Edu links service
-
http://www.getedubacklink.com/
I found this site and was curious if anybody knew if they were legit or quality links in any way.
My site has thousands of legit backlinks (none paid or even built through a service) so I was interested in building a greater diversity from domain extensions and thought edu links would be good. However most edu pages I find that allow any links are SPAMMED hard and not worth my time.
Thoughts
-
I used a very similar service that promised 25 edu backlinks for 25 dollars. It was a huge mistake, as all they did was place spam comments on dofollow edu blogs. We actually saw our ranking drop a couple of spaces because of this. I learned my lesson and will never do anything like this again. Hence, I do not recommend this. Any company that charges to get you links usually only acquires poor quality links.
-
You get what you pay for
If they only charge 25 bucks it cant be worth much -
What's worse is paying a lot and getting nothing.
-
What's even worse than that is paying a lot and getting something that will actually hurt you, which is what usually happens with those kinds of services.
-
I agree - what i was trying to say is if they are charging so little your for sure getting nothing worth anything.
-
I agree with Marisa, I had similar experience... In the end my domain was blacklisted and I had to move my site.
-
This post is deleted! -
$25 package is our smallest one and it's kind of "test" package. 40 backlinks package receives 90% of sales. We still don't charge high amount of money because we aren't a large company. Some huge SEO companies use our service to outsource their projects. Additionally, we don't place links on comment pages.
-
Can you provide us with a sample page you have gotten a link on?
-
Sure, check your PM!
-
can you post it publicly so we all can see what type of work you do?
-
Sure. Here's the example page -Â http://bit.ly/xEQjsR
-
The page looks OK to me, the category looks like may others have done the same thing. I'm seeing hundreds of pages with thousands of articles similar to http://zoomation.asu.edu/gallery/zoomation_text.
-
Well, sure there will be other people who post their own articles on the site. We aren't affiliated with those educational sites, if that would be the case, prices would be a lot higher. Sites we post links to are open for registration and anyone can create their own pages there. But that doesn't mean backlink from that site will hurt your rankings, because that's not blog comments or something like that. Nobody can post their link on the page where your link is. Additionally, you can check sample rankings of our clients' sites and you can see SERP improvements.
-
I see that as well. With that in mind would links like this be worth my time? The domain authority is obviously really high but the page authority isnt. Could of course build links into the .edu page and help some but even then is it worth the effort here?
-
I have seen thousands of sites like this that have been created with the sole purpose of placing links and articles on to help ranking. I predict that one day Google will catch on and these sites will face a similar fate as did the Panda affected sites of last year.
-
Im trying to figure out the difference in this and guest blogging. If legit effort is put into the articles and pages when they are posted how is it any different than guest blogging?
-
webfeatseo
As I posted above, our clients' sites had good SERP improvements. I'm not going to tell you that our links only will move your site to #1, because no, they won't, you need a lot more than just 40 edu backlinks to rank on #1, but surely our links won't hurt your rankings, they will move your site to higher place and give authority to your domain.
We are tracking SERP movements of our clients and we always saw only positive results. However, you can always try, price isn't too high, we have small prices so that everyone could afford it. What else can I say.
Also, I want to make a note that not all links come from blog posts, some of them are from profile pages. But more than half of profile pages still have content.
About guest blogging - such links are pretty much the same as other links. But they come from .edu domains and you can post about anything you want.
Marisa
That's not the reason to stop link building. Google can do anything they want, anytime they want. They can remove your site from it's index without any reason and nobody will have right to complain, because they own their site and have full rights to their data, plus it's free and you don't pay for being in the index.
Saying that Google can catch you and remove from index for building edu links isn't reason to not build them. You can say that about almost anything. For example: "Google may not like the blue color in your menu bar and remove you from index", "Google may not like one word in your article and remove your from index". So I think you got the point.
Google says don't build or buy links or you will be removed from index since the launch, but if people stop link building, they will loose huge traffic and opportunity to make good amount of money. If you always do what others want and tell you to do, you'll never succeed.
-
Rand has a great post on link valuation:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links
There's no magic to .edu links, frankly - the data over the past couple of years doesn't really support that they're inherently better than .com's, etc. It's true that many .edu sites are high-authority sites, of course, but that's just a correlation (it's not that Google prefers .edu or .gov inherently).
Within any site, though, you have to look at the Page Authority, the number of links on that page, the placement of the links, the anchor text, the relevance (to some degree), and a lot of other factors. Let's take a non-edu example - DMOZ. People kill themselves for DMOZ links, but lately I'm seeing DMOZ listings where the entire page isn't indexed because it's so deep. No indexation means ZERO link juice. So, even though it's DMOZ, the link is worthless.