Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
I have a client that has over 90,000 incoming links from a single IP address. I can't figure out who's linking to them.
I've used several different reverse IP lookup tools and can tell that the server is in Europe and ISP is AT&T Global Network Services Nederland B.V.. (http://www.ip-adress.com/reverse_ip/194.196.0.36) Says there's 0 hosts on that IP.
Any suggestions?
Hi Bob,
Buzzsumo is a great (and free!) tool for finding popular content. You can enter a topic or domain and it will provide you with a list of the most popular content over the past 6 months, month, week or 24 hours.
As Keri points out, it makes sense to profile your intended audience first so you know who's most likely to convert and appeal to their information wants and needs. But if you're looking for link and social bait as a way to increase your perceived popularity in Google's eyes, I've found Buzzsumo to be helpful. It also helps you see where your audience likes to hang out online. For example, when I plugged "NLP" into Buzzsumo, I could see that the preponderance of sharing was of CDs on Facebook and Twitter.
I'm also going to check out the article Ruben pointed out. Hadn't seen that yet.
It can be a bit tricky.
This short and simple how to might help.
http://kb.mediatemple.net/questions/242/How+do+I+redirect+my+site+using+a+.htaccess+file%3F
Just look at Google webmaster tools to be sure there are no external incoming links. Then go ahead and move it.
Thank you so much for responding to this still-kicking thread! And on a holiday!
My expectations were low given the age of the last post, but didn't want to start a new one and fragment the conversation. Glad to hear there's still hope.
Hi Cyrus,
It's been a couple of years since this was last discussed. Have badges moved up the priority queue for new development? Can we get an update, even if the update is "no progress".
Donna
Or just noindex it for now? Seems worth a try unless someone more technical has a better suggestion.
Are you seeing the error only when Moz crawls the site? Google Webmaster Tools isn't signaling any problems?
D
Hi.
https://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/discover/v8r4/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.discovery.es.ad.doc/monitoring/iiysawhttp.htm says it's an error that occurred when the crawler attempted to connect to your Web server. It says a slow site or network might be the cause of the problem.
Your robots.txt is set correctly and your site is accessible (I just tried), perhaps your best bet is to wait and see if the problem recurs.
I also ran a scan of your site using screaming frog and got close to 2,000 internal server errors (response code 500) primarily from pages in this directory - http://mississaugakids.com/mississauga-events-calendar/. The pages are loading very slowly. That might be contributing to your problem.
Maybe start there and then circle back to see if the 612 error is recurring? I'm not very technical, but perhaps they're somehow related?
Buzzsumo might be able to help with that too. How helpful it turns out to be will depend on how specific your search topic is.
Buzzsumo will allow you to enter in a search topic or domain, filter by publication type (article, infographic, guest post and so on), and then sort by the number of twitter shares. Because you're looking to identify top brand/athlete/celebrity shares, and because they tend to have a boat-load of followers, they're likely going to rise to the top after your sort. Eyeball the results and and see if any pop out.
Yes agree, 301 redirects are the way to go. I'd want to take a look at incoming links to individual subdomain blog pages before deciding whether to do a single subdomain to subdirectory redirect, or use a page to page mapping and redirect strategy.
I concur wholeheartedly with every point Robert has made.
Bottom line, and you know this - you said you did - Moz is only one piece of the puzzle. As Robert said, it's in its early days, but I like it. For $49 it doesn't promise the world. It says it'll update 10 of the most important recipients and aggregators of local data with our your most important local data. It does that. And it provides a wealth of educational material to accompany it.
I recommend you take Robert up on his offer or continue down the path of self-optimization making sure you fill in remaining blanks. I have a post on how to do local SEO if you want to start there. It won't answer all your questions, nor will it result in as good an outcome as you'll get from hiring a pro like Robert, but it might help.
Donna
Sorry. It's a best practice and has been for a while. Extra work, but adds clarity for visitors and search engines alike.
I agree with Robert, you're mixing apples and oranges - trying to rank in Trinity and Tampa at the same time. You're also correct in noting that listings are only part of the equation.
Search Engine Journal published a post back in April that succinctly summarizes what you need to do to rank well in multiple locations. It also points you to the Google's Places Quality Guidelines if you're not already familiar with them.
Bottom line though, you need a dedicated page per location on your website. Each location page has to be clearly differentiated with a unique (and local !) phone number and content. This is the page you should be submitting to Google Places via Moz Local.
Make sense? Or am I telling you something you already know?
Did you see the post authored by Cyrus Shepard earlier this week (http://moz.com/blog/bye-bye-author-pics)? He concludes there are still plenty of good reasons to use Google Authorship.
Assess the quality of the publication you're considering writing for, and decide based on that. If it's a reputable site, I would set yourself up as an author. Look at the recent posts on Moz and other leading SEO blogs. They're still using authorship and follow links. Let that be your guide.
Hi BBuck.
Join the crowd! Matt spurred a lot of confusion and conversation with his "stick a fork in it" comment back in January. It's taken a while for a broad consensus to gel around what that really means. Search Engine Journal has a lot of solid observations and commentary on the topic. John Rampton at SEJ perhaps said it best "SEO isn’t dead. Guest posting isn’t dead."
Here's what I've been able to gleen. It really boils down to intent.
Guest blogging purely for the sake of trying to acquire inbound links is not advised. If, as in your case, you're soliciting guest posts with the intent of helping educate and assist your audience, that's perfectly acceptable so long as you set and follow strict guidelines to ensure quality. Examples of "quality guidelines" can be found on sites like Moz and SEJ and include, in addition to those you have outlined above:
I think even follow links are fine, so long as they are relevant, on-topic references.
James,
I did a scan of your site. Your problem appears to have several sources. Do you know how to use the screamingfrog scan utility? It's free for sites with less than 500 pages. When I ran a scan on your site, looking only at the html pages, i came up with 283.
I suggest you run and scan and inventory to get a good idea of where your problems are.
I'm not seeing your http://www.cryopak.com/en/?DepartmentId=xx (where xx represents 67, 25, 4 and 66) in the scan results. They're not redirecting and I don't see a canonical tag in the source code so I don't know what to tell you about those.
If it helps, I can direct message you a CSV file with the results of my scan.
Hi James,
I suggest you canonical the duplicate pages rather than 301 redirect them. Using canonical tags instead of 301 redirects will allow you to preserve any incoming link equity from external links to those pages. With a 301 redirect, you'll lose that equity.
David may have run your site through Open Site Explorer (OSE) and seen that there's very few incoming links to the duplicate pages and therefore felt it unnecessary to canonicalize them. I see only 8 from the example you gave us above, but don’t want to assume that’s all there is, especially when you're saying you see duplicates on the site, If you have webmaster tools set up, you can get a more exhaustive list of incoming links there.
The other thing I noticed is that the incoming links to the sample pages are coming from a cryopak subdomain on another site. Here are the ones I can see using OSE.
|
http://cryopak.spydertrapdev.com/product_line/default.aspx?DepartmentId=25
http://cryopak.spydertrapdev.com/product_line/default.aspx?DepartmentId=4
http://cryopak.spydertrapdev.com/product_line/default.aspx?DepartmentId=66
http://cryopak.spydertrapdev.com/product_line/default.aspx?DepartmentId=67
|
I get an error when I try to look at spydertrapdev.com so can't tell if that's a development environment that's been set up for your site or what. These may not be links you want to maintain. You’ll have to decide.
Good luck.
Donna
Here's another excellent source of link building ideas Ivan - http://pointblankseo.com/.