Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Use H tags as they are meant to be used but if you can nicely embed your phrase within that would be great. How to use H tags? Same as you would with indentation structure of a bullet point list. Have them indicate document's topical structure.
For example:
-H1: Vehicles
--H2: Cars
---H3: Sedans
---H3: SUVs
--H2: Motorbikes
---H3: Dirtbikes
---H3: Roadbikes
----H4: Harley Davidson
---H3: Sportsbikes
----H4: Suzuki
-----H5: SFV650
------H6: SFV650 Engine Specifications
Likely it's not banned then - just not worth indexing. Chuck some decent content up there and you'll be fine 
It should be fine unless that site was banned in the past for some reason, though that's pretty easy to check. If your new website changes substantially in topic Google will likely recognise the change and not factor in domain's history. This is from what Google said at one point, not sure if anything changed since then.
There are several types of penalties (single keyword, all keywords, complete ban...etc). Search for your own brand and if you don't come up with anything than you're likely banned. Same thing with domain, site: command and info:
I have no difficulties, on Chrome with cookies enabled. What are you using?
All in moderation. Google always says "do what's best for your users" but I would stick to a single affiliate link per page to be safe if this was my website. Nofollow is a good way to link to sites you don't trust and I would say it would be applicable to affiliate sites.
Google updates public PR rarely these days... you could have a good site with PR0 for months so not a very good way to judge the risk or benefit that way. In fact if you have a history of buying links with same anchor text from high PR sites over a period of time you could trigger a penalty more so then with crappy little low quality links.
If I understand the question correctly you want to temporarily point people to the old domain while you wait for the new domain site to be launched and stay there permanently.
If the above is correct then solution is:
pre-launch: setup 302 from newdomain.com to olddomain.com
post-launch: remove 302 and setup 301 from olddomain.com to newdomain.com
This way people who visit the new domain from stationery and printed material will go to the old domain and still get the content they expect while Google will be informed this change is only temporary. After the new site is launched you break the temporary redirect and setup a permanent redirect directive towards the new domain and new site.
Stavros, PageRank can indeed hint at site's strength - many authoritative sites exhibit very high PageRank values and going up against them may be silly in some cases. However it's a workable situation...
If you see a site with PageRank 10 in the results yet their site lacks the phrase you're targeting in essential places such as title tag, content and inbound links (as part of anchor text) it may in fact be possible to beat them.
Basically relevance will beat authority. That's why Microsoft doesn't rank well for "Men's Shoes" despite their high PR.
Also PageRank is a raw importance value assigned to each individual page not to a phrase or other factors and is transmitted through links. One page gives other page it's PageRank by linking to it.
Hope this answers your question.
Positives:
In reverse, sites with higher reputation tend to get indexed deeper and more thoroughly.
Negatives: Splitting up link juice across many pages.
If this is your only way of link building (especially if you do 301 only) it will start looking suspicious, your site may get penalised on manual review. I am not that sure if Google have algorithmic trigger for this.
Lists of article hosting sites are available online however value of having the link from duplicate content is not as exciting as arranging unique blog posts or articles on different websites. If I was you I would perform this activity once per month and focus on other activities.
Correct. Each time page gets re-indexed pagerank flow will be recalculated.
We had the same case in the past, rewrote the URL and told Google the old URL was permanently moved. In one week the new page ranked instead. Once you've done this and other on-site bits go and earn some links as that will me a much more fruitful way of getting the page to a better position.
My vote goes to WordPress. We're using it for our own website and it's awesome. The best thing about it is a wide support network and numerous SEO plugins which will make your job much easier than any other CMS platform.
Eric are you using a content management system such as wordpress to run your website? If so then there will be functionality / plugins that handle this for you.
Good SEO practices apply for many search engines so if you do things by the book you should do well in all of them (unless we're talking about specialised ones). Bing and Yahoo run on the same engine so you should see similar or same results in both. Google, however, brings so much more traffic that we're internally not even looking at traffic at other individual search engines and instead treating it all as a) Google and b) "Other search engines".
More specific to your question, a good starting point would be to go through this:
Don't get me wrong - We've done both!
Creating satellite assets proved to me a nightmare for us on so many levels it's not funny. From using up resources, splitting up time for creating links across multiple sites to client complaining about the look and feel of all these microsites (they treat them as any other site). I've abandoned the method soon after that and put our resources in link, bait, content and whitehat link building. It gave us the results we needed.
To be fair I recognise some promotional items operators in Australia who have done microsites really well and benefit from it, however most of them have "fed" juice through the main corporate site. To me this is too close to a scheme for comfort.
Another point (this time against the method) is that you're missing out on branding and effectively creating natural links to microsites. If we look at all big brands, their microsites are campaign based. not designed to attract SEO traffic, that's the job of the main site.
There were no detectable inbound links to any of those pages before the pagerank update. What other signals could have affected it... content quality alone? By the way content was written using the same writer and same quality level.