Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks yea, that is what I'm talking about. With Google shopping being paid now it just seems like there has to be someone smart with a blog talking about ideas and new things with it. Thanks for the comment.

I am looking for the best blogs on Product listing ads and paid Google adwords. Let me know what you guys have for these

Thanks!

I have been seeing some ranking and traffic drops on sites I monitor corresponding with the update Dr Pete wrote about with less domain diversity in SERPs (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-bigfoot-update-aka-dr-pete-goes-crazy).

Does anyone have any practical advice as to dealing with this type of update. It seems like a lot of relying on Google to change the way the domain diversity falls and obviously trying to turn your site into more of the "big brand" that Google is favoring with updates like this.

Anyways, would love to hear what people think. Thanks!

I am working with a per page results refinement that stores a cookie on the users computer and then keeps that same per page as the user goes around the site. I was just wondering if that was true for Google bot or Bing bot as well. Will they keep the cookie or would they not be able to accept it. I just want to know as I dont want different urls created if they can keep the cookie.

Thanks!

I was on shared count and saw a URL that i have has  103 FB comments. I was wonder if there was a way to see those comments at all.

Thanks!

Im using a wordpress plugin to lazy load images so that the site speed is a lot faster. Will this mess up image seo? The code for the image looks like this (with the site taken out)

[

<noscript></p> <p> </p> <p>I see it has the 1x1.gif it loads to speed up page speed but does the fact the link is to the correct place make it ok?</p> <p>Thanks for letting me know</p></noscript>](http://.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/IMG_9477.jpg)

What is the best way to handle large product pages with many different refinement possibilities. Ex. hard drive - 40 gigs - black case  etc. All of these refinements add to the length of the url and potentially create crawling issues as the url is to dynamic.

I have seen people canonical all refinements and pages to the main cat page, I have seen others no follow certain refinements. Also in the SEOmoz crawling report it tells me that over two parameters is bad.

What is the best way to handle this?

Thanks

I am having a large amount of errors in the not found section that are linked to old urls that haven't been used for 4 years. Some of the ulrs being linked to are not even in the structure that we used to use for urls. Never the less Google is saying they are now 404ing and there are hundreds of them. I know the best way to attack this is to 301 them, but I was wondering why all of these errors would be popping up. I cant find anything in the google index searching for the link in "" and in webmaster tools it shows unavailable as where these are being linked to from.

Any help would be awesome!

I know it used to be 100 urls per page, but recently Matt cutts has said that they can count a lot more now.

I was wonder what you guys thought was how many was to many per page?

I ran into this same problem a little while ago.

First off if you have meta no index on them or block with robots.txt then it shouldn't be a big deal if they have duplicate metas or titles, but if you don't and Google simply hasn't indexed them then fixing it could be helpful. For this I have always tried to go by the rule of creating unique metas and titles in all situations. What I did was programatically have the page number auto added to the title at the end and the same with the meta.

Ex.

Title

Blue Widgets Page 2

Meta

Blue widgets are the best, buy them from us. Page 2

While this isnt exactly super helpful to the user it doesnt hurt either, and atleast it will help clear up duplicate meta and duplicate title problems which if you have on the Seomoz reports then you for sure have them in Google WMTs errors as well.

Hope this helps