming majority of your visitors English readers? If so, having the site default to the English version makes sense.

Depending on the nature of your site, you may wish to offer pages for the various types of English such as EN-UK, EN-US, etc.

One idea would be to create a company page for your site. You can then upload a company logo or other image to represent your company, and use that page to represent the author of your content. Then, any results would show your company image.

For example, look at the SEOmoz Google+ page. It shows Roger bot as their face photo. I don't believe SEOmoz uses their company page as the author for any material, but it seems they could.

To clarify, the above is just an idea and my best guess. I have not implemented this practice.

There are numerous theories about the "Google dance" which occurs when a site first gets indexed. It is very common for new sites to see their results wildly bounce for the first month. The prevailing theory, which makes a lot of sense, is a significant portion of Google's ranking algorithm is dependent upon Google's own data. When you click on a search result, Google obtains a lot of data. Some examples: how long you spend on the result page, do you bounce back to Google and search for the same query again, etc.

In an effort to gain more data from new sites, Google artificially boosts the ranking of new sites. The result is their results appear higher then they would otherwise be found. More users click on those results giving Google the data they require to properly rank your website.

April 24th was when the Penguin update rolled out. An experienced SEO would need to evaluate your site to offer a solid diagnosis but most likely you have been hit by Penguin.

A look at your backlink profile strongly suggests you have been hit by Penguin as well: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links.html?no_redirect=1&page=1&site=www.emergencyglassrepair.com%2F

"Windshield Replacement" is used in 8 of your top 10 links. Your link profile is extremely unnatural which has led to the penalty. This penalty will require a huge amount of time and effort to have removed. Your site shows over 2200 linking root domains. The cost of fixing this penalty is so high you may choose to switch to a new domain. In short, you need to contact every site which provided an unnatural link (likely 2k+ domains) and ask them to remove them. If the site owners actually remove the links, the penalty will be lifted. If many do not remove the link, you will have to submit a very detailed record of every link to your site and all the efforts to remove the links. The IRS requires less documentation then Google does for this issue. Even if you win, they will "partially" remove the penalty.

Best Wishes.

Hi Vince.

What exactly do you mean by "PR"? Google internally uses PageRank as one of over 200 metrics when evaluating a page's placement in results. Google does not make that information available except for 3-4 times per year. PR has almost no value in daily SEO, even Google clearly and repeatedly has stated such. You may wish to read Susan Moskwa's discussion of this topic along with her advice to not use PR as a metric for evaluating websites: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/beyond-pagerank-graduating-to.html

One possible scenario where a website could have an internal page rank higher then the home page would be if the site performed an important interview. For example if a local website conducted an interview with the Vice-President, then the internal page which offered that article could receive coverage and links from hundreds of important sources around the country. The PR value of that page can then exceed the home page.

For an actual example, the best I can offer is using SEOmoz Page Authority (PA). A company called Screaming Frog offers SEO services but they are most famous for creating a web crawler. Their home page (http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/) has a PA of 57. The screaming frog crawler page (http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/) has a PA of 62.

I hope this helps.

** Edited reply based on feedback from Keri

Hello,

Are there any plans to expand Moz Local to Canada?

In the mean time, does anyone have a suggestion for a similar tool for Canadians?

For your ranking concern, there could be many factors involved and without a lot more details we cannot be sure the issue is related to the brand name at all.

About the brand name, the first recommendation would be to dedicate your home page to the brand. Your current title is "Trophies | Plaques |Trophies and Awards | Medals | TrophyCentral". You are targeting 5 keywords which is a very bad move from a SEO point of view. If that was my site the home page title might be "TrophyCentral".

Not only are you targeting too many keywords with your page title, you are also cannibalizing your own site as you have other pages focused on trophies and other keywords.

Raymond shared some good advice. You can further establish your brand on your home page by focusing on it.

There are a few steps you can take:

• you can ping Google with an updated sitemap after you add new content

• you can earn links to the new pages. If you earn any links from high authority sites, Google will find the new content much faster.

• you can increase the authority of your website by earning links. For example, Google usually indexes new Q&A questions within a couple hours. This fast indexing is due to the perceived importance of this site and these pages.

• you can provide better internal linking to the new content. A great technique is to add a "New Products" block to your home page and then add these products to that block. Google indexes content directly linked to your home page faster then if you have it buried in your site.

All redirects experience some decay of link authority. The amount of link juice loss with a 301 redirect is between 1 and 10%. You will retain 90-99% of the link juice.

Another note, I would strongly recommend removing the technology extensions altogether. Showing pages as .htm and .html offer no benefits to users. Also, next year your developer may want to change to .php or another technology whereby you will need to go through this process all over again.

Ask your developer to simply leave off the tech extension. Use www.mysite.com/example rather then www.mysite.com/example.html