Welcome to the Q&A Forum

They aren't guaranteed to appear, from http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=47334: We only show sitelinks for results when we think they'll be useful to the user. If the structure of your site doesn't allow our algorithms to find good sitelinks, or we don't think that the sitelinks for your site are relevant for the user's query, we won't show them. At the moment, sitelinks are automated. We're always working to improve our sitelinks algorithms, and we may incorporate webmaster input in the future. There are best practices you can follow, however, to improve the quality of your sitelinks. For example, for your site's internal links, make sure you use anchor text and alt text that's informative, compact, and avoids repetition. I realise that doesn't tell you why you previously had sitelinks and no longer do, but hopefully there's some info there that helps.

Ouch, sorry about that, attached the image . what do you recommend i shoudl do now ? going to check the links you mentioned above.

_I have checked some of the posts of the Home page and I see certain patterns and this is quite predictable: 1. Most of the posts are basically complication of images already available in other sites. Though the content is unique, the images are nothing new. 2. I have found two content heavy posts in the home page and what I believe that they are guest posts. Now, guest blogging is great but what I mean to say is that you should not be too dependent on guest blogging here. You need to come up with two or three posts [I prefer content heavy posts] before_ _3. Seems like you are publishing reviews. Make sure if these reviews are paid, you should be adding no follow tag against them. Though it is the linked sites that should be penalized for this, I prefer to be safe than sorry. I know this may sound a bit harsh. I hope you would not mind. _

If your site is ranking "well", well enough for you I mean don't change anything if users are finding there way to what they want. Now for the noindex-follow tag that will not rank the certain pages in the serps but the links on the page will pass pagerank . For the nofollow-noindex or nofollow-index will just hurt the site rankings as they are average pagerank 4 cutting of the power of the posts in the certain category-tag pages not passing any link juice. The best thing to do is leave the pages as is. If the category-tag pages rank better than the posts then i would just noindex them leaving follow on the pages to pass juice towards the posts.

All right, thanks Keri :}

Thank you so much, ofcourse i will do keep you updated :} cheers

Hi, I see but it can be a reason, they are identical. Try to change twitter and property and check. It is possible that SEO MOZ crawler/scaner looks only for "description" ?

Hello Zora, yes i have around 11k pages. About search, wow how did i missed it. on other thought that page consists of google search. i am gona change that and see how it will turn out. thanks alot :}

"a friend of mine suggest me to nofollow all out going links in such postings. he added that it will help increase posts PRs and better search rankings." this is not true, nofollowing the link is simply throwing away that bit of PR and not passing it to the other site. Removing it as a hyperlink and simply showing the url as text or obfuscating the link are two ways of retaining your PR.

Thanks alot :} thats what i needed to confirm!