Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Don't try to edit old one. Let read old version to Google. You need to add new property. You don't need to worry about old property. Due to 301, Google auto ignore your old version.

New address is better than 302 or 301

Use this code -
Disallow: /*.f$
If you want to block only one folder then use this -
Disallow: /folder1/.*f$
This rule will help to block both files only .pdf and .gif

If you take links from c class ip sites which are handled from the same company/owner, then it is harmful. if owner/company is different, then no problem.

Is your site appeared with brand name and domain name? If no then share your domain name or if yes, then update with unique keyword which don't have any other page.

No, you don't need to do that. Moz auto pick your site as https.

First do one thing - Roll back what have you done with webmaster tool. Mean you don't need to change with old property as http to https. When GWT show your site with old property then create new property with https. Your problem would be solved.

No need to add meta description for the same pages because Google pick content for description from your page auto. So just remove meta description and meta keyword tag from that pages.

Hi All,

I think nobody know anything about my question. So Now i have solution of my question. This is the solution - http://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/how-to-set-up-pagination-rel-next-prev/ if any body suffer like me.

Thanks

Rajesh

Hi Imjonny,

As you know google crawl all pages without creating any sitemap. You don't need to create html sitemap. Xml sitemap is sufficient to crawl all pages. if you have millions pages, You need to create html sitemap with proper category wise and keep upto 1000 links on one page. . As you know html site map is creating for user not Google, So you don't need to worry about that too much.

Thanks
Rajesh

Hi SEO Masters,

Google is indexing this parameter URLs -

1- xyz.com/f1/f2/page?jewelry_styles=6165-4188-4184-4192-4180-6109-4191-6110&mode=li_23&p=2&filterable_stone_shapes=4114

2- xyz.com/f1/f2/page?jewelry_styles=6165-4188-4184-4192-4180-4169-4195&mode=li_23&p=2&filterable_stone_shapes=4115&filterable_metal_types=4163

I have handled by Google parameter like this -

jewelry_styles= Narrows  Let Googlebot decide

mode= None  Representative URL

p= Paginates  Let Googlebot decide

filterable_stone_shapes= Narrows  Let Googlebot decide

filterable_metal_types= Narrows  Let Googlebot decide

and Canonical for both pages - xyz.com/f1/f2/page?p=2

So can you suggest me why Google indexed all related pages with this - xyz.com/f1/f2/page?p=2

But I have no issue with first page - xyz.com/f1/f2/page (with any parameter). Cononical of first page is working perfectly.

Thanks
Rajesh

You can redirect all images on a new path. It will not hurt you.

Hey,

You don't need to delete any thing. Just go SC and use as default. If you already used canonical tag, you don't need to worry for the same.

Thanks

Rajesh