Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

Category: On-Page / Site Optimization

Explore on-page optimization and its role in a larger SEO strategy.


  • Personally I prefer the websites with many pages, I seem easier to rank, besides your site looks very much like an affiliate site which tend to have trouble ranking, why you do not do a single blog, put static the page of discounts and write articles  there.?

    | Valarlf
    0

  • Glad you agree, thanks for your answers guys.

    | mtgconsulting
    0

  • Here's the link to the Google guide for Ajax URL indexing. Hope this helps.

    | SEO5Team
    0

  • Hmm. Yeah, I was planning on diversifying the keywords on each of the pages, using phrases that are getting traffic for a particular area. There seems to be a lack of well-established "best practices" for local SEO title tags, and this is something I've been trying to nail down for a couple of months. I hear that geo modifiers should go before any keywords, are you suggesting maybe this isn't the best approach? Contact Us - Springfield IN Dentistry | Springfield Dental Care Experts Dental Surgery - Springfield IN Dental Surgery | Springfield Dental Care Experts Thanks!

    | kbaltzell
    0

  • The two most important points expressed in this thread of comments are: There is a reason for 404s, don't 301 everything There is no reason to lose the value of someone linking to your page. If those 2 statements are true then you should create an individual error page, and then everytime you serve a 404 you should include canonical to that error page. That page should have useful content (explanation of page missing and where you could go), probably a search box, and links to the most valuable content on your site. This satisfies both points.

    | ajmihalic4
    0

  • Worse than using a keyword 30 times in a very long article would be using it twice redundantly in the title of the article. "Growing garlic: a guide on how to grow garlic" Your garlic article does contain 1250+ words, including garlic 30 times.  Your title includes it redundantly.  The question you really need to know the answer to is: "how do the top sites rank well for this without putting it in the article 30 times?" http://www.greenharvest.com .au/Plants/Information/GarlicGrowing.html This is one of the top results here in Australia.  It uses the word garlic about 25 times and ranks very well despite having garlic on page very frequently. <title></span><span>Garlic growing information</span><span></title> ^ Their title also contains the word, but just once. So, I would focus more on the structure of each page and less on the keyword density.  I don't think you're overdoing the density, although the repeated title may hurt you.

    | MattAntonino
    0

  • Problem solve thank you very much! Stupid I didn't realized this simple solution before! Was thinking too far.

    | OceanDrivers
    0

  • Xml Sitemaps is a very good tool. If you want to have a collaborative process discussing the sitemap with the rest of the team i also recommend http://writemaps.com/tour/

    | SEO5Team
    0

  • They said b/c wordpress is open source if there is an issue also with any plugins that site could be hacked.

    | TP_Marketing
    0

  • This post by Peep Laja might be helpful for you: http://conversionxl.com/dont-use-automatic-image-sliders-or-carousels-ignore-the-fad/

    | WilliamCarr
    0

  • Hi Is there any way that we can avoid rewriting content for  whole site? Do you mean that all websites that have 1000+ pages writes content again if they have sites in .com.au and .co.uk? Isnt it a big big work? AMit

    | expertvillagemedia
    0

  • Do you have Google Webmaster Tools set up? That's the easiest way to confirm that Google is, in fact, indexing all or at least most of your URLs. Who set up your canonicals? Can they look into it for you and make sure everything is okay?

    | CMC-SD
    0
  • This topic is deleted!

    0

  • Yes, I have read that it is good about 50% from the backlinks to be with different anchor text. (A good reminder.) But is this good only for the external links? I was thinking also  is it ok to point my internal backlinks to one page for one keyword?

    | vladokan
    0
  • This topic is deleted!

    0

  • If Google did consider the class or id names as part of the text then people would be making sure they were full of keywords for their sites and it would be listed on SEOMoz as a spammy tactic. As that's not the case I would say that Google doesn't include it. Also you shouldn't be worrying too much about Keyword density - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-myths-that-scare-seos-but-shouldnt-whiteboard-friday

    | CPU
    0

  • Yes, search engines wont crawl a page indefinitely without finding content http://thatsit.com.au/seo/reports/violation/the-page-contains-a-large-amount-of-script-code

    | AlanMosley
    0
  • This topic is deleted!

    | usef4u
    0