Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Bottom line, should the opportunity for conversion be readily available at all times? Absolutely! Should you ever flood links across your websites pages for the purpose of increasing the likeliness they will click the link most likely as a result of human error?

Absolutely not, don't do that. I'm probably misinterpreting the question my bad if I am, but just on the off chance I'm clarifying of coarse! I find that you will get tremendously more value than rushing the monetization. Any sales technique that is initially viewed and interpreted to be a sales gimmick, will most likely fail out the gate..

What my sales training taught me when working for a multi million dollar bank that invested thousands into my education of moving their products and services is that selling complete garbage that offers literally nothing can easily be done! (Nothing horrible just credit card insurance haha.)

About 5% of my sales with that bank came from drive by pitches. So incentive wise, I didn't do so hot in the first 3 months. However, Once I learned the true powerhouse/weaponry, the one two punch of sales  was RAPPORT/Rebuttal. Once you refine those 2 skills, It was game on!

On the internet if you master this craft, which most certainly I have not, it is a process that can be entirely automated after much trial and tribulation. MY boy is a Ecig Vape juice vendor, he tells me he actually gets 25% of his sales by literally hitting people up in the chat box when they land on his site. And he gets another 25% from hitting them up AFTER they've made a purchase, which causes many to buy tons more stuff!

In conclusion, gain their trust, get them to humanize you and your products first, sell second. Spam always fail!

I did a bit of Affiliate marketing for Crakrevenue a few months back White, and one thing I advise that affiliates aren't going to tell you proactively is to add rel="nofollow" on your affiliate link.

My adult affiliate site was very easy to drive substantial traffic hitting the right hot spots, and I ranked it pretty quick. In short order, many of the affiliates I was advertising for had less authority than me.  So to avoid passing all that hard work to get authority to someone who was merely paying me for traffic, adding the nofollow tag was a quick fix.

You definitely WILL NOT get a benefit in SEO from an affiliate, that would just be to easy!

Just to clarify, are you adding them just in posts or specifically using Facebook Business and adding them to your profile photos like in the image shown?

If not give that a try, otherwise, I'd say just move on to optimizing something else and assume your good, it doesn't always read dead accurate.

i4xsk2G.png

On the business side of things @Kingalan1, I can totally understand looking at SEO from a consumer perspective it should be only reasonable that if you're paying a doctors wage that you could get at least a time estimate. The problem we face is that there are so many factors beyond not only the consumer, but the SEO strategists control.

I think what Chris Menke said, "you should be very, very well educated on the topic of link building before investing your company's money in it." is very crucial in the fact that the more research you put into SEO the better results plus the more money you'll save. In your position what I would probably do if you want VERY HIGH authority links is actually research into each one you want individually.

News Websites seem to be rather heavy hitters for example. So every News website has journalists that write articles which have email addresses to contact them. With some time and money invested you can very much expedite the link building process. I wouldn't go into setting goals of link quantity, but rather target quality. Because as I'm sure you know sometimes 1 link could be worth what 1000 others would provide you.

So if you hire a professional SEO strategist to do these things for you, I would research into the quality of their work, and their results. But I wouldn't go into it with a certain expectation or time frame for any particular result.

On-site is priority number 1. Before you can conduct any off-site, you need to have a solidly built website to direct them to, or they'll simply bounce.

There are niche affiliate marketers such as Income School that rely solely upon on-site SEO for the success of their businesses. While I disagree with their theory of not conducting off-site strategies as a part of my link building efforts, I like the fact they solidify the necessity to focus on your website.

I'm not sure what you mean as far as Technical SEO, I think there are quite a few advanced aspects to both on-site, and off-site SEO, but I haven't seen it categorized separately from the two by itself quite yet, not saying some experts don't, just new outlook to it as of this moment.

I think updating the content is always the best option, especially if any backlinks are pointed at it as Joseph stated. Keywords may be a non important outdated function, but their presence certainly doesn't hurt a pages ranking any, so if you update the pages meta description and page content that would probably be your best bet.

I just read an article that had a good strategy for deciding whether or not to disavow by Amanda DiSilvestro. I thought it was pretty on point:

https://www.seoblog.com/2017/07/signs-disavow-link-site/

Btw very beautiful site! I'm impressed!

