Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I have made a test site, i used CSS, where you can have one set of css for screens less that a certain width, and 1 for wider pages. you will also need the metat tag below that will set your page to the correct width for each phone.

So when a mobile comes to the page, its sets a width lets say 320px, then your css will take over (note: set to <850)

you can then set a layout for the small screen, this way you can have 2 layouts in the sdame page, and keep the rank, rather then having one page for browsers and one for mobiles

if you want to see it work, try this link, it is a simple example, and i have not tested it on a phone, (I am one of the few poeple in the world that does not have a mobile phone) http://news.thatsit.net.au/

.myclass{ for the main page }

@media only screen and (max-width: 850px)
{

.myClass{ for the mobile page}

}

do you mean pass a title in the query string so they have indervidual titles? yes that would be a good idea. Duplicate titles is a waste of prime SEO real estate

if when you choose a different page, the content changes significantly then of cause DO NOT use canonical tags.

Just came accros this article

http://searchengineland.com/search-trumps-social-for-local-business-information-104667

Assuming this pages are dupilcates.
then only one will rank, with a canonical you can choose what page that is, if you dont use a canionical then google will choose. if you have too many, then google may see that as bad,

If you have the text on the html, but only display it via script, that should be fine, as long as you do display it. If you dont you may eventualy get flaged for hidden keywords

Clcik start capture, then when youload page it will list all requests and their status codes

This sounds more like a case for a canonical tag,

dont exculed with robots.txt this is akin to cutting off your arm, because you have a spliter in your finger.

When you exclude use robots, link juce passing though links to these pages is lost.

I just did a cral on your site using Bings ToolKit, and i did not find any errors concerneing tittle.

In fact your site has the best score i have ever got from a wordpress site. Usely a wordpress site is a mess, especialy with un-necasary 301's

I found only 2 html errors, 1 un-necessary redirect and multiple h1.

Wait to next crawl it may come good.

He did ask for a perfect site, in that case yes, i would suggest hand coded with complete control. I agree with the trade of with cost of hiring a developer and the ease of DIY CMS, but to be perfect it should be bespoke no redirects, no html errors, no script or css mixed in html. well segmented with html5, described with microdata, prefect crawlability. You just can’t get all this done perfectly with CMS.

But i agree there are horses for courses

looks like you have dug yourselfs a hole.

you could with a bit of work, detect where the vistits have come from, and then show prices relevent to the vistis, you will not be done for clocking in this case. There is geo locating solutions out there for detection, and you could write a function that can sort price and then replace all the prices with the function something like @GetCorrectPrice(19.99)

As far as i can tell about clocking by the way, you dont get dome for clocking unless you are trying to decive, if they detect clocking the will have a human look and see why and what you are doing.

Yes it is duplicate content, and 2 urls that get to the same page is duplicate content, even upper and lowercase letters.
Depending one what server you have, you can force https on the pages you want encrypted.
If you have a windows IIS server, it’s a simple checkbox on the SSL page of the IIS control panel. Just browse to the folder you want and select SSL then check the checkbox,
If you have another type of server then you will have to have a look for yourself, but I am pretty sure it will be simular.
Another way around it is to use a canonical tag.

canonical would be best here. but you would want to do it with code, or use rewrite outbound rules on the server

I would  not worry about the sumery problem

If someone has just created a site with a CMS, it is hard to tell them it may not be a good idea. Its like telling them their kids are ugly.

You have a few link juice leaks thought un-nessasary 301's, every 301 leaks link juice.

This one occuers about 1,000 times that i found.
The link to "http://www.carbodypanels4u.co.uk/catalogsearch/result/" has resulted in HTTP redirection to "http://www.carbodypanels4u.co.uk/".

thats a fair bit of leaking that should be going back to your home page

You also have over 1,000 images without alt text, get some keywords rich text in them.

I suggest to role your own.

My philosophy these days is make sure your site crawls perfectly, use html5 and schema.org to tell the search engine what your site is about. Keep code clean from any script or css, no redirects or noindexing.

It is hard to gain the system by links these days, good content described semantically and clearly to the search engine seems to work well.

It is hard to describe your content using html5 and schema.org using CMS.

too many according to google. make of it what you will, does not look like it is for any technial reason anyymore, but obviously there is a limit to how much of page they will crawl.
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-many-links-per-page/

You see how page rank flows, having a lot of links on your home page works to your advantage. Using numbers from Googles original algo,
Assuming every page starts with 1PR, a page passes %85 of its link juice, so if you have 100 links that’s 0.0085 each. To 100 internal pages, making them 1. 0085each , now they all pass back 85% that’s 0.857225 each, x 100 = 85.7225 back to your home page, now we do the sums all over again and again till they numbers stay static. Now this calculation relies on the internal pages having no other links, so you are unlikely to get figures as good as this, but you get the idea.
See link for better explanation.
http://www.webworkshop.net/pagerank.html check out calculator
Remember don’t stuff up your linking stuckture for the users just for the sake of page rank.

I see it as like a golf swing after a lesson, if you try to do what you just learnt too much, you will get all stiff and un-natural, it’s better to swing naturally with what you have learnt in the back of your head.

No I cant see one image blocked being the problem, you should not block images, js or css files that are used on pages that are not blocked, it is not a problem alone, but if there are any other signals of spam, then the fact that you hide these files is then seen as a suspicious signal.
I am not a fan of CMS, as they do not write clean code. I had a look at your site and found many problems. The worst is canonical issues, you home page rank is split between
http://www.amcoexterminating.com/index.php
http://www.amcoexterminating.com
http://amcoexterminating.com/index.php
http://amcoexterminating.com

You need to fix your canonical issues.
http://thatsit.com.au/seo/tutorials/how-to-fix-canonical-domain-name-issues

but the reason you cant find your page in Google is you have a X-robots header of no-index, no-follow. You have a index, follow meta tag, but the header must be overruling it.

If you want to see this for yourself. in IE press F12, select the network tab and start capturing. Load your home page, then click on the home page url in the results and select response headers.

Yes add a filter so that your hits dont count.

click edit next to your domain name

Yes i do, some will argue that each pages stands on its own, but relevancy plays a major part, you wan to be in a relevant link neighborhood, both external and internal

They are not suggesting not to use alt tags, they are saying not to have a picture of your text, have readable text