Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Maaan, how you dare say pagerank is dead.
If you say is dead then you probably think backlinks are also dead because it's component are pagerank ( which maybe called juice) and trust.
I want to hear from you what you think about also backlinks .
Anyway, thanks for reply.
Cheers.
Hey guyz,
These days I'm reading the paperwork from sergey brin and larry which is the first paper of Google.
And I dont get the Ranking part which is:
"Google maintains much more information about web documents than typical search engines. Every hitlist includes position, font, and capitalization information. Additionally, we factor in hits from anchor text and the PageRank of the document. Combining all of this information into a rank is difficult. We designed our ranking function so that no particular factor can have too much influence. First, consider the simplest case -- a single word query. In order to rank a document with a single word query, Google looks at that document's hit list for that word. Google considers each hit to be one of several different types (title, anchor, URL, plain text large font, plain text small font, ...), each of which has its own type-weight. The type-weights make up a vector indexed by type. Google counts the number of hits of each type in the hit list. Then every count is converted into a count-weight. Count-weights increase linearly with counts at first but quickly taper off so that more than a certain count will not help. We take the dot product of the vector of count-weights with the vector of type-weights to compute an IR score for the document. Finally, the IR score is combined with PageRank to give a final rank to the document.
For a multi-word search, the situation is more complicated. Now multiple hit lists must be scanned through at once so that hits occurring close together in a document are weighted higher than hits occurring far apart. The hits from the multiple hit lists are matched up so that nearby hits are matched together. For every matched set of hits, a proximity is computed. The proximity is based on how far apart the hits are in the document (or anchor) but is classified into 10 different value "bins" ranging from a phrase match to "not even close". Counts are computed not only for every type of hit but for every type and proximity. Every type and proximity pair has a type-prox-weight. The counts are converted into count-weights and we take the dot product of the count-weights and the type-prox-weights to compute an IR score. All of these numbers and matrices can all be displayed with the search results using a special debug mode. These displays have been very helpful in developing the ranking system.
"
There are like 3000 duplicate titles which are canonicalized.
Well, what can I say question is on the title 
Do I still need to fix duplicate titles even though they have canonicalized?
Thank you mozzers.
I LOVE u guyz.
So you saying that if my page PR is 2 which is logarithmic based 100
And If I link from this page to another page which is PR 0 .
So what my contribution to the PR 0 page is you say 100/2=50. ?
Or just plain logic PR 2 / 1= 2 (Because there is only 1 link ) ?
It's probably AWS, which is amazon buyable crawl service.
If ıt costs you too much then try to ban it.
Hey moz fanz,
I'm here to ask a bit technical and open-minding question.
In the Google's paper http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
They say they parse the page into hits which is basically word occurences.
But I want to know that they also do the same thing while keeping the anchor text database.
I mean do they parse the anchor text or keep it as it is .
For example, let's say my anchor text is "real car games".
When they indexing my link with anchor text, do they parse my anchor text as hits like
"real" distinct hits
"car" distinct hits
"games" distinct hits.
OR do they just use it as it is. As "real car games"
Ov man, you always come tome with great ideas 
I never thought about that .
Thank you very much stay rock!
Thank you guyz,
Devanur You've got the point let me correct you at one point.
You can't say google that remove my index just using meta robots tag, because It can't read the meta tag till it crawl.
So only solution looks like .htaccess password protect.
Anyway thanks for your efforts.
Hey moz fans,
In the google getting started guide it says
**"
Note: **Pages may be indexed despite never having been crawled: the two processes are independent of each other. If enough information is available about a page, and the page is deemed relevant to users, search engine algorithms may decide to include it in the search results despite never having had access to the content directly. That said, there are simple mechanisms such as robots meta tags to make sure that pages are not indexed.
"
How can it happen, I dont really get the point.
Thank you
Hey guyz,
I want to ask a basic question.
If I search for Larry Page lets say.
I think google look for it's index for word larry and page distinct.
And mix it up.
But the question ;
Can google show a result which only Larry exist on the page but any of the synonym or the stem of the Page not exist .
If it can happen how this page can be showned in larry page query.
Thank you.
Hey guyz,
I know this "" operator to force the search results to include show the results what includes inside the operator exactly the same.
But when I do some google searches, some times google doesn't show the exact match what I wrote in the quote. Like this https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q="rfid+çözümleri+şuan"
I'm waiting for your replies,
Thank you guyz.
Hey guyz,
I've asked many question today but forgive me :D.
I just want to know is there anything wrong with this diagram http://mygreatname.com/google-pagerank/images/google-pagerank-algorithm-03.gif
Because page 1 has 3 outgoing links but you divided 2 and page 2 has 2 outgoing links but you divided only 1. Or do I miss something?
Thank you.
Hey I just want to know,
If I create a web page, is the pagerank of the page would be 1?
Hi moz fans,
I'm asking this question because I've faced this (http://thatsit.com.au/seo/tutorials/a-simple-explanation-of-pagerank)
Till now I know that when we link to a page we **don't **lose our PageRank, we just give a PageRank but not to lose it .
I mean let's say If we have a page PR 1, and another page B which is pagerank 0,
And If we give link a to page B from page A, At the end of the iteration, we have Page A PR 1 and Page B PR 0,85.
**But **he said above the link If we give a link to a page, it would result like this.
Page A PR 0,15 and Page B PR 0,85.
Which one is true ?
Thank you!
great explanation Alan, thank you!
I still didn't see any link to an image URL.
How can you see that, and where did you see that?
Hey guyz,
I know I ask so many questions these days but you know ...
Anyway;
I have a website which has only 22 pages and today I try to crawl it with screaming frog and then I face with many image internal link.
But the problem is I dont see any of them when look at the site and source code of the site.
So why does it happen ?
Is there any idea ?
Please share with me.
Thank you .
http://i.imgur.com/dtj7Ws7.png
