Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Tom,
Do you have any mark up data in place on the UK site?
It just seems curious that it is pulling the product data for the UK site and not IE. It could be the case the the mark up data is not in place on the IE site or if it is that Google has yet to implement this data in the search results.
Rikki
Morning,
It would seem your site is already dealing with the issue as it has a canonical tag for the URL you posted pointing back to http://www.trespass.co.uk/camping/festivals-friendly/clothing
After the actual URL (http://www.trespass.co.uk/camping/festivals-friendly/clothing?Product_sort=PriceDesc - which is a price sort version of the canonical page above) the &utm_campaign=banner&utm_medium=blog&utm_source=Roslyn section is simply tracking data for Google analytics and shouldn't have any effect on your SEO.
Rikki
Hi Andrew,
Just to clarify your question - do you mean if you you optimise a page, e.g. a category page, will your internal subsequent pages, e.g. sub categories pages, do stronger as a result?
Rikki
Hi guys,
Thanks very much for the responses. I guess my gut feeling was right that everything would come back to normal but just needed some reassurance.
I have made real progress with this client going from an online brought in revenue of £15k per month at the start of the year to £105k last month but it is all phone based so at the moment his call centre is like a ghost town - its a shame that can happen when a developer is trying to block his own dev sub domain and ends up blocking the whole thing. Just hope it doesn't take too long.
We will certainly try the social media route to see if that speeds things along.
Hello,
A client of mine is going through a bit of a crisis. A developer (at their end) added Disallow: / to the robots.txt file. Luckily the SEOMoz crawl ran a couple of days after this happened and alerted me to the error. The robots.txt file was quickly updated but the client has found the vast majority of their rankings have gone.
It took a further 5 days for GWMT to file that the robots.txt file had been updated and since then we have "Fetched as Google" and "Submitted URL and linked pages" in GWMT.
In GWMT it is still showing that that vast majority of pages are blocked in the "Blocked URLs" section, although the robots.txt file below it is now ok.
I guess what I want to ask is:
Thanks in advance!
Thanks Gianluca.
Yeah we implemented cross site hreflang tags on the US site also.
I thought the site strength / DA would be the issue as the US site has been established much longer. It has a 42 DA compared to the EU 30.
Getting the EU DA to 'overtake' the US in order to outrank it in the UK (and other EU countries) seems like a longer process though. It is a shame there is nothing else we can do to resolve this quicker really.
Thanks Gianluca, I have done that too with the EU domain to all the specific countries.
One quick question though. There is a separate US domain (the original domain of the country) which outranks the EU domain in the UK on nearly all occasions.
Apart from the rel="alternate" hreflang="x" tag what can we do with the US domain to ensure the EU domain ranks in EU countries?
Thanks, this is what I thought but it is always good to get an outside opinion encase there is something I am missing!
Hi Chris,
Things link your robots.txt file, on page optimisation etc aren't screaming out any major issues like you are reporting so I don't think you are going to find a specific, easy to see, reason for your drop and have an overnight answer unfortunately.
There was also a Panda update in March. Given your two drops were around dates with Panda updates that would signal a bit of a warning.
As Matt suggested I would do a full analysis of your link profile and look to lessen the keyword rich nature if that is the case.
Rikki
Hi Rob,
This is a tricky subject and I have a client with a similar issue.
We added the rel="alternate" hreflang="x" tag in the head section as suggested here http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=189077 but the results are not conclusive as yet.
I would be keen to hear other peoples thought on this subject too.
Rikki
Hi Chris,
There were in fact a couple of Panda updates in November 2012, it may be worth looking into these to see if either could have effected you. More details at: http://www.seomoz.org/google-algorithm-change#2012
Hello Chris,
Before I have a quick look when did you website stop ranking? Was it sudden or have you lost your rankings slowly over time?
Hello,
I have a client who's home page redirects to /default.aspx - what are the possible SEO impacts of this?
As the home page redirects to /default.aspx and does not load under both there does not seem to be a duplicate content issue.
Also the redirect should carry over most of the link juice from the home page to /default.aspx therefore are there any negative SEO "side effects" of this set-up?
Thanks in advance!
Hi Neil,
Glad my response gave you some encouragement! 
Whenever something changes in SEO there is always a massive over exaggeration that something is dead or no longer works but the truth normally is we have to tweak the way we work rather than revolutionise.
Don't fully write off your 'traditional' methods yet, yes invest more time into content marketing but find a balance between the two.
The directory, social, article, commenting all still 'work' but you just need to be a bit more strict with the websites you chose to do this with (make sure they are 'good' quality sites) and if you are commenting or submitting a piece to them make sure it is of good value to their audience, isn't nonsensical and non duplicated.
That's my opinion anyway and no-one yet has convinced me that doing the 'traditional' methods of link building don't have any benefit any more or will penalise you if you take a professional and common sense approach.