Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Upon running a link report on a website, there are often multiple links flagged as bad or suspect that come from a blog that is integrated into the website, which means there are links (set up as article tags) in the site that go to other pages in the same site. They have likely been flagged due to their high frequency. A similar problem is occurring where blogs from a connected site (from an offshoot site of a company that is part of the original) are also tagging their blog posts to link into the original website. Should these links be disavowed? Will these links have an effect on the website if they are disavowed or not?

Why do 301 redirects come up in the crawl error report when these are not technically a bad thing?

Is this just to make you aware that they are there?

Thanks.

When the report is downloaded it often comes up with multiple URLs in some of the boxes on excel, is there a way to download this differently to avoid this, or is there an easy way to separate the URLs within the boxes?

This tends to come up under "URLs with Duplicate Title Tags", and is very hard to read and analyse.

Thanks,

Rachel

I want to archive one of my campaigns, but need to know if I will still be charged for this whilst it is archived as I would if it was running as normal?

Many thanks Andy.

I am working on a project where the client has a main .com site and the following additional sites which are all interlinked:

.com site targeting US
.com site targeting China 
.HK site targeting Hong Kong

All sites contain similar information (although the Chinese site is translated). They are not identical copies but being shopping sites, they contain a lot of similar product information.

Webmeup software (now defunct) showed that the inbound links to the main site, from the additional domains are considered risky. Linkrisk shows them as neutral.

The client wants them to be interlinked and would not want to remove the additional domains as they get a good amount of traffic. In addition, the messages and products for each country domain have been tailored to a degree to suit that audience. We can rewrite the content on the other domains, but obviously this is a big job.

Can anyone advise if this would be causing a problem SEO wise and if so, is the best way to resolve it to rewrite the content on the US and Hong Kong sites?

Alternatively would it be better to integrate the whole lot together (they will soon be rebuilding the main site, so it would be an appropriate time to do this).

Many thanks Andy.