Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Interesting. This is the first one I've seen, and it's much more obscure than the Olympics.
I'm guessing they use this one to choose what YouTube video to show in one of their info boxes at the top or on the right 
Although on second thought I would expect them to already know which video, and probably which song, is the most popular. I wonder why they're asking then.
I just did s search for Hayley Kiyoko, and Google asked me which song is my favourite from her new album.
Is this a new thing? I've never asked Google a question before and had it ask me something back, other than "did you mean... (the correct spelling for what I was looking for)?"
Thanks Thomas.
AggregateOffer is what I was looking for.
I'm implementing Schema.org, (JSON-LD), on an eCommerce site. Each product has a few different variations, and these variations can change the price, (think T-shirts, but blue & white cost $5, red is $5.50, and yellow is $6).
In my Schema.org markup, (using JSON-LD), in each Product's Offer, I could either have a single Offer with a price range, (minPricd: $5, maxPrice $6), or I could add a separate Offer for each variation, each with its own, correct, price set.
Is one of these better than the other? Why? I've been looking at the WooCommerce code and they seem to do the single offer with a price range, but that could be because it's more flexible for a system that's used by millions of people.
This clears it up
I guess you could consider this a feature request too - I'd love to track more competitors on a campaign. If it came with the next account level it would influence any upgrade decisions we make, (although it's definitely not a 100% if I can track more competitors I'll upgrade).
I'm going to look and see what Open Site Explorer can do for me.
In Moz Pro, I would like to track more than three competitors per campaign. Is this possible, perhaps if I pay more per month?
A workaround would be to set up two campaigns with the same keyword list, but different lists of competitors, but that seems pretty hack-y.
Interesting. I have 2 more thoughts:
If I do a search for "site:globecar.com truck" I see the page, so it's in the index.
However, what are you trying to rank for? Maybe the title should start with "Montreal Truck Rental" instead of "Montreal Truck & 4x4 Pick-Up Rental" - especially if you're trying to rank for the upcoming moving season.
The good news is that on my personalized search results for "montreal truck rental" your Atwater location is the first item in the local 3-pack, however, that might be because I rent cars from you sometimes - when I use the Mozbar to do a non-personalized search using Google.ca in Montreal you don't appear anywhere in the first couple of pages.
Do you have any messages, penalties, or warnings in Google Webmaster Tools?
Will the old pages continue to exist in the WP database? If so, I believe Yoast SEO has a place you can enter a URL to redirect to.
If the old pages will not exist, I prefer to add mod_rewrite RewriteRules to the .htaccess file. This way the webserver redirects the pages without having to initialize WordPress, so it can be a lot faster.
Also, depending on the Post Type WordPress sometimes does this on its own. I know it does for "Post" post types, but I don't know which others. Test your old URLs and see if they're redirecting to the new ones automatically. Make sure to test each kind of URL that has changed - Posts, Pages, Categories, Tags, and any Custom Post Types.
I don't know SEO implications, but if you use a unique URL on each YouTube video it'll be easier to track which ones get more clicks, (assuming Google makes that info available from the URL shortener - I haven't used it).
You could add some more yard/garden-related stuff, especially if you can feature sculptures or metal art similar to what your client is selling, (bonus points if a product she sells is actually used in a garden). If you start now-ish, it's even seasonal!
Is there a good way to avoid it on for a blog that's part of a larger site, (the whole site isn't a blog - and couldn't be powered by a blog CMS like WP - but we have a blog, currently on a subdomain)?
You already have Yoast SEO installed, it can generate sitemaps for you, and I don't think 3500 pages is beyond its ability.
In your WordPress admin, go to SEO > XML Sitemaps, and make sure the XML Sitemap Functionality is Enabled, (the Enabled box should be purple). Once you've done that go through the tabs and turn on/off the parts of the sitemap you want. I would pay special attention to the Post Types tab and make sure any important post types are turned on.
Not that I'm aware of, unfortunately. Patience is an important skill when dealing with Google
I'm not 100% sure I understand the situation - but there are 2 things I think it could be, so here's an idea for each:
Is each page for a specific part? If so, you could put that it the title - for example "Alfa Romeo 156 1997 Piston Heads – Meteco SA"
Is each page for a specific used car that's being sold for parts? If so, what if you have a place to enter a short, (3-5 word), description for each car, then add that to the title somehow? You could also add a slightly longer description to put on the page where you give a little of the car's history or condition, which might also help the customer, (eg, "This alpha romeo has a seized engine"). Edit: it looks like you might already have the description, but I don't read Greek so I'm not 100% sure.
Other than that, maybe a car ID would work - eg, "Car Parts Alfa Romeo 156 1997 #562 – Meteco SA", but I'm not sure if that would help the customers much. How about the date that you got the car? By the time you combine model, year, colour, engine capacity, and date it must be almost unique.
I thought of one other possibility: Your sitemap.xml is probably auto-generated, so this shouldn't be a problem, but check to make sure that the URLs in the sitemap.xml have the www.
Other than that I'm out of ideas - I would wait a few days to see what happens, but maybe someone else with more experience watching Google will have seen this before. If it does resolve, I'd like to know what worked.
I'm not convinced that robots.txt is causing your problem, but it can't hurt to change it back. In fact, while looking for instructions on how to change it I came across this blog post by Joost de Valk, (aka Yoast), that pretty much says you should remove everything that's currently in your robots.txt - and his arguments are right for everything:
If you're using Yoast SEO, here are instructions on how to change the robots.txt file.
I don't know why this is happening, but this is what I would check:
One theory is: When you moved to the non-www version of the site, Google started getting 301s redirecting it from www to non-www, and now that you've gone back to www it's getting 301s redirecting it from from non-www to www, so it's got a circular redirect.
Here's what I would do to try to kick-start indexing, if you haven't already:
Good luck!
That's not so horrible - it just says not to crawl the plugins directory or the admin, and to delay a second between requests. You probably don't want your plugins or admin directories being indexed, and according to this old forum post Google ignores the crawl-delay directive, so the robots.txt isn't the problem.
For more on 301s, read "301 Redirects: The Horror That Cannot Be Uncached." It's not quite true that they can't be uncached, but it's incredibly difficult to do so. From a UI standpoint, if someone has a cottage they like, and has bookmarked the URL, then one day they visit the URL and get a 301, their browser will cache that 301 for months, even if the URL comes back and starts returning a 200 with content.
