Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
How long you have set this? I think it may take up some time before you can see some changes in Google Webmaster Tools. But again I personally do not like Google Parameter handling tools because it is meant only for Google and therefore, your website will appear duplicate to other search engines. So, I would rather use robots.txt file to fix this. A simple tag like – Disallow: /?sort=*
_Ideal solutions would be using Meta refresh tag but the problem is search engines are against this practice. So, as things stand, you have to use 301 redirect to fix this issue. I know there is a possibility that ranking may suffer a bit. So, here is the suggestion -
What about making a bit changes in the body content to use this page as a landing page for a new product. I hope you just have to make some changes in the specification or the title will have a slight modification. If you can manage to do this, you will be in a win-win situation. Let us know what you think about this. _
_Hold the fort for a while. I am not concerned about the menu or the way you are going to feature the links. What concerns me is that you are going to make your website very much vulnerable to Panda updates. By creating pages that are solely built for ranking high in some Location specific pages, you can make your website very much susceptible to algo updates. Build a website for users and not for search engines. This is what I would like to suggest you. However, if you still want to create location specific pages to rank high in location specific keywords, you need to make sure that you are not adding run of the mill content. Focus on what kind of exciting things you are going to offer to people of that location. _
_There is no hard and fast rule. You just have to think like a user and if you feel that footer links are necessary, you need to get rid of them. However, if you feel that the footer links are fine and they are adding to the usability factor, keep them intact no need to remove them. But again, let me clarify my stance here. When I say footer links, I mean they should be nature and that being said, you should not make them keywords centric. Like for the “About Us” page, ideal footer link should look like – “About US” and not “About SEO Company London”. Keep them, short and natural and you will not have to fear anything. _
_Rather than copy and pasting the same thing over and over again, you can create a FAQ section in your website and each answer should have a dedicated landing page. Once done, whenever you see someone has posted a question that matches with FAQ section, you can place the URL and ask the asker to gather more information from there. _
Of course, Google will be adding more weight on Google Plus because it is their products and they have got all the data. Tweets and Facebook likes also help gaining more online exposure but what I believe is that social signal is important but it is not as powerful as links. Google, just like any other search engines depends heavily on links. Social signals are important but they cannot override the importance of links.
Moreover, the sample size of the test is small and therefore, a definite conclusion is hard to draw from this.
Try this tag instead since you are going to use exactly the same content on your website –
_However, you are free to set Google Cross domain canonical. For more information - _
_http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html_
_I think if the article is not excessively long for say 10000 words long and available in a single page, both the links will share same value. Of course the number of out bound links matter here. If you have included 50 or 60 out bound links in the domains, definitely the link juice will get divided. But as we cannot tell how search engine algo works, we can only assume here. _
What I feel is that when you are adding authorship markup against the website, there is a possibility that the ranking of your website is going to get reevaluated based on the Author Rank of the profile. So, if you have set up authorship mark-up against the website, you need to make the author profile look active. Promote it with Guest posting, keep it fresh with regular updates and all. Hopefully the ranking will recover, unless the website has been affected by any other algo change otherwise.
_Unless the blog is a news site and unless you would not wish to make the most of Google Freshness update, I would rather suggest you go for only post name as URL. _
_After the penguin update you have to be careful while linking with anchor text. It is now like following a middle path and this is the kind of anchor text policy I would like you to implement -
Natural Anchor Text: 25%
Click Here
More Info
Click to Know More
Branded Keyword and Long tail keyword 30**%**
Example.com web design company in Birmingham
Example.com – best web design company in Birmingham_
Example.com Birmingham
Related keyword 30% One of the best web design companies in Birmingham
Award winning Birmingham based web design company
Creative web Design Company in
Targeted keyword 15% web design Birmingham
_From pure link building perspective, commenting on the same IP blogs may not be adding that much value to the link profile of your website. But do not take it this way. Blog commenting is more than just link building, it is about engagement and believe me when you are commenting on reputed sites that match the theme of your website, it can really drive real traffic to your website. So, please do not post thinks like this – “Great Post”, “Awesome mate, keep posting like” etc. You need to do post comment that adds value to the conversation. _
_Ok if he/she was an SEO expert, he/she would not have suggested you do this. This will kill your website, rip it apart and make it vulnerable to search engine algo shuffle. Ok thing may not be that severe as I have said, but it will make your website’s link profile dirty and of course a colossal waste of time and money. _
Seems like some of the pages of your website are now returning 404 server side response code-
http://selfdirectedira.org/blog/search/pensco+trust
http://selfdirectedira.org/blog/about/
Suggest fixing them.
Suggest blocking the test pages like this - http://selfdirectedira.org/shortcodes/tabs-accordion/
Your Google Plus Profile lack image - https://plus.google.com/118416969633262389449 .
Though I am fully aware of the fact that the design of a website has got little to do with the ranking, I believe that you need to change the look and feel of your website. Probably, the interface is causing people bouncing back. So, please let us know the bounce rate of your website.
It seems like the latest Robots.txt file has not been cached by Google so far .. this is what it has –
So, you need to use Fetch As Google Bot and Submit this Robots.txt file to index to fix this issue at the earliest.
What concerns me that defunct URLs like this - http://www.kozelben.hu/login?r=%2Fceg%2Fdrink-island-bufe-whisky-bar-alkotas-utca-17-1123-budapest-126126%23addComment or http://www.kozelben.hu/supplier/nearby/supplierid/127493/type/geo are returning 200 Ok server side response code whereas they should be returning 404 server side response. The problem would have stopped here for once and all.
However assuming the fact that the CMS of your website does not offer you any such option [in that case, this is a bad CMS], you need to apply Meta noindex tag against them and wait patiently for search engine to catch them.
_Can’t you fix the 404 thing? Let us know. _
Can you show us examples of URLs that are causing you trouble? That would be easier for us to provide a solution.
Ok if the previous job posts are causing your concern, you can easily fix this by setting up meta data expiry:
_It will automatically remove the content of the page from search engines index as soon as the job becomes unavailable. _
Content of your website still bears some similarities with some external websites - http://digitalcatwalk.co.uk/store/product/lady-loose-coat/ - content of this page bears some similarities with the following URL - http://goarticles.com/article/Fashion-Advice-You-Shouldn-t-Pass-Up-On/6997768/
H 1 tag is wrongly implemented –
_All the internal pagination series have duplicate content:
http://digitalcatwalk.co.uk/category/968016/sandals-flat/2
http://digitalcatwalk.co.uk/category/968016/sandals-flat/148
http://digitalcatwalk.co.uk/category/968016/sandals-flat/147 `_
_Suggest removing the content from all pagination series. _
_You are offering - “Custom Made Fake Diplomas, Fake College Degrees and Transcripts”? In that case, I fear most of the SEO professionals would not help you in one way or the other. This is what I believe is not a legit business model. _