Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Thanks Martin, not 301'd the pages before so it's still a mystery why this has happened! They're not new pages, been around for years without this problem!
We're aware of the underscore issue, this is how we found the URL's when we took over SEO, as the pages are ranking well I feel it best to leave as is.
Thanks again, Lee
Many thanks Martin, appreciate the feedback!
We've 301'd the following trailing slash pages to the non-slash pages so hopefully this should resolve the problem.
http://www.kingstoncabinets.co.uk/wooden_white_oak_radiator_covers.php/
http://www.kingstoncabinets.co.uk/designer_radiator_covers_designs.php/
In answer to your questions;
1. No cononicals on the issue pages
2. No problems with the .htaccess file.
Am just confused why this has happened!
Thanks again, Lee
Hi, have never seen this before so am hoping soemone can shed some light!
Google seems to be forcing a trailing slash at the end of our php pages within the search results.
For example, Google is indexing http://www.kingstoncabinets.co.uk/heat-convection.php/ (trailing slash) rather than http://www.kingstoncabinets.co.uk/heat-convection.php (without slash).
The trailing slash page doesn't display properly and has no page authority.
I've ran the site through Screaming Frog and there are no internal links the the trailing slash URL's, nor does there seem to be any external links to these pages.
Why is Google forcing the slash?
Am confused 
Hi Mark, although I don't have any conclusive evidence I would say that Google does index hashtag URLS.
Think of it this way; when you link within a page using an anchor (#), Google see's the '#' and 'non-# URLS' as unique URLS so logically this does suggest that they do index the full URL.
Hooe that's helped, Lee.
Many thanks Thomas, interesting to hear that it may mean that the penalty has been lifted!
No 301's were done, am not sure if any third party site cleaned up their act and by the looks of it no backlinks have been removed, unless of course they simply weren't picked up by Majestic and OSE and we weren't aware of them.
Am still swaying towards the idea of the message simply expiring, but your theory has a lot of legs.. still confused!!! 
Lee
Webresence.
Hi, just a quick one.
We had an unnatural link warning for one of our test sites, the message appeared on the WMT's dashboard.
The message is no longer there, has it simply expired or could this mean that Google no longer sees an unatural backlink profile? Hoping it's the latter but doubtful as we haven't tried to remove any links.. as I say it's just a test site.
Thanks in advance!
Many thanks Pete, will see what we can do and take action. Appreciate the advice
A thumbs up for Martin! I'd do what he suggests Christian and get rid of the footer links and replace them with a link from a relevant page, preferably within the body content. There may already be a relevant page on the site that can pass a little authority, but if not follows Martin's advice again and get writing!
Enjoy the weekend guys! Lee.
Appreciate that Alsvik, thought as much.
Still not sure whether I should be worrying about it too much though! Anyone else got any input?
I'll buy you a beer when you do Alsvik! How are you fixing the problem if you don't mind me asking?
Hi Scott, you should ask yourself why you want to use the services? Is it to publicise a newsworthy story and increase brand awareness or to simply build backlinks to your site for SEO gain? If it's the latter I wouldn't recommend them!
It is fine using these services, and in my opinion, worth the cost but PR marketing should be done with PR in mind, not SEO. Only submit a release when you truly have something interesting to report, it's about encouraging coverage of your news/brand, and that goal wouldn't be achieved with cr@p content!
Hope that's helped!
Lee
Roger (the SEOMoz robot) is reporting 1000’s of duplicate pages, duplicate titles and overly dynamic URL’s. These are being caused by our dynamic forum/shopping/testimonial pages.
I appreciate Roger’s efforts and for making me aware of the situation, but should I be worrying about this too much? I believe that this shouldn’t affect rankings or SEO performance.. but then again I want to make Roger happy and see ‘0’ next to all errors and warnings! J
Many thanks in advance!
Lee
Yes Christian, I would definitely request removal of the links.
The Google Penguin update on April 24th targeted sites that were using spammy backlink tactics, and site wide footer links came under that bracket, particularly those that didn't seem natural (i.e. non-relevant). Other backlinks that came under attack were site-wide blog roll links, and links from spammy networks.
No one knows for sure if the backlinks you mention will harm your site, but my guess is that they will.
Would love to hear other people’s opinions!
Lee
Having just done a search on Google.co.uk for 'payday loans' I am baffled as to why the top two organic results (image attached) are even associated to the keyword.
The KW isn't present in the title, metas, or content. Nor do any backlinks use relevant anchor text.
I'm guessing this is an algorithmic 'f*ck up', do you agree?
Many thanks for the response, I was however referring to a 301 redirect on the same domain (just a new page on this domain). Would it still work?
A quick question, born out of frustration!
If a webpage has been penalised for unnatural links, what would be the effects of moving that page to a new URL and setting up a 301 redirect from the old penalised page to the new page? Will Google treat the new page as ‘non-penalised’ and restore your rankings?
It really shouldn’t work, but I’m convinced (although not certain) that our clients competitor has done this, with great effect!
I suppose you could also achieve this using canonicalisation too!
Many thanks in advance, Lee.
Wow Rand, thanks for such a detailed and frank answer, I now have a better understanding of the issues you face.. it's much more complex than I imagined. Great to see that you''re doing all you can, look forward to the improvements.
Have a great week! Lee