Wow, I didn't realize how cut throat of a competition a keyword that I've never heard of until just right now potentially can be hehe. Your site is solid , it's ranked I noticed a couple improvements that could starting with the title:

Vastu for House - Gruha Vastu - SubhaVaastu.com

Your h1 is this:

Vastu for House | Gruha Vastu | SubhaVaastu.com

The first sentence in the article:

Vastu for House | Gruha Vastu | SubhaVaastu.com

That becomes a 3 fold repetition, plus it isn't grammatically to form sentences and utilize those line separators like that with content visitors are going to read hehe. So with your title, possibly try "Vastu" isolate in one of those 3 keywords your separating just entirely by itself to declare it as a keyword.

Then use like:

"Modern Homes with Vastu and Gruha Vastu." for an h1.

Just as long as you're mixing it up.

The first sentence just include the target keyword and bust out with a transition word off the rip as well.

Also your entire 7000 somethings word article has no headers aside the first h1  (I didn't scroll to the very bottom). You need headers every 300 words max or that can impact in some way.

Hope that helps!

I had to make several hundred pages for a video tube at one point. And what I did to expedite the process is use the clone post/page plugin. Then I created a clone with 3 things.

The first thing was the templating for the meta description and title for each video**(naturally I did that with Yoast)**. The second thing I did was create a short code with php to place the page title in several areas using simply [template]. Then for the final automation aspect, I appeased the alt tag necessity with a js script to dynamically add alt tags with the page title on all images.

I don't know what the outcome of the said feature your describing is, however the way you would accomplish your desired end result is by adding a bunch of generic meta title/descriptions with the bulk editor feature of yoast. Naturally skup over the 30 pages, you'll simply need to make a template one time then copy it to clipboard and paste paste paste like a madman! Wont even 5 minutes with 200 pages.

**They absolutely should notify Google! ** you should file a DMCA complaint with Google:

https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/legal-removal-request?hl=en&pid=0&complaint_type=1

Google is very reluctant to do anything resembling work typically but if you file the complaint accurately and all your ducks are in a row, they'll de-index the copyrighted content.

I just got done reading the discussion between Brian Dean and Gianluca Fiorelli in reference to the "200 Google Ranking Factors" slightly throwing me for a loop on my thoughts for this. If we went by Brian, AKA Backlinko's methodology of site level factors theres kind of a mechanism behind the URL Extensions usage, and the actual domain name/subdomain.

Assuming that Brian's factors are close to Googles actual algorithm and we take it to be accurate, the trump card is an exact match domain.

second to that is when the site contains keywords in the beginning of name but not the entire phrase and then next is keywords anywhere in domain. Then Sub Domains, and lastly url extensions.

for your 2nd url, I wouldn't use the url extension you selected because it's in the domain name.

I kind of had a similar link structure on my first drop shipping store and I kept using "Burlesque" for every single thing, and I don't think it gave me an edge.

One of my best structured sites was an adult affiliate domain and I basically took 1 thing that was pretty much just 1 single genre and just completely dissected it into hair color, eye color, nationality, wardrobe, celebrities on and on and on.

Basically what I'm eluding to is that im not knowledgable in this particular vastu buildings, but you certainly are.  Perhaps the way to structure it would be based upon different sub types, maybe even the historians that developed and found their variances, like.. Silpa Prakasa? Because then you'd have more keywords and an exansion of relevance in your content increasing the odds of longtails.

---

As far as clarity and simplifying the obstacle at hand which is to get in the top ranks of the key term I think perhaps something innovative and unique implemented into your content would add some new flavor and obtain the audiences reactions necessary to boost you back into the game.

1. Videos
2. Infographs
3. Images with superiorly optimized dimensions and metrics that include captions

I think those would be game breaking! Where it stands your domain's DA matches the difficulty of the key term. So I theorize adding some amazing to the content would be the game changer needed! You see "Stealing Backlinks my little baby blog couldn't possibly make board against neil patel and brian dean in the race. But image number 4 was number 1 for like a month. Google has some amazing dynamic to it's algorithm and if you produce high grade stuff, it knows!

dDuM7jJ.png

To get the full benefit of changing the link structure it's probably a good idea to structure the whole thing correctly as opposed to just throwing it on top of the links you have now. As long as you do the redirects right, it should be a smooth process.

