Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Your developer is correct (partially) :). You see, that DOES affects SEO but in a good way. Over time, Google has learned to recognize what's best for the user, and from my personal point of view, having a "lightbox" (that's how that "window" is called) is far better than opening a new page if you can present the property details better. Whatever looks better for the user, then it will also look better for Google. Google is also capable of running and understanding Javascript, therefore you shouldn't have any problem, even less, when the link actually points to the page, so search engines unable to run Javascript can still scrape the site perfectly. Hope that helps!

I see there seems to be quite a large discrepancy in the number of links / linking domains between the two. Are you sure both are getting the same amount of links built? Have you manually checked?

Insite- Sucks but that is the limitation. You can post your request to increase this to more words at this link.... https://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums/293194-seomoz-pro-feature-requests Not sure if you knwo this, but seomoz just raised some vc money. Now that rand raised some big dough I have to believe that they are working on a bunch of revisions to the tools.  SEOMOZ is already worth every penny, so anything they add will be gravy.....good luck.... Mark

jejejeje... it sounds like seomoz tools... have you ever take a look to them?

I'm not quite sure I understand what you're getting at. Could you give a little more of a use scenario please?

You mean monitoring as in you just want to see what's going on? Social Mention, Ice Rocket, Board Reader, Search.Twitter, Google Blogsearch, etc, etc, etc. If you just want to see what's going on now and then, I'd set up what some people call a social media listening station. It's pretty straightforward, is very flexible, and runs through whatever your favorite RSS reader is. If you need more, take a look at the answers here: http://www.quora.com/What-social-media-tools-like-Radian6-SM2-etc-cost-less-than-500-month