Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Byron

At a first glance at least, I would not agree with your new SEO. I definitely prefer your actual flat pyramid url scheme than this new high piramid url proposed.

Google will never read those deep new urls!

Maybe I would try to change your actual ones, but never hiding them three leves deep beneath earth...After undergoing such penalties I personally would not be so much afraid on making huge changes, and I would take the "risk" of changing them but do not hiding them!

Hope it helps to build a panorama.

Good luck

Cheers from a sunny winter in Spain

Claudio

Cuterank Great free version for single site!

I love the unlimited time historic graphs for ... good to show clients the "hard work done"!

I wouldnt pack it up with a huge list of keywords and serps cause as it runs in your computer and it may turn a little bit unstable and block serps.

Cheers!

attached a long time historic graph

3oOiI0h.png?1

Hi there Auke Jongbloed

Looks like you are a little bit disappointed, it would be a pity not to make use and take real advantage of this tool... I´ll do my best to guide you, as far as I can, on this extremely powerful tool you have started to learn to use.

1) Reports, I would advise you to use the new dashboard http://analytics.moz.com/dashboard/overview it’s awesome and depending on the settings (http://analytics.moz.com/settings/campaign) you make, you will be mailed weekly to your email. Anyway, you can view the reports for the accounts you created once moz has collected all the necessary info, here: http://analytics.moz.com/search/on-page-grade-report they are really quick, but we must have some patience (i know its a seldom rare characteristic for us humans but, let’s try our best)  as they need some time, you know google, and all those search engines folks are not so keen to give us precious info...

i) Here, you will be able to manage initial settings of your campaigns, will take approx. one week to collect all the    info and generate report http://analytics.moz.com/manage-campaigns

ii)and here you have help resources and documentation for reports: http://moz.com/help/pro/on-page-reports

2. Probably didn´t collect the necessary info, but wouldn´t guess, sorry if I’m wrong...:(

3. Pls have a look at the message attached about this issue, actually its not an issue but a notice. If you correctly used canonicals on a single page it would be advised here: http://analytics.moz.com/search/on-page-grade and here http://analytics.moz.com/search/analyze-page on this last one you will find a list of issues and notices, if you did correctly your homework for canonicals, then you will find a notice about having it done.

Hope giving you some help on this great tool for improving your skills and knowledge for SEO!

Cheers from this sunny southern Spain

 

vp9vWZ6.png?1

Iris if you do not want your web be found, delete it from your previous post!

As we told you, after examining home of your web we can observe that it has used canonicals adequately.

I wouldn´t get annoyed about misunderstandings and would keep up research about this powerful tool, read, learn, ask questions as you did, you will be definitely rewarded.

Cheers

475 results for in followerwonk for  "york yorkshire"

Try this to start and look at results. Would that be a relevant and useful result for you?

For the moment I would try those sort of combinations.

"la vittoria è vicina"

Keep on trying and you will prevail!

Cheers from southern spain.

Buon giorno caro amico David

I am guessing... probably used any twitter tool (or this new and great moz.com twitter tool: https://followerwonk.com/) to follow all you lucky guys living in York...and just included in their profile "Set to open October 22nd! @Andrewpern of @thestaratharome, fantastic new restaurant situated in the historic Lendal Engine House, York Museum Gardens."

Is this what you are wondering or I am really mixed up?

By the way, good and cheap strategy...

Hanno un grande giorno!

Cheers

Hi Iris, as Martijn Scheybeler says, moz could be reporting  a NOTICE finding those canonicals.

You should see something as: "Here are some other things we found in our last crawl about this page. These notices might not be affecting your site negatively, but might be interesting for you to know."

It´s a notice not an issue to be solved.

Hope it´s useful and you can continue scaling about using moz which is a terrific tool to optimize, just need to get used to it!

Cheers

Do not become discouraged or get mad at yourself about this situation.

A new paradigm is emerging, Google will not supply info about the visits that are coming from its search engine and we are obliged to work on this completely new environment, trying to find ways out and palliatives, in the meanwhile.

All of our proposals are to "overcome" this current situation for 100% not provided. Our obligation is to move forward and find alternative ways of coping with our clients’ needs and our thirst for info.

You (actually we) should start a new approach to Bing & and other SERPS from a different perspective. As Fishkin told in his WBF (actually Tuesday) it’s a matter of Google´s monopolistic situation, they are driving us to Adwords, and the only way out is to find other means of information different from Google´s search engine.

Come on, lets give Google a "damn good battle to fight" ( actually I do not mean any  battle, nor  fight but let us move forward)

Cheers

Hi Mike, I do not use SEM Rush but I do use moz.com, we must tune up the kw ranking because it will propose you a set of keywords but maybe not all of them or not exactly the ones you are looking for.

Actually if you just want to check your own site. Try the free version for cuterank

http://cuterank.net/download/

Basic but works and it is for free. There you will have to put the keywords and the search engine you want to check and it will povide you some useful info.

Hope you profit on this

Yeap, Christopher I agree with Peter!

Not an analytics problem but Google encrypting and not sharing its info with anybody!

1. GWT will give you "some" info definitely incomplete, rough and by no means manageable as presented in analytics.

2. Unfortunately we will have to use (and pay) adwords to seek more about kw

3. Would pay much more attention to other search engines, Bing? They do share though!

Look Rand´s WBF for more precise info.

http://moz.com/blog/100-percent-keyword-not-provided-whiteboard-tuesday

Maybe Google is "Breaking Bad"

7ISiAwg.jpg