You can make the whole page nofollow by dropping this in your header:

<code><metaname="robots"content="nofollow"></metaname="robots"content="nofollow"></code>

It's ridiculous, however it has been in my personal experience that an exact match domain if utilized on an optimized website, carries a tremendous advantage over it competitors. This doesn't mean I am suggesting to abandon your domain, however, DNS registrars can be purchased very inexpensively.

One of my latest projects has been dynamic web page creation with RSS aggregation. The competition when it comes to "Sword News" is quite pathetic in all honesty, primarily major news sites you'd get relevant advantage upon once established, and the runner up is some Shopify store with less than 200 pages in it's index.

However, when you search News.Google.com, there is a rather large abundance of Swords in that feed of news headlines. Google trends seem to reflect lush and consistent popularity. While "SwordNews.com" Apparently is owned by someone who left it on blocks somewhere in Amazon's cloud, "TheSwordPost.com" and "SwordTimes.com" both were open.

The way Google seems to work as far as successfully being admitted into their news feed, is you need to generate a boatload of traffic for like 1-2 months cranking 1000s of hits a day should be sufficient. Wouldn't you know it, Reddit is a endless VAST of trolls and nerds all about that sword life lol! The important factor is Google loves money, so while your juicing those numbers on your news feed site, you need to be spamming Google Adsense applications like it was a matter of life or death you get approved, then magically I bet you anything they'd be your best friend with the search results all of a sudden!

If you succeeded in being capable of outputting swords into google news and referring the traffic to your money site, you sir would be ballin hard!

According to a video I just saw of Rand's white board Friday's, It apparently doesn't have to be an h1, but whichever the first header you lead out with should have the title, yes (I use h1 so I'm not confused lol). Your doing everything right as far following the Yoast plugin and synchronizing everything on the pages, and your on the right track wanting to structure it more efficiently.

My first drop shipping store I had gotten to about 800 pairs of shoes and 20 blogs till I hit a realization I was going to have to modify each and every one of the items to structure it appropriately lol! Looking at your sitemap I don't envy the work that will be involved in categorizing everything.

I did a few searches for Architecture template/cheat sheet for cellular, came up dry. I would start with 4 main categories

• Apps/Software
• Physical Merchandise
• Information
• Blog posts/articles.

Obviously go with optimized names for those, your doing a good job with the onsite so you'll know the right names. From the main categories just slowly pick apart and split the piles into more categories and groups, use tags for your smaller quantity specifications that wouldn't sleeve out categories well. It will slowly and painfully come together! Good luck

I have been basically adding the JSON markup at the bottom of the body on my content.

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/intro-structured-data

The Helper guides you through generating it:

https://www.google.com/webmasters/markup-helper/u/0/?hl=en

And lastly make sure you run it through the tester to ensure there isn't any errors:

https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/

DKKTiYz.jpg

This White Board Friday Rand released is quite helpful:

https://moz.com/blog/seo-photos-visuals-graphics-whiteboard-friday

Careful on the social engagement thing, I was running experiments and apparently 200 retweets was a little to much in a 24 hour period from an arbitrary tweet containing an image lol! Got ghosted for like 2 weeks.

If you want a helpful infographic additionally

https://i.imgur.com/1bCoCnR.jpg

1bCoCnR.jpg

As jcnotfound2083 states the ideal is to use a 301 redirect. I am certain it very much will pass authority. Reason being I've seen many black/grey hats check for broken links on NY Times on older articles and should they see a DoFollow to a expired non owned domain, purchase the lease and 301 redirect it to a domain they want authority passed.

When it comes to the NYTimes scenario, I'd Personally make a website and put relevant content on it, giving me the most longevity as to not appear blatantly obvious that I'm manipulating the situation for ranking. In the case of this image, you don't want to just swap it with another one especially if it's annoying and had say for instance the date meshed in with the url extension, which is to much to deal with. This will redirect it to your homepage

Redirect 301 /foldersAnd/ToOldImage/image.jpg /

https://yoast.com/yoast-seo-insights/

It picks the prominent keywords based on density, the frequency the words are being used in the content.

I'm not sure what "Content Suggestions" is, I could be blind and I'm just not seeing it on the Navbar or something. To the best of my knowledge if you're referring to this "Keyword Magic Tool" thing that SEM Rush has, I don't thing MOZ has a comparable tool. Then again I've never really had difficulty identifying and selecting keywords to target on my own.