Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi, If you have a separate mobile site with separate URLs, you shouldn't use regular canonicals, you should use the mobile version, called switchboard tags. This will indicate to Google that your mobile version is a mobile version and not simply duplicate content. You do want Google to be able to index your mobile pages as they have a separate smartphone crawler and a mobile index. To implement switchboard tags: On the desktop page, add: and on the mobile page, the annotation should be: This rel="canonical" tag on the mobile URL pointing to the desktop page is required. As far as the nofollow question: What I would recommend is that you redirect mobile user agents (which will include the Googlebot for Smartphone) to the mobile version (most relevant page, not just homepage) and redirect desktop user agents landing on your mobile pages to the desktop version. Always include an option to 'view desktop version' or 'view mobile version' so that users can choose to override the redirect. That link should also take the user to the desktop/mobile version of that page, not just the homepage. Hope that helps!

Our question was because of curiousity and being unpatient...We are not violating any review criteria we are well aware of their criterias.. Thank your very much for serving your time Frutiko Team

Honestly.... None of them. They're all terrible and will result in a second rate video that could have been created by anyone. You'll be much better off finding yourself a freelance editor or talented student who can created completely bespoke and customised content for you. While I appreciate budgets can be tight, you really will get what you pay for and I'd advise doing less higher quality content, rather than more lower quality stuff.

To the best of my understanding about seo, i consider applying the best practice. If you have a choice of applying best practice by avoiding nofollow from internal links then to my view you should apply that Refer case study from Tedster on :- http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4161726.htm

WIth reference to your question on edu & gov backlinks, it wouldn't be worth spending a lot of your effort on gaining them. Matt Cutts mentioned once in a video response that .edu & .gov backlinks do not necessarily worth more than .com links (http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/do-you-still-care-about-gov-or-edu-links.html). Besides, it is important to obtain more backlinks from sites related to your business/niche, as compared to getting backlinks from edu & gov pages which have no relation to your business/niche. It won't help much in building up your site's authority if you go for the latter.

Are you sure it says you "don't" have the canonicals? What section is it under? IE Warnings, Notices, etc.. ?? Because often times SEOmoz will tell you in Notices that you DO have canonical tags in place. This might be causing your confusion? It's not a report of a problem at all, just to make you aware.