Welcome to the Q&A Forum

If you use plural versions too but in a sentence that makes sense are they considered keyword repeats (in title tag) ?

Hi

Google friendly fonts - are these in wide use now, do they work ? If you have image heavy site do they work just as well as using what we used to call 'seo text'.

I have heard that 'seo text' not really used anymore or at least rebranded to 'helpful, informative paragraph or two of body copy about the page with a couple of the pages target keywords in it'.

I take it if fonts in image not google friendly then should still ask dev for some space to fit in a para or two of some proper body copy, with couple of pages target kw in it ? Also looking like if i succeed in this request will be below the fold, how hard should i fight for it to be above the fold ?

cheers

dan

Thanks Schwaab !

H

If kw research shows that singular version of a keyword has higher search volume than plural version should you still use plural version in main on-page areas to try and catch both instances or focus on the singular ?

cheers

dan

As far as im aware only Exact match now available

Cheers Chaps !

absolutely agreed still better to have a link than not

doesnt matter which one you go for so long as you stick with it to be consistent

most people these days seem to be going for non www option

Thanks Oleg

But the co-citation/occurance will occur anyway wont they (if brand is mentioned on page) ?

But then i suppose the link just helps elminate any doubt in G mind as to the location of co-citated/occured brand, so better to have link if possible

I see that Wikipedia outbound links are all no-followed, is there any benefit (aside from the traffic) for having links here now ?

For example is their co-citation and co-occurance benefits.  I know there is without the links since from seeing previous Moz content about this saying Google getting good at connecting brand/s and topic mentions on a page (without any links) so appreciate Wikipedia is still good for that sort of thing. And a no-followed link is obviously good for the potential traffic.  But is there any additional SEO benefit to having a no followed link on a wikipedia entry/stub too ? (aside from its contribution to your no-followed links which in turn contribute to a natural looking link profile)

Cheers

Dan

Many Thanks Chiaryn

Yes i can see i can do that moving forward but i was here looking into finding a way to view the reports detail retrospectively

Thanks Anyway

All Best
Dan

Hi

First - is it possible for internal anchor text to be considered 'over optimised' in terms of diversity or does that just apply to external backlinks ?

For example If you have a main site section/page thats about a service you offer and you call the page this service and the URL this service and then link to it from many internal locations (but in a logical useful manner not just for the sake of it) using this service/keyword as the link anchor text i take it this WONT ever be considered over optimised anchor text since is completely in context, makes sense, is useful and after all is what the page/section is called (so would be strange to call it and link to it via any other term) ?

Second - I have a project who's backlink profile is nice and diverse and could by no means be considered over optimised on a domain level.  However looking at page level a main site section/page (as above) has only one back link with exact match anchor text from the BOTW directory, so in regard to that page keyword rich anchor text from this one backlink is at 100%.  However the anchor text is what the page/section is called (title and url).  I presume that this is also unlikely to be considered over optimised (since makes sense, is logical helpful and would be strange to name it anything else) or could it be considered over optimised ?

Thanks

Dan

Hi

Whilst i've set up reporting for on-page grader when it comes through on report it just shows any changes in grade and rank, what i also want to look at is changes in the detail/components of current report compared to previous reports, is this possible historically (over the previous reporting periods) ?

There doesn't seem to be any kind of archive that i can find to previously carried out on-page grade report ?

Cheers

Dan

Ok thanks Joel i will do

I am surprised this isnt already a feature though since you must have many UK (and other country) customers requiring country specific date formats ?

Cheers

Dan

Great many thanks for the update Keri

Actually im still getting display probs in some campaign pages ???

ignore!! - all seems sorted now

Hi

As of today my overview pages are devoid of formatting and just text and basic display, anyone else getting this ?

Cheers

Dan

Hi Abe

So we cant currently set as default until we await an update ?

Yes pls submit as feature request if not already

many thanks

dan

Thanks Thomas