Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Seems the current answer is mostly 1) Be a big brand 2) have a Wikipedia entry for your brand and 3) possibly Schema markup.
Here's a couple related posts on the subject:
https://foxtailmarketing.com/company-information-now-displaying-in-google-serps/
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-pop-up-information-box-18007.html
What call tracking platform are you using? Most of them will let you keep you main number (which is likely the GMB #) and continue to show that to the Bots while showing a different phone number to users based off of what groupings you've set up (i.e. one # for organic, one for PPC).
Replytocom is a native WordPress error that can be a bit of a headache. I actually just answered a similar question about this a few days ago. that question was partially about Disqus but is still relevant. Here's the answer from that one:
Ah, Wordpress. The Replytocom parameter is an annoyance but can easily be fixed. Its not so much that removing Disqus is causing Replytocom... Disqus was just masking its presence. Replytocom exists as part of the native WordPress commenting system. Go to Webmaster Tools > Crawl > URL Parameters. Choose to Edit Replytocom, choose "Yes: Changes, reorders, or narrows page content", under How does it affect page content you can choose Other, and then choose to have Googlbot crawl No URLs with this parameter. You can also add replytocom to the Robots.txt for the blog to disallow it. And If you're using Yoast there's an option under SEO > Permalinks to remove ?replytocom variables. From Getting replytocom error when removed disqus comment system i want to remove the disqus
That sounds to me like they're holding your accounts hostage and/or telling you that your pages are being linked to as part of a linking scheme under their control which would no longer point said links to your social pages if you left them. You should definitely have them elaborate a little further on what a "Master SEO account" is because it sounds like BS.
I wouldn't add a canonical from a Tag archive to a post (especially if there are multiple posts in the Tag archive).
The SEO value of Tags (and Categories) comes from them creating a hierarchy in your site as well as creating relevancy signals between all of the posts that appear in that Tag archive. If you have 596 tags and there are tons that only have 1 post in them then those one post Tags aren't helping you. You may need to consider cleaning up your tags, checking traffic and ranking for your tags, re-tagging posts to the most relevant tag with good traffic and/or rankings, deleting the useless non-relevant tags, and placing 301 redirects from the removed Tags to relevant tags.
We're currently going through the same steps on one of the sites I work for but in our case there are only 274 tags to deal with.
Its the little touches like that which help make this place feel more like a community rather than just another website.
I'm more a fan of Branding than I am of EMDs. In my opinion, building up a following and name recognition is better than having a domain name perfectly targeted to your core keyword. I mean, unless you can have both. While CheapQualityLaptops.com might have good estimated traffic, might be the keyword you want to rank highly for, might be everything you think you need in life.... More people will remember Apple, Razer, HP, Dell, Compaq, Alienware, etc. because they built up the name recognition. Imagine if Apple's website was AffordableMacintoshComputers.net instead of Apple.com or if Verizon Wireless went with _PersonalPortableCellularDevices.org _... who knows, maybe those have good traffic. But a year, two years, five years down the road, people should remember you for your company's name not your keyword rich domain name. They'll be more likely to link to you with your company name and tell people to look up your company name in searches online.
When on the crawl diagnostic page there is the column that says the number of duplicate URLs. If you hover over the little i symbol then the popup will show the other URLs. Also, if you download the CSV of the report there is a column called Duplicate Page Content which lists the URLs.
Edit: Unless I completely misinterpreted what you were asking and you want to know how to find out the exact words or meta that is the same across them all. In which case, Moz usually only picks up duplication of Title Tags, Meta Description and the actually page content. So if they're flagged as duplicates its just a matter of reading the pages or giving them a quick glance to see how similar they are.
Promoting a post technically boosts it for an entire day now (used to be 3 days). So you'll reach your fans with a Sponsored post whenever they happen to log on in that 24 hour period and look at their Newsfeed. Same goes for if you're using the targeting feature to reach the friends of fans or if you're using one of the other targeting features likes location, age, gender, etc.
