Feedback on linking strategy

[CraigAddyman]

If someone wanted a link from my site and wasn't willing to provide content they wouldn't be getting a link.

If it's something that I might actually like to link to then I'd expect the relationship to have started a different was rather than a direct request without content.

You have to remember it is a trade they are getting a link and you are getting added value to your site also.

[GardenBeet]

what i am trying to do is 'make the trade happen' - if they wont write it - well my counter offer is 'you pay me and I'll write it'

[CraigAddyman]

Maybe upping your admin fee will help encourage them to write the content but really they are just paying for a link

[PeterAlexLeigh]

I'm surprised that people ask you for a link and then can't be bothered to write the content. That's like catching a fish, but then throwing it back in because you couldn't be bothered to pull it all the way up.

I like your logic on setting this up, but I would definitely be a little wary. You don't want your links being devalued.

Aside from that, do you fancy an article on how a loan can help with garden improvements or is that too far off niche for you?

[GardenBeet]

ok - so you also reakon its black hat  -

[CraigAddyman]

There is a fine line.

All I'm saying is any time wasters not wanting to contribute to your site doesn't deserve a link unless of course you want to link out to someone who will benefit your readers.

[PeterAlexLeigh]

Felicity, I wouldn't necessarily bunk it in the black-hat category, but it's certainly grey.

Clearly you're not just offering a paid link, you're also creating some content, which is good.. But your site is making it clear that the user is paying for a link within a blog article.

Your site clearly isn't spammy and it's got a good general feel to it. As to whether google would penalise your outbound links (if they happened to come across your site), not sure. It's not like your putting links up for who-ever wants them, as you're also seeking a degree of relevancy. Tough one to call

[CraigAddyman]

Hahahaha never miss an opportunity!!

Thumb up for that lol

[PeterAlexLeigh]

haha, always worth a go!

[GardenBeet]

ha Shelly love your segue - now this is an interesting issue indeed - a garden as an investment - yes - all for it - a garden can be an extension to the living areas of a house....there has been a transition in people's approach to outdoor space and the spend - totally in my niche - would love it -

felicity@gardenbeet.com

[GardenBeet]

ahh ..people who ask for links are probably not the people reading my blog...which is where I ask for the blog submsisions ...but having said that I have had a blog submission heading on the top menu since february - the text only changed today - it use to make a strong plea for articles...

..all my submissions come through networks i have established ..usually tweeter ...so perhaps i am not on the radar...........

[PeterAlexLeigh]

I'll write something up and get it over to you

[PeterAlexLeigh]

That's probably a good thing, making a strong plea for articles can give off the wrong impression and potentially put people off making them. People may question why you are so keen for articles.

[GardenBeet]

ha ...maybe but guess what ??? I have had 5 requests for articles in the last 4 hours ........maybe people are just lazy !!!

[PeterAlexLeigh]

I think you've tapped into a nice new form of business there

[qlkasdjfw]

Felicia, tell them to get fu#*$@ if they don't want to write content.

Charging is a great idea too.