Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I am also unable to create a new campaign, each time I try it redirects me to http://analytics.moz.com/manage-campaigns Please can someone help Thank http://analytics.moz.com/manage-campaigns

Hi Benny! I am not sure what happened to your email from the 18th but I did see the one submitted yesterday. I'm afraid Erin's earlier response on the 18th identified the issue with your campaigns. We are not finding keywords in the top 50 for your September campaign due to the URL set to only track the root domain because your site is ranking as the "www" version on the SERPs. This is indicated below the campaign settings where it says "tracking only this subdomain" which is set by checking the box to "exclude subdomains" from the setup process. This means if you are ranking as www.domain.com, we are actually looking for domain.com If you setup a root domain URL without checking the box to exclude subdomains, this will act as a catch-all to pull rankings for all versions of the site, www or non-www. This is why the May campaign is showing ranking keywords because we are "tracking all sites at this domain". Hope this helps!

Yep, that's perfect! Let us know how you get on.

Hi there It sounds like you've got all the basis covered.  To avoid any form of duplication, it is important to redirect the old version to the new URL as soon as possible, preferably simultaneously when the new blog is published.  That will ensure the two won't be indexed together, plus it makes sense that an updated would be redirected. There are other methods as well - you could simply remove the old blog post page and return a 404 (which isn't a bad thing), update the canonicals like you say or add a robots instruction to prevent the page from being indexed.  But I think a 301 redirect here would be best, as it would pass on any link equity (no matter how small) the previous page did earn, it's one of the quickest methods to remove old pages from the Google index and for continuity's sake I think it makes sense too. The fact that you're changing the old post in a substantial way might mean that you could potentially keep both versions on your site, but only you'll be the judge of how unique it is.  I think, to remove any doubt, you should use the 301. Hope this helps.

You can still utilize this form of rich snippets using XHTML _"In general, RDFa uses simple attributes in XHTML tags (often  or _ ) to assign brief and descriptive names to entities and properties." https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146898?hl=en&ref_topic=6003477 Simply update your site it is not a hard thing to do I would recommend using an HTML 5 boilerplate things are only going to get better for HTML 5 sites and Harder for HTML 4. if it will not validate using HTML 4 and you are not comfortable trying to get it to work even using googles highlighting tool which allows you to highlight rich snippets or schema then place it into your website. https://support.google.com/webmasters/topic/3068649?hl=en&ref_topic=4600447 http://help.simplytestable.com/errors/html-validation/there-is-no-attribute-x/there-is-no-attribute-itemtype/ use an HTML 5 Bpoiler plate if you keep having problems. http://html5boilerplate.com/ All the best, Thomas