Welcome to the Q&A Forum

We have a client that had an existing site with existing rankings.  We rebuilt the site using DNN 7 and created/tested 301 redirects from all the Original URLs to the new DNN URLs which are nasty and have /tabid/1234 and will not allow for dashes (-)'s

We have found a DNN module that will make the DNN 7 URLs search friendly.  However, that will cause us to 301 the current DNN urls to the new URLs so in fact the original will redirect to the DNN and the DNN will redirect to the rewritten SEO friendly URLs.

What should we know here before proceeding?

I have a Fortune 50 serving client that has for a few years been operating their site on a .net domain since the .com was not available.

They have just aquired the .com domain for their company name that was unavailable before.  However, it was not a transfer of a live domain.  In whois it is showing as brand new and "unseasoned"

For now I have recommended that they just perm forward the .com to the .net and leave the .net as the TLD

But I am sure they want to in the future make the switch.  What would my best course of action be as the SEO consultant?

I have a client www.woodard247.com that shows only a bit over 100 inbound links. using the Open Site Explorer, they are a well trafficed local site and are not doing any grey hat or black hat techniques.  However the rankings for their main keywords have suffered recently and we cannot identify any duplicate content or keyword stuffing issues.  We have never purchased links or used link building software.  Now for the main question: When we run Open Site Explorer it shows only a bit over 100 inbound links on the page and the domain, but the subdomain shows over 66,000 total links!  How can this be possible?  Could this be a problem?  How can I find out what these links are since Open Site Explorer and Seo Spyglass both show only a hundred or so?

Facebook pages are "no-follow" meaning no juice is passed directly to the site.  However, the different signals and navigation of the viewers has an indirect organic affect.  If your traffic is increased with a "no-follow" then it is affecting your "organic results" indirectly.  However, the page rank "juice" isn't transferred via page rank, but rather by sending traffic.

Facebook pages are "no-follow" meaning no juice is passed directly to the site.  However, the different signals and navigation of the viewers has an indirect organic affect.  If your traffic is increased with a "no-follow" then it is affecting your "organic results" indirectly.  However, the page rank "juice" isn't transferred via page rank, but rather by sending traffic.

If You can't address them can you create a sitemap or robot that doesn't count them?

https://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=156449

If You can't address them can you create a sitemap or robot that doesn't count them?

https://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=156449