Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Sure. Use a VPN to place your IP in the country you want to test, create a new browser instance with the language set to the target countries language (or language within that country you want to test), and then search the location specific version of Google, i.e. google.co.uk instead of google.com.
While not all inclusive of what users will be seeing from within that country, that should give you at least a more informative snapshot. Cheers!
Ah, I hadn't realized that. I can't speak to whether or not OSE is technically able to analyze tld of .website domains, but it appears they're all at DA 1 currently. We'll have to get tech support on this one.
Yeup! Indexing time varies. You'll be able to tell the time between crawl and indexation by when Google shows your page version B in it's cache after you made changes from A, so if the 'example.html' page is already in Google's index you'll see this:
You make changes on a page, example.html (version A is now version B)Google crawls example.html (version B)
You check Google to see if example.html is version A or B in the cache
no?
no?
no?
no?
yes. That's how long it takes.
OR, you make a new page. It gets crawled. Checking if it's indexed... no, no, no, no, yes?! That's how long it takes.
Again, this time period varies and having a site with excellent domain strength and trust usually makes it a shorter time period. It also tends to influence how many pages Google decides to keep in its index or show to users. Pretty much everything gets better for a site the stronger its domain authority and trust are.
If the entire page where you're writing is about content marketing, on a site that is related to content marketing, chances are the link would line up fine.
Whether or not you're allowed to copy and paste the article verbatim is something you'll have to determine from the site you copied from, but even noindex wouldn't address the problem of plagiarism if that's what you're worried about as the article would still be on your site. Basically what you're doing is the reverse of what's in the Google guide on Canonical:
_Content you provide on that blog for syndication to other sites is replicated in part or in full on those domains. _
http://news.example.com/green-dresses-for-every-day-155672.html (syndicated post)
http://blog.example.com/dresses/green-dresses-are-awesome/3245/ (original post)
So in this case the News site (The Daily Business Review) is the source of the article, and you're one of the sites syndicating what they wrote so you point back to them as canonical. Still the questions you bring up are part of the reason why several sites--HuffPo, The Verge, SlashDot, etc--write their own take on a source article instead of reprinting verbatim when linking back. It's more of the annotation model I mentioned above.
Hi Ram. If Jon's fix above doesn't work, you might want to post the link(s) you're testing with Screaming Frog so that people here can see what's going on and give you specific recommendations. It sounds like there's a 302 in place on the http version of your site, but people will need details to see where exactly. Cheers!
Hi Morgan. Your updates look good. One thing with OSE is that it doesn't update instantaneously and is actually refreshed on a monthly schedule or so which means any changes you make that work well in Google and on your site will take a while to get recorded in OSE. Did you try checking your site in the webmaster tools Google and Bing offer? Uploading the current sitemap should help clear things up further. The latest update is scheduled for March 11th at which time you might see this information updated, see: http://moz.com/products/api/updates for past information and this post discussing OSE: http://moz.com/community/q/have-questions-about-the-jan-27th-mozscape-index-update-get-answers-here in more detail.
There are also some other backlink checking tools out there such as Ahrefs and Majestic that are useful for finding even more links. Mostly OSE is suited for checking the link profile of several competitors and getting ideas one where else you can market your site. For example, if you know of some other photography sites that are ranking highly you can add them into OSE and begin to see what they've done and how you could improve. Your current work looks fine though so you should be good to go. Cheers!
That's a fairly thorough redirect and has a pretty high likelihood of not delivering as much link juice compared to a standard, dead simple link. Still, it's a nice page and those are well-known brands, so appearing there would have positive branding benefit for human eyeballs.
Or it could be the same day. In general it varies quite a bit due to both how competitive a term is and how much domain / page trust & authority you're working with in the beginning. There's no hard fast rule I know of that says a new page or site can not rank at all for X period of time. Plus it makes more sense for Google to be as responsive as possible based on searchers' expectations. Just look at the recent news on indexing Twitter for proof of that: https://www.stonetemple.com/how-does-google-index-tweets-today-how-the-new-twitter-deal-will-impact-seo/
Cheers!
