Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
It will probably be in the root folder for your site as .htaccess or in the vhosts folder on your server for your domain in the vhost.conf file, but not sure...I found this on the bluehost website that gives a good example of a 301 redirect:
https://my.bluehost.com/cgi/help/htaccess_redirect
It may be helpful in directing you where you need to look.
It looks like something is wrong with your redirect...what does your redirect code look like?
You should have a 301 redirect setup so that everything goes to one address, ie. www.jeremygower.com....so that no matter if they type index.html or www.jeremygower.com/ or jeremygower.com it all goes to the same place. Other than that, an easier method (and you should probably do both...just put a canonical tag on that page, then no matter what the main page will get the link juice.
And yes, it probably will - either way, you should fix it.
Thanks to both of you for confirming what I had believed.
We have 2 offices within 20 miles of each other, and we are getting ready to launch a facebook page (or pages)...
I'm not sure whether we should put up one page or two. One office is our 'corporate office', and the other a 'satellite' office, both are very much open for business, but there will never be a need to post something on one and not the other...the two locations are just too close for there to be a need for that. If something is relevant to one town, it is relevant to the other.
I am really leaning toward one page for both offices for many reasons, but it seems like facebook wants me to have 2 pages (ie. I can't put in more than one address).
Any help is much appreciated! Thank you!
I'm sure they have something worked out for their sake, but I'm not sure how it would penalize the website being checked if it is being scraped. Send a bunch of keywords to google and scrape their serps, they have no idea what site you are actually looking for.
Personally, it's only helped me as it's knocked down a couple of truly horrible backlink spammers in my niche...but I still think Penguin is bull. I should not be able to hurt competitors, period. And for all of those that say "A good backlink profile will trump the bad links"...that may be true for Amazon and SEOmoz, but for the Barbecue Restaurant in a Pop. 20k town on the interstate, it can mean disaster. It's bad enough with all of the fake reviews going around, but add in the fact that 20 bucks can get your competitor 20k bad links compared to their 5 good ones, it's going to make a huge difference.
Search engines cannot should not operate like this. They should be moving forward instead of backward, it's simply not fair to the real businesses that try to do good. They need to focus on rewarding the good instead of punishing the bad. Heck, regardless of fairness that's just good operant conditioning technique. Anyway, there's got to be a better way...
Sorry about that, I should have looked, was in a hurry...the good news is I found the one that I love!
http://www.selfseo.com/website_speed_test.php
Again, the main reason I like it is because I can put in my own website 10 times, so that it's not a fluke if it's slow/fast at a certain time...
Well, they're all going to be at different locations, going through different routes to get to your site. It can also make a difference what is the load on your server at the time. I like to use one that allow for multiple URLs like
http://seobyindia.com/tools/website_speed_test.php (just found on google, couldn't find the one i've used in the past)
This way you can get a good picture by doing 10 tests in a row...average them then there ya go. I had to do this when we moved servers to get an idea of the speed increase we received.
Hey, just wanted to let you know that I've made my own solution available on Codecanyon. I'm sure it will need some customization for most SEO's, but it works great for me...Hate to publicize on here about my own product, so dont want to share a link, but PM me if you're interested.
I used Joomla long ago, so not sure how much help I'll be...
But I'm 99% sure that Joomla does not do this inherently and if they did it would actually be a feed and not a duplicate page. My guess is that you either have a plugin that is putting those pages there or there is something funky going on with a mod_rewrite.
I'd also note that on your sitemap you can see that there are other duplicate page issues (yes, they even show up on your sitemap)...those pages with trailing slashes and without trailing slashes. There may be a way to fix those with a joomla plugin or you can check out http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/rewriteguide.html on tips on how to overcome the trailing slash problem.
Do not repeat it. The structure of web-design/price-cost-calculator is good and will get the keywords you want in the URL. On the other hand, if you lengthen it out and say the keyword again you'd be more likely to lose keywords in the URL because of how much of the URL google actually shows in the SERPs.
The drop in rankings could be just because you changed the titles. For some reason google doesn't like it when you change titles, perhaps because it signals them that you're trying to change them in order to rank?
Anyhow, I've changed titles on one of our home pages twice in the last 3 or so months. I wish I would have just left it alone...each time my rankings dropped, then started to climb. I'm basically where I was to begin with now before I changed anything and I'm leaving it alone now!
Anyhow, I'd make one more change to get rid of most of the duplicates and then leave it alone. That said, I like:
Upload Name - tag, tag - Brand (fileid)
I think they send all of the info they have to Google quarterly so you are talking about maybe 6 months before your competitors actually have a chance to bid.
/sarcasm
My guess is that you aren't going to find a lot of people paying $99 / mo for the service telling you they are worried all of their secrets are being stolen. I trust SEOmoz.
Heck, google can probably read your mind, they dont need SEOmoz 
an actual answer:
Here's the privacy policy, where SEOmoz says that it can give your information to parties dependent upon certain circumstances (ie. subpoena), but it doesn't say anywhere on _this_page about protecting or _not _disclosing your information that I can see:
I believe that bold/strong has minimal effect at best. USE HEADER TAGS! I haven't heard anything specific to what you're asking, but I'd venture to guess that Google will see font-weight:bold the same way they see <bold>tags. They are smart and I'm sure they've put in methods of accounting for the probably millions of sites that use things like (assuming that works, not sure).</bold>
Short story: I wouldn't worry about it, unless you can find direct evidence to the contrary. But, for goodness sake, use header tags!
I dont fully understand, but it sounds like you're trying to rank for specific keywords and rank for long tails of those keywords for each state? I'd categorize by state, then tag with the keyword.
Yeah, and we have no idea what's at play. I mean, if we look around the net and see who is abusing with CSS hiding and who isn't my guess is that 95% of people abuse it...and if I'm Google I'm going to go ahead and put it an automatic point deduction somehow based on how many of those I see, then hope that people who manually rate these sites 'undo' the auto deduction. At least, that's what would make the most sense.
I wouldn't risk it, but that's just me. I'm sure the alt tag in the h1 would do just fine and doesn't 'hide' anything...Although...you could certainly abuse that as well since it's mostly hidden, lol. Just use a flippin google fonts or a cufon font replacement and make it as close to what you want as possible. The less images the better! My competitor could easily make their h1 image into text and it would probably look even better than the image they use.
I get it, just not sure that it's 'ok' to do...anytime you're hiding something, it cant be good right? Anyway, I'd do something like:
<code># <img< span="">src="whatever.jpg" alt="whatever" /></img<></code>
That should work right? At least, I think it's your best bet. I will say that I do have competitors that do what you are wanting to do and some are higher than me in rankings, so...your call, but I wouldn't.
Why do they have to be H1?
Anyway...Matt Cutts says no CSS hiding!