Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Armen, Taken into account that these mobile pages are not the AMP variant of them I would say this might become an issue. In the end you're improving the user experience but as you're doing it by creating two pages which are the same based on the content you're not doing the best from the SEO perspective. What I would do is look into using the canonical tags back to one of the two: either mobile or desktop. By doing that you'll make sure that there is only 1 variant of every page out there for SEO. Martijn.

Hey Armen, It can depend upon how you have it structured and what type of schema mark-up you have in place. Is it an aggregate review for the business or product as a whole or individual review from a customer/testimonial?. Also just because it the review shows by page for other search queries this does not mean it is broken for branded search to the homepage, Google kind of has the final say on if it chooses to show the snippet. Sometimes it might, sometimes it may not, it may also not show yours in favour of other sites thus not flooding the serps with stars everywhere.. Hope that helps. Tim

Have you tried Schema Creator by Raven? You would need a static home page to use it. It's been around quite a while but works very well. It will place a text box on your page that will be visible which is good since Google wants it that way. You would select the "Review" category. Best!

Lots of web sites with outstanding site visitors don't get that visitors without a doubt because their identify tags are artsy fartsy in place of being direct as like this.  The titles should be aligned with the hunt quantity.  Take a study key-word research for the comedian class, trouble titles, characters, and issues.

Hello, This was exactly my approach to this, and I feared it would be over optimization, however my top ranking competitor seems to be using both counties in their H1s as seen here:http://www.leifertlaw.com/ They also have a resources section linking to arguably pretty useful external links in their footer to links with nearly entirely duplicate content for each relevant town in their service areas: http://www.leifertlaw.com/delray-beach-criminal-lawyer-traffic-attorney.html This website's optimization should literally be illegal, and seems to be using tactics that are frowned upon...yet it is ranking on the first page for both our target counties. Should we still avoid using these methodologies?

Hi, I certainly wouldn't put the text into an image if you can help it, the more good on page content the better! The H1 tag describes what the pages is about, if the slider isn't 100% relevant, then being above the H1 is fine. If it is relevant, then you can always have the H1 above in the code, and then style it in CSS to be below the slider. Kind Regards Jimmy

Hi there You should be fine as long as you don't have 30 locations with the same structure, but I would work on your cleaning up your URL over optimization - maybe have an Areas We Serve page with office location information in different cities. I would check out this local SEO resource from Moz and Service Area Business from Google. You should also look into Whitespark and Moz Local as these will help you in categorized local citations and listings, especially if you have different offices in different cities. As long as the content is different (not just changing the city names in the content) then it shouldn't be an issue, but I would work on your local SEO and condensing information where possible. Hope this helps! Good luck!