Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Granit,
Has any work been done to the site in the last 2-3 months? Have you had any warnings in webmaster tools at all? I did once see a strange problem where Google wasn't crawling a site correctly because it had been compromised, but after checking, there is nothing like this on yours.
-Andy
In terms of writers, it depends what market they are in. You might find some that are specific to their industry (or maybe not). I have heard good things about Copify and know a few places that deal with them.
In terms of additional activities, the next best bang for buck will be to ensure all pages are targeting phrases correctly (meta, titles, etc), but you are likely to get the most from a solid link-building campaign. Have you also thought about creating them a Wikipedia page?
You can also read what Google suggest on how to tackle this problem here
Basically, you can add a rel=canonical tag to both a PDF and HTML documents to help overcome this issue.
Andy
I think that as long as you no-follow the links so that Google doesn't think you are trying to gain benefit in this manner, then it should be fine. The links as you suggest, are towards the bottom of the page, and Google should see this - perhaps mention that the blog posts will open on a new site and keep the anchor text neutral.
"For More Information, Please Check Out These Posts on our Blog (__Opens up new site)"
-Andy
It doesn't look like a firewall, as I can crawl it with Screaming Frog. However, the server logs will be able to answer that one for you.
Without looking in depth, I'm not seeing anything that stands out to me - do you think that there have been changes to the server that could cause issues? What firewall is the server running? Also, if there were errors in crawling the site, you would see a warning about this.
-Andy
Everyone is always going to have different approaches Brian 
But just in terms of budget, Matthew's client has around £15k per month, which sits very firmly in the 6-figure region.
Like yourself, I can only speak from experience of what has worked for my clients. Diversity is what makes the world go round
If you are noticing a slip Colin, it might help to see if this coincides with an algorithm update. Rarely will a site drop in the SERPs for no reason, and having a blog isn't going to do this on its own.
Have you had a look for issues that might relate to Panda or Penguin? How much SEO have you been doing? Do you think you might have been trying too hard?
It can also be because other sites are performing SEO while you have just been writing blog posts, you might have missed an update that required some additional work.
There are so many possibilities why this can be, but it is always worth starting with a look at the ones that cause the most issues.
Andy
Gary has pretty much hit the nail on the head. What you are proposing doesn't sound like it would cause any issues. Google are smart enough to know that sometimes there is a crossover of content. It might be a different story if every page was the same, but as I always advise in these situations, use a little common sense and think:
Make sure the page is well produced, questions clear and answers concise.
-Andy
Hi Rachel,
This is similar to another question asked just yesterday and the same could apply very well to yourself too.
HREFLANG is used in cases like this where a site could encounter duplication issues through this kind of setup. There are two areas to look at and consider here - this answers your question if you decide to keep all TLD's the same.
**Q: <a name="q16"></a>Can I use “rel alternate hreflang” across domains / across TLDs?
A: **Yes! Keep in mind that this markup is on a per-URL basis, so if there are alternate URLs across those domains, you would need to add the markup for each individual URL.
You can get many questions answered here: https://sites.google.com/site/webmasterhelpforum/en/faq-internationalisation#q16
If you decided to pull everyting into just one site, then this would fit what you want to do:
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en
In terms of inter-linking, this seems to be down to the whim of Google, if they wish to see it as problematic or not. If you are concerned about it, leave the links in place and just add the rel=nofollow attribute - this will remove possible issues.
I hope this helps.
-Andy
Hi Geraldine,
Have you had a look at traffic in Analytics and confirmed that it is the final purchase stage that isn't happening? Or is it that traffic to pages aren't moving through to the product pages? Is this a new problem, or is it something that has just started? Have there been any changes to the site recently?
In these circumstances, I find that using something like Crazy Egg also helps to diagnose what is wrong as this will give you a heatmap of how the page is being used. This can be quite an eye opener!
-Andy
"In my opinion the PR services have been infiltrated by a lot of spammers who wear suits to work."
What a fantastic way of putting this Egol 
Just be a little cautions with info dating back to 2006-2007. You can't rely on that now.
I see what you mean - it is a bit messy. It appears to be using the ALT tag for the logo as the first part of the description?!
It's something I would need to spend time on to try and get to the bottom of I'm afriad - however, you might find someone else with more schema experience can diagnose in a second. You may have to wait to see if someone else chips in a little later.
-Andy
Hi,
Brand is very important to Google now, and you need to shout about it as much as you can and it can help with a number of factors, especially now Google has said that Brands will gain dominances in the SERPs for related searches.
Rather than turn this into a huge thread, have a read of this article, which looks at many aspects of what Google is doing to branding now:
http://socialmediatoday.com/georgestevens48/1317336/google-rewriting-page-titles-time-brand
-Andy
Hey Vince,
I remember reading that when it was posted.
Do you have an example if a page with an outbound link that has been nofollowed? I would like to take a look at this myself. Do you have a rel=nofollow tag on the outbound links at all?
-Andy
I would personally, but not for any SEO benefits or trying to hide anything to Google. Just because I can and stops people snooping.
-Andy
Hi,
It sounds to me that some internal linking and no-indexing Tag pages could help with this.
Just doing a very quick scan of the site, I am seeing 439 pages that Google can crawl - 210 of those pages are Tag pages. These tend to fire Google off in all directions and serve no good SEO purpose. However, some like this, but I have seen them cause more problems than doing good.
If the opportunity arises, talk about related blog posts and then link to it - you would be surprised just what this can do for you.
-Andy
This is a subject where you are going to get a lot of disagreement and I think that the guy who insists on having HisBigAssCompany on the front end of the title tag will argue a lot louder and longer than I do.
Amen to that
I don't agree at all with having brands at the front - not needed, but when Google appends it with this, there isn't a lot you can do, sadly. If you see a Brand: <title></strong>, then you know Google have been doing their thing.</p> <p>-Andy</p></title>
I think that putting two hours of work into this opening single paragraph could help you rank better in the search engines because I do believe that Google demotes poor copy
^^ This!
Spend a bit of money and hire a professional copywriter to help out if you need to. It can work wonders!
Do you have the page with the link in it for me to take a look?
-Andy
I wouldn't say it's necessarily normal, but it certainly isn't uncommon. I do see this sort of thing quite a lot, and oddly enough, I see it most on internal pages.
Is there on-going work happening on the site? Are changes being made frequently? Have you also tried other tracking apps, as I do know that some are not quite as accurate as others and report differently.
-Andy