If you want a better idea of what time your fans are online, the updated Facebook Insights for a page now shows a graph of what times of day your page's fans tend to be online. If you have the new Page Insights, click into insights then go to Posts and there will be a section called "When Your Fans Are Online".
Same products, same copy, etc,?
If you want Page A to no longer exist and Page B to replace it in the SERPs then use the 301 to send people to Page B and pass link equity/seo juice.
If you want Page A to continue existing but you want Page B to potentially replace it in SERPs, use rel="canonical" so that Page A may still be found and visited but pass equity to Page B which will/should eventually replace Page A in the SERPs for the terms where Google feels your canonical suggestion is completely relevant.
If you're on the ads manager page, "email support" is on the left navigation.
As for merging pages, when you request to merge pages they're supposed to be pages for the same thing and with a similar names as well... so depending on how different the name is after the rebrand, that may not work. Also all content, posts, and photos of the old page get deleted... only the likes and check-ins merge into the new page.
Have you tried combining them into one? e.g. name="description" property="og:description" content="My meta description copy."/>
Should be every week on or around the day of the week that the campaign was created, if I'm not mistaken. I get my updates every Friday afternoon except for one campaign that updates on Tuesdays.
Edit: And because I forgot that function was added, when you're in your account if there's a tab on the right side of the screen that says FAQ... you can click that and then click a whole bunch of different things to get those answers directly. Trying it out now when I click on the week listing it pops up "Q: How often will my site be crawled? A: We crawl your site once a week, usually on the same day each week. For example, if you set up a campaign on Monday, the first crawl will be done on Tuesday and all of your subsequent crawls should complete on Tuesday going forward."
Facebook Insights already has a way to export data into an excel spreadsheet. All you need to do is click into Insights and in the top right corner there's the Export Data button. Choose the data type, choose either .XLS or .CSV, select the date range and click download.
If you're looking for a way to automatically pull the data into an existing spreadsheet, append the information to the existing data and automatically update formulas... then I'm at a loss. My excel talent stops at conditional formatting & filters. 
If people are only occasionally typing in "/troussers" instead of "/trousers" then let it 404. Its there to let people know "I'm sorry, this isn't here. Perhaps you misspelled something." You could always 301 it if you really felt like it because it wouldn't hurt anything in the long run.
Now, if you found that you're sending 500 people a day to a 404 page for "/troussers" when they're looking for "/trousers" and you find there are relevant inlinks pointing at the wrong page then by all means go and 301 those people to the correct page. They'll be better served by it. But if you're redirecting all of those people to "All Categories" then you aren't being thoughtful of the customer's needs.
Indiscriminately 301ing everyone to "All Categories" without considering what their intentions are is not helping that customer and will likely wind up with an ever increasing bounce rate on "All Categories".
This just reminds me how much I hate the Top of Page 2. Its one thing to be further down in rankings and know I need to put in the extra effort, its another things to be trapped at the top of page 2 and wracking your brain to figure out why sometimes a page just won't break that ceiling.
I don't know if its common practice but its not a new fix. Never heard of there being any issues with doing it that way (at least no one has ever told me this suggestion threw other errors for them if it has).
Wholeheartedly agree on that one. You don't hear that often enough and from enough people. May not be as quick as typing a few things into AdWords and hoping for good results but we've found some great terms just by listening to people.
First off, just to be certain.... are you sure they aren't currently missing because of the service disruption Facebook was having for a good hour or so today?
Also, Did the email account(s) associated with the Page as Admins receive any notification of the page's removal?
This exact thing happened to me after SEOMoz switched to a new method for determining duplication issues a few weeks ago. After the following crawl my numbers went back to normal though. Double-check the pages against Webmaster tools to make sure they aren't actually showing as duplicates and if WMT doesn't show anything wrong then give it a week and you should see your numbers returning to normal in the next crawl report.
