Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I'm also still having the issue, thanks for revisiting it.

Thank you James

Hi,

Moz has flagged a whole lot of pages as dupe content, but I cannot see how they qualify as such.
Not sure if I'm allowed to post actual URLs here....happy to if I can, but I feel certain that the pages are not 90% similar.

Has anyone else had this experience?

~Caro

Thanks for that input Egol. Sounds logical.

I just read a great article on the SEO benefits of external links to relevant authoritative sites. But it didn't state if the benefits still existed if the external links were nofollows.
The article concluded: “Outgoing relevant links to authoritative sites are considered in the algorithms and do have a positive impact on rankings.”

I found this old article on the subject, but opinions on the nofollow issue were mixed:
https://moz.com/blog/external-linking-good-for-seo-whiteboard-friday

Can anyone shed any light?

Thanks! ~Caro

Thanks Egol,

Their site content is definitely good, so we're looking good on that front

Thanks for your feedback.

I have a client who's thinking of placing their blog on a separate domain because the plug-ins and various other functionality is becoming bulky and slowing things down for the main site.

There will be a 'Blog' link on the company's website navigation, just as there is now, that will take people to the blog.

As an SEO person, this seems like a bad idea, even if we set up 301s from all the old posts to all the new ones.

In my research I came across these two points:

1. All backlinks to blog posts contribute directly to a website’s OVERALL SEO strength because those backlinks are pointing to your main domain.  Removing them may reduce overall link juice to the site.
2. Simply having fewer content pages on the site will cause entire site to rank lower because Google loves content-rich authority sites.

Does anyone know this to be true for sure?

Thanks,
~Caro

I would view this a a usability matter. Where would someone expect to land after clicking on a link in an author bio? I would likely expect to land on your home page, or a good About me page.

Chances are, if it's a well set up bio section, it will be a nofollow link. So there won't be any benefits other than to the user who clicks on it.

~Caro

Thanks Kate...I think this will be our best option for now...differentiate the content as much as we can. I'll refer back to this thread when we're ready to move forward with foreign language pages next year.

Tom, thanks.

The company is small-med and is growing fast, with a presence in some other countries to handle business there as it grows. I think I understand how we have to handle the foreign languages. We may be able to go with ccTLDs as we introduce more languages instead of the subfolder we currently have for Germany only.

But the real issue that we're trying to zero in on is a small group of 'international' English pages designed for non-USA/Canda visitors that have some differences in how the free trial for the product is processed. We want to make it clear to Google that these are not duplicate content. We will be promoting them via advertising etc, but we still don't want them seen to be duplicated content.

Thanks,
Caro

Kate, although the pages are the same as the USA ones, there's no reason we cannot switch up the language a bit for countries outside the USA...alter the message a little. If we did, would we then be able to use hreflang to indicate to google that there's a different version of the pages for select other markets and prevent them from thinking it's duplicate content?

No, hardly at all.

There are two major phrases they all use, with modifiers at the end:
EG:
keyword
keyword solution
keyword software
keyword product
keyword download

etc

Kate,

What they have is:

1. a subfolder for the German content which has 6 pages that will be targeted to German speakers both inside and outside of Germany - which I'm assuming will need hreflang code specifying language but not country, right?

2. URLs for the English pages targeting English speakers outside the USA that are simply different page names. So:

USA page - www.company.com/product-A
Equivalent International page with different form - www.company.com/product-A-international (we've identified 5 countries we want to show up in, and then any other one by default)
And I'm assuming hreflang is not appropriate for the international page, but I'm not sure what one does  instead to avoid dupe content.

Does this help?

Kate, I've been on this all day and I think I need to rephrase my question. I've figured out that if the pages for the international audience are all English and have no real LANGUAGE variations, I don't need to use hreflang, correct?

The difference between the USA pages and the other English countries is that there is a slight variation in how the product licence is issued once they complete the free trial form. So the form processes differently from different pages.

So, with everyone seeing the same content (99% the same) on different URLs, what is the correct way to:
1. Indicate to Google the audience is in a different region
2. Prevent duplicate content issues.

Thomas when you say "This is the code you should add in a page's tag for the UK version of company.com would be:" are you referring to the code above or the code below? Because the code below refers to Germany. So I'm assuming you meant the code above that text, right?

To answer some of your questions:

The USA site is English only...no plans for Spanish yet.
The Canada site is English only...no plans for French yet.
For Germany customers we have some German pages in a Folder on our company.com domain

Kate should I use the tool twice...once for English speaking countries with no translation needs (UK, Australia etc), and once for foreign language pages (which will for now be in folders on our .com domain)?

I ran the tool for the scenario of delivering our English pages with international licensing info on them to English speaking countries outside the USA and it says:

• Don't use HREFLANG; you are not translating inside a country, so it's not necessary.
  Why no HREFLANG? Our german pages are translated for people in germany.
• Don't use IP detection for country targeting, but ask your customers to set a cookie.

How would I ensure Google doesn't see my intl. pages as duplicate content?

Thanks for all this info...looks like I have my work cut out for me this morning. Much appreciated.

Thank you! I'll check this out today!

Thanks for these resources Thomas...I'll take a look at them shortly.

My client is trying to achieve a global presence in select countries, and then track traffic from their international pages in Google Analytics.

The content for the international pages is pretty much the same as for USA pages, but the form and a few other details are different due to how product licensing has to be set up.

I don’t want to risk losing ranking for existing USA pages due to issues like duplicate content etc.

What is the best way to approach this? This is my first foray into this and I’ve been scanning the MOZ topics but a number of the conversations are going over my head,so suggestions will need to be pretty simple

Is it a case of adding hreflang code to each page and creating different URLs for tracking. For example:
URL for USA: https://company.com/en-US/products/product-name/
URL for Canada: https://company.com/en-ca/products/product-name /
URL for German Language Content: https://company.com/de/products/product-name /
URL for rest of the world: https://company.com/en/products/product-name /