Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks Martijn,

I put the question out on Google+ communities as well & it looks like that was the general consensus as well.

The only side I don't understand, is why it chose to show it only on the those first two listings & none of the others.

I'm guessing it's because the site & those individual pages are less authoritative in general.

Thanks for the response Oleg,

Great to see that there's other examples of these sitelinks out there on generic search phrases.

I do understand that you can only tell Google the sitelinks you don't want users to see, but is there any difference on these sitelinks, as to how Google determines to show them?

Hi all,

I have a question for everyone. Sitelinks have been around for a while now & I've always seen them when the search is for a brand's name.

However, today, when looking at the rankings for one of the campaigns we manage, we noticed there were sitelinks in the number #1 & #2 positions in Google (Australia) for the search term "Dance Costumes".

Whilst both the companies have Dance Costumes in their title, so do all the other results & so I don't see why it warrants the sites to be relevant via their brand name.
Note: The results are organic results, not paid results (where you can add sitelinks).

Firstly, has anyone seen this before (screenshot attached)?
And secondly, is there markup/schema that allows you to do this (none that I know of)?

danceCostumes-sitelinks.png

Thanks Chiaryn, I hadn't noticed the site not being canonicalized.

I'll fix now and try again

So basically I have ran the Moz Crawl Test tool twice for this url "bubblingwithenergy.info" and both times the report has listed 1 URL when there is obviously a lot more if you check the site.

My question is, why is the Moz Crawl only reporting 1 URL when there are heaps? Is there a possibility it is being blocked and if so what would be blocking it?

This website is using a CMS called Infusion and it is based off CMSMS (CMS Made Simple).

Any answers would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Hey guys, I know that this doesn't quite fall under this community, but I thought I'd ask anyway.

I've got a client currently who is an Electrician.

They're primarily electricians that offer a lot of services, such as air conditioning installations, LED lighting, Solar Panel & heaps more, currently I'm trying to properly categorise the Google Places listing.

I'm looking at other Google Places listings in the "Electricians Melbourne" type searches & many of them have Electrician as a category.

However, when I attempt to do this, I'm unable to get the same result.
Has anyone else seen this, or know why I can't get Electrician as a category & when others are?

Hi everyone,
I've been trying to find discussions on this topic, but I've only been able to find a couple of posts and they're a couple of years old now, so I'm looking for a more up to date answer.

I've been doing some research lately & I'm trying to get a gauge on how many internal links I should have ideally on my website before Google suggests that I'm trying to do the wrong thing.

I know previously it was suggested to keep it under 100, but, I did see Matt mention it on this video (http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-we-dropped-the-100-links-per-page-guideline-but-we-may-take-action-if-it-is-too-spammy-178197) that it's no longer 100 links, but his answer is vague (which is what it might come down to).

We're a digital marketing agency & ideally going to try write pages for our services targeted to each of the main cities around Australia & ideally they would all be linked in the footer of the website (with a nice layout, dropdowns, etc...).

Looking for other peoples thoughts & opinions.