Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi, In Example 1, each page should use self referencing canonical tags in addition to pagination tags.So for example: URL: http://urbania.pe/buscar/venta-de-propiedades **URL: http://urbania.pe/buscar/venta-de-propiedades?&page=2 ** <link rel="canonical" href="http: urbania.pe="" buscar="" venta-de-propiedades?&page="2""></link rel="canonical" href="http:> And so on..... In Example 2, for pages with pagination + filtering, canonical tags should point to the the relevant page of results without filtering. So for example: URL: http://urbania.pe/buscar/venta-de-propiedades?bathroomsNumber=2&services=gas&commonAreas=solarium <link rel="canonical" href="http: urbania.pe="" buscar="" venta-de-propiedades"=""></link rel="canonical" href="http:> URL: http://urbania.pe/buscar/venta-de-propiedades?bathroomsNumber=2&services=gas&commonAreas=solarium&page=2 <link rel="canonical" href="http: urbania.pe="" buscar="" venta-de-propiedades?&page="2""></link rel="canonical" href="http:> Hope this isnt too confusing Thanks, Matt

Hello JoaoCJ, My recommendation is to not allow internal search result pages to be indexed. You should block them from being accessed via the Robots.txt file and then request their removal from GSC. This is what Google recommends. There are always exceptions to the rule. However, best practices is all I can provide without knowing more about the situation, such as whether those internal search pages are an important part of your taxonomy (rare) or are also receiving significant, high quality organic search traffic (also rare).

Thanks, I guess I'll have to wait and see once we are out of the sandbox. If nothing chances I'll start suggesting changing that keyword. Thanks again

The solution to this doesn't need to be complicated. You should keep the H1 in place across all devices. To do so, set H1 size using EM, rather than the more traditional PX. Em is a scalable unit. An em is equal to the current font-size, for instance, if the font-size of the document is 12pt, 1em is equal to 12pt. Ems are scalable in nature, so 2em would equal 24pt, .5em would equal 6pt, etc. Ems are scalable and, therefore, mobile-friendly. I hope that helps.

Well After two weeks nothing has changed, Aptitus.pe is still on top of my brand results, making my ranking score go lower since is a different domain and no sight of sitelinks. Is there a way to get rid of that old domain?, no luck yet.

Howdy. Yes, canonical or 301 redirect would be your friend. How much time did you give google to reindex before your verdict was "canonical didn't work"? Also, have you "fetched as Google" after you've done canonical? Also, here is another question, why is having paginated version in SERPs bad? Another way to influence your inner rankings is internal links. When you link to job offers page, which link do you use? The one which has more links and more relevant anchor text will be more likely to show in SERPs. Hope this helps.

Hi Joao, One thing that you might try to do to differentiate the content from search engines' perspective is add schema markup designed for job postings. Schema helps search engines understand what the content on a page is or is describing, and you can specify things like: Date posted (do you have this information if you are pulling from a newspaper?) Experience requirements Hiring organization Industry Job location Job title The date the offer expires Adding this information will give search engines much more context about what the content is about, and may help your issue. Hope this helps!

Well It seems I can't no longer demote the link since as today the option has been removed from google console. Cheers.

I will agree with Eric on the maximum number of URLs you can add in one sitemap. Than you can add another sitemap and connect together. My idea is to create separate sitemap for blog, static content, main pages and ads. In my opinion, its ok to keep the URL in the xml site maps as far as the expired ad’s URL. Just a thought!

Not too big a problem to have slightly longer title. Just be aware that how they display in SERPs can affect CTR, which can affect rankings. You can use https://moz.com/blog/new-title-tag-guidelines-preview-tool to get a good view of that.

Hello! I think Dmitrii's response on this is quite valid, these metrics will vary across industries. Here is a post that does a good job of facilitating an answer to the basic question of how to define post engagement benchmarks. http://simplymeasured.com/blog/facebook-engagement-rate/ From what I've read about Facebook engagement rates it seems that for pages with under 10k likes the average is around 1%. For more popular pages it would seem that the average engagement rates only go down from there... Whatever you end up defining as the metric ratio you want to track, the average/benchmark will be derived from past posts and how well they have performed with the same engagement definition.