Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Yes, see what you mean.
We get the same if we view source.

Inspect element shows it correctly.

I take it you mean SEO checkers are checking the source code.. before JS modifies it?

Do you think this is hurting our SEO?

We've run a on-page grader test on our home page www.whichledlight.com with the keyword 'led bulbs'

it comes back with saying there is a H1 tag, although the content of the keyword apperently doesn't contain 'led bulbs... which seems a bit odd because the content of the tag is

'UK’s #1 Price Comparison Site for LED Bulbs`

I've used other SEO checkers and some say we don't even have a H1 tag, or H2, H3 and so on for any page.

Screaming Frog seems to think we have a H1 tag though, and can also detect the content of the tag.

Any ideas?

** Update **

The website is a single page app (EmberJS) so we use prerender to create snapshots of the pages.
We were under the impression that MOZ can crawl these prerendered pages fine, so were a bit baffled as to why it would say we have a H1 tag, but think the contents of the tag still doesn't match our keyword.

I'm wondering what's best practise for markup in the nav bar.

So if we have

<nav>

Can we have headers in there, does it help? If we do, would a H1 confuse google as to wether that is the H1 of importance of the one in thein the

</nav>

what about MOZ. Does it crawl/look at the google cached site or will it check its own version...
it's just we updated the site not long ago and I don't know wether MOZ has picked up the changes yet

Hi community!

We have just run a page grader for the keyword 'LED Bulbs' on whichledlight.com and it comes up that we are keyword stuffing!

However, a brief look at the source for the homepage and there's only 6 times that LED Bulbs pops up.

We do have the non plural version of the word 'LED Bulb' on the page 27 times.. do we think that would contribute to the keyword stuffing?

Thanks!!

We have recently updated all our product page titles on our website to something more descriptive for our Google Shopping campaign. This was what was recommended we do by the folks at Google. Doing this causes all of the URLs for the products to reflect this change. The structure is as such: https://ourwebsite.com/bulbs/product_id/title. Now when Moz provides us with our weekly crawl report we see a load of duplicate page content errors (roughly the same amount as the number of product pages). I don't quite see this as a coincidence so it must be a consequence of having updated the titles.

My question is why is Moz still crawling our older links? We no longer link to any of the pages with the older URLs so why are they conflicting?

Thanks Dirk!

Will look into it now.. I wasn't checking the source but rather looking in Chrome Dev Tools

Hi Dirk,

in regards to https://www.whichledlight.com/bulbs?page=2

the link syntax is as follows though...

Are you saying that when you're on that page that the href is missing..??

Thanks

Hi,

We are currently working on a single page ember.js website which compares LED light bulbs (seriously...)

the site is www.whichledlight.com

the problem in question is www.whichledlight.com/bulbs

we are using both rel=next/prev as well as cononical and wondering what affect this would have?

all the canonical reference themselves I think, and are also present on the product pages.

Our google impressions have dropped recently as well, so we are wondering wether or not this is having a negative affect in regards to how well google wants to play with us.

Any ideas?