How to come up with the best title tags?

[edward-may]

That is awesome Andy, thanks so much!!!!

[ClaytonJ]

Edward

You should have a read of this blog post - considering your international expansion. I am firm believer in the one domain if at all possible concept.

https://moz.com/blog/why-cctlds-should-not-be-an-automatic-choice-for-international-

[PatrickDelehanty]

Hi there

Here are a couple of great resources to help with your title tags:
Title Tag Best Practices (Moz)
Title Tags & SEO: 3 Golden Rules (SEW)

Remember, what you put in the title tags comes down to what your users are searching for. If their intent is not met, they are not going to click. As long as the title is relevant and catches the eyes of the user (and search engines), you will be golden.

Also, don't forget that you could do all the research in the world and Google could change your title tag - just be mindful that that could potentially happen, so don't be discouraged. Same thing with your meta descriptions (here are some great tips on click through rates around meta tags).

Don't overuse keywords or cram as much as you can in. This can come across as spammy and hurt your chances of ranking. Be mindful of length, phrasing, and branding.

Hope this helps! Good luck to you!

[edward-may]

Hey John,

Thanks for the heads up, interesting read: i guess the only thing we are concerned about interms of moving them all to the one domain, .com is that 1 we will loose our current rankings for nz and au. and two there will be some major changes in our development, the site is custom build with payments, international currencies and timezones, internally built amongst all sort of other complicated issues we could possibly have.  I will speak to my developer about it and see what other ways this can be done, but in the past we have considered this a few times and it kinda cause complications with the way we have set up the development which is why we decided to keep the cctlds.  It was a question I posed here a while ago as running 3 sites almost triples the amount of time, and $ so it would be great to bring it down to one.  What is your take on this from that point?

[ClaytonJ]

Edward

The question you face is almost the classic SEO conundrum. Execute the consolidation poorly and you end up losing a lot of rankings and traffic. So it has risks and the first rule is do no harm.

I am what you call a hardliner however. I would consolidate. An eCommerce site doing well www.cottonon.com may be worth viewing. Same issue - global in different markets. One domain. Killing it.

Focusing on one domain long term will have significant benefits.

https://moz.com/blog/2-become-1-merging-two-domains-made-us-an-seo-killing

https://moz.com/blog/rebrand-or-redirect-my-site-consolidate-multiple-sites-whiteboard-friday

That said you have to consider it carefully - map out pro & cons etc. Move slowly and execute brilliantly. Certainly worth keeping on the radar. I would educate myself - talk to more people and then make a decision.

[edward-may]

Hey John

Thanks for the update! Yes our focus is the .com so we want to build that up. However what benefits would there be for merging the other two over to the .com?  I think the earlier we start the better perhaps... ?

It will definitely be something il keep on my radar!

[ClaytonJ]

Benefits are massive. You should be able to focus all your link buildings efforts to one domain - ultimately obtain a higher domain authority. Think of it this way you are now presently dividing your time between three sites. You may even feel guilty working on one site and forgetting the other two.

If you think of your websites like houses. Right now you need to maintain, clean and pay for three houses. Also travel between them. If you make one big house - sure you might have to change some rooms so the New Zealanders feel at home. But it is alot easier being in the same house...  Plus fix one room and it adds value to the whole house...

The big global brands - one big house... lots of great rooms accommodating different cultures.

Hopefully not too esoteric!  ps main benefit long term is Domain authority, time and cost..

[edward-may]

Hey John

Yes your right, the current title tags actually have done the site a world of good. We had to rebrand everything and this is the new site and brand as the site was content thin.  Basically now we are looking at how we can perform better and starting on building the quality of the DA as its quiet low.  But I wanted to focus my efforts on the .com my question for changing the titles would seem that maybe if we did we could do a little better however I think for now its more about creating better links and building up the authority.

My question is #1 Should the H1 be the "online psychic readings" as well

and also i have targeted online psychic readings bc yes its more niche driven but there seem to be really good traffic that come in with that keyword.  Also I have a category page that is directed to "psychic readings" without the online and perhaps I could focus that as the H1 tag instead of on the home page? I hope this makes sense?

[ClaytonJ]

I would have the H1 as you state - "online psychic readings".

And yes on the final paragraph do there later. make sure you use the URL  zenory.com/psychic-readings - has great SEO value.

Backlinks! Backlinks and more quality backlinks!

[edward-may]

Thanks John, you have offered some real value into what I have been considering! Would love to chat more if possible! Working on backlinks at the moment blogger outreach etc