Hi Mase. Are you getting errors on URLs you've submitted? Or ran other crawlers on your site like Xenu or ScreamingFrog to produce any possible errors? It's also good to know which pages might not have enough content to be indexed: filters, sorting views, etc.
It sounds like the scenario you're describing isn't an issue of the URLs changing, but more so content shuffling within given URLs. This is VERY common. Google even promotes this with the Website Optimizer as they understand that a users experience with a website can vary from user to user, and having the flexibility to change to meet a specific user's needs is a good thing not bad. Unless the shuffling is dramatically affecting your own search traffic goals, I wouldn't be too concerned with it. Mostly I'd recommend strong categories for your pages that target your key search demographics and the archival of pages that have come and gone in their voting cycle. That way you'll have plenty of static content to work with as well.
Doubtful. Several sites mentioned on their clients page are showing numbers in OSE. Try out a few from: https://sucuri.net/clients/. Chances are you have a robots.txt issue blocking OSE, the site is brand new, or it's on a tld domain that is currently not compatible with OSE, such as http://example.website If you list your site here more details could be provided. Cheers!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yandex The webmaster tools it hosts are free: https://webmaster.yandex.com/ Just another search engine based service to help with crawling, linking and miscellaneous tools. If your site is non-international it's probably not much of a worry as they're mostly a Russia-based search provider.
Matt-Pop has some good data on using Ping tools to help accelerate changes that he discusses here: http://moz.com/community/q/new-site-pages-are-indexed-but-not-ranking-for-anything and here: http://moz.com/blog/can-you-disavow-out-of-penguin-whiteboard-friday#comment-315319
In general though Google knows about the link if the page linking to you is showing up in their index. Just run a search on the page URL itself to find if that's the case. GWT is very slow at reporting links in comparison to how quickly the search index operates. Cheers!
Monica's answer is correct. Here's the link to Google's own description of this behavior: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35624?rd=1. Worth a read!
Hi Tyler. You can use a text browser like Lynx as that's a close approximation of how Google "sees" your site. From: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/40349...
Use a text browser, such as Lynx, to examine your site. Most spiders see your site much as Lynx would. If features such as JavaScript, cookies, session IDs, frames, DHTML, or Macromedia Flash keep you from seeing your entire site in a text browser, then spiders may have trouble crawling it.
And a more robust list of guidelines is available here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769.
OSE also clusters by domain, so for a given link you're not going to get near the 700+ which are internal. As a general practice OSE is great for getting at link diversity, goal setting, and seeing where the competition has gotten links in the past. It should give you plenty of ideas that way. Cheers!
This post is fairly extensive in regards to your question and should give you ideas even beyond what you're asking here, http://moz.com/blog/hosting-and-embedding-for-video-seo but if you're looking for the highlight, this is still pretty applicable advice today:
Embed the content with HTML5 and JavaScript or Flash, but not an iframe
Unfortunately, Google are not very good at crawling iframes at the moment; so if you want videos to be indexed, you need to make sure you’re embedding content in an HTML5 player with Flash fallback, or a pure Flash player.
If the video is being embedded on your own site you can also create a transcription for it on the same page and then place the links in according spots. Cheers!
I would be pretty strict on using tools like these myself as you'd want to make sure you avoid creating pages that are too link heavy and begin to get a spammy feel to them. In some cases it could be quite handy though if you're trying to link up older pages that have very specific product names that would point to specific product pages. Like many tools, it can be used poorly or well.
Hi Peter. One problem you're going to run into is that people searching for the term laptop have a higher percentage chance of their search being an informational search than purchasing search. This is partly why you'll see Google displaying news, image, and related search boxes for example afterwards. They know that the term is so broad that people will most likely need to refine their search before getting to a result you want. For you this means a few things as far as how competitive it is...
As such, you'll likely want to refine your goal keyword. What makes your laptop unique? How would a customer interested in your laptop describe your laptop? Things like that will help you refine your term as well as prepare your site for your future customers. Cheers!