Did Google's Farmer Update Positively/Negatively Affect Your Search Traffic?

[RealSelf]

Rand said it has been added to Webmaster Tools across the board.

[cvos]

Virtually none of our client sites have been affected, and in many cases traccic/ranking have improved. Also noticing continual speed increases in new content being indexed and showing in the SERP's.

[AmitBhawani61]

Hey everyone,

We went through different websites which posted about this Google update and found that a few of our websites got a positive trend in Traffic. Attached is the screen capture [ http://snpr.cm/jYl ] which can help you in getting a clear picture.

I think one good reason for this is the websites which were ranking for long tail key phrases have lot huge traffic and rankings.

jYl

[PCampolo]

Hey RealSelf,

With regard to your meta description problems, have you tried using a NOODP meta tag on affected pages.  I've used this as a successful tactic for years and looks like other have recently tested it's effectiveness..see this most or search for NOODP http://seogadget.co.uk/the-impact-of-noodp-on-titles-in-serps/ .

Hope that helps.

[RealSelf]

Thanks for thinking about it, Stefan.  We did try the NOODP meta tag for 2 months (Jan 4th through last week) and Google seemed to ignore it because they weren't pulling a description from the Open Directory project -- they were pulling users quotes from the page.  We're not listed in the Open Directory...

The approach we've been using since last week where the snippets only show up on rollover has forced Google to accept the meta description but has increased bounce.  So we're going to tweak that further by inserting 1 line of text for each review in the onload event.

We've seen similar meta description problems for our doctor Q&A where Google pulls the doctor's name because it's in a div with class = "author".  We're going to rename that div to discourage Google from picking it up.

[rodnic66]

PRNewswire.com was listed in the original Sistrix post and was indeed hit, though not nearly as badly as their data suggested.  Overall the site is down ~20%.  We're obviously not a content farm, but we do have a ton of content on a vast range of topics, and therefore a very dynamic set of keywords.  We've alerted Google and I have some theories as to why we were targeted, but we're still picking through the data so forgive me for not sharing them until I'm more certain.

Cutt's and Singhal's comments re external testers were fascinating.  If they've really codified qualitative factors that accurately quantify a user's experience on a site/page then that is going to get very interesting.  SEOs will have to grow natty little goatees and start calling themselves Optimization Experience Designers...

[Receptional]

I don't know Teachstreet - but checking my theories/tests, it does fit the model of what has been hit. I took a snippet af exact match content from a Teachstreet directory listing and put it in google: http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q="Get+ready+for+the+SATs,+connect+with+a+math+tutor+or+improve+your+LSAT+score"&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

So what I see is Google taking note of exact;y what it would take note of - trying to put the original source of the content at the top and penalize (ignore) content tat mimicks the original.

[TKSearchGuy]

We definitely saw an impact at www.tradeking.com.  However, the impact (negative) was delayed and appears to be isolated to a few head ("primary") non-branded keywords.  We saw traffic begin to decline on these keywords on March 3rd.  So, it seems like we were impacted more by post-Panda "tweaks" than by the Panda update.

Moreover, our Google ranking for one of these primiary keywords dropped from 5th to 11th (now 12th) on March 3.  Even more interesting:  said keyword had held steady at 5 or 6 since the Vince update.  Prior to the Vince update, our ranking for that keyword had been around 8 or 9 (with some fluctuation).  Effectively, our Vince gains have been lost (for this keyword) and we've lost a few more positions on top of that. Could that be a clue?

8UbQr.png 3qrh0.png sJlWj.png

[daveschappell]

The problem is that those pages are all unique (we are a locally-organized directory of classes and courses) -- to simply change copy to avoid being labeled duplicative, when it's perfectly rational copy for a human seems even 'more' SEO spammy than simply changing what's relevant for humans (i.e. the location-focused words).

I do appreciate the research though -- any ideas on how to alter content for locales?  Wouldn't sites like Yelp get hit for this exact same type of thing?

[yudz]

my UV dropped up to 60% when google panda rolled out world wide..

[anand2010]

Hello,

I recently faced issue of Google recent algo update on my main website. I found my ranks were all of 5th to 7th page even with website name without .com at end we have 5th page shown our biz website. It was a news portal and behind in subdomain i was running my web hosting website.

1. I removed all news content from my website since i thought the news agency send me content send same content to others may cause in the issue so i removed the NEWS AREA

2. I am turn off all of my old subscriptions or membership of blog networks etc. to make sure i get proper good backlinks with good research etc.

Is there anybody who can suggest me what shall i take more action ? Mean any kind of further good suggestion i will highly appreciate if anyone can help me with any suggestions of SEO. I know there are many people who knows lots about it thus i thought to ask to community..

I am also unsure its a Google panelty or a Google recent update negative changes to my website ?

However i have already filled reconsideration request as an possible alternative by explaining google that we are no more NEWS CONTENT Website.

Will wait for responses...

[paddlej]

Is the primary result of a site that rankings fall or are you guys also seeing a drop in the number of indexed pages? or both?

Also, how quickly do you all see sites recovering from this?

[Turkey]

One client (Domain authority 47 ranks for 100s of tough brand related keywords) and had duplicate content on its internal brand pages (the same few 100 words of brand info on each brand page) and was hit badly.

We have other clients in this vertical (Mens designer clothing in UK) , some with duplication have increased in rankings, but they might have a slightly higher Domain Authority 50).

All the ranking drops happened on April 12^th, across all pages which had internal duplication (you can see traffic drops by dissecting brand pages in GA).

We have re written all content and placed it on all pages so there is no internal duplication. All the new content has been there for a month and each page has been cached. No change to our rankings.

Anyone know if the changes they have made have seen any improvements? Surely if this algorithmic then once the algorithm picks up the changes then it re-assesses you and will change your ranking? Surely you can’t now be a ‘marked’ domain???

[Millibit]

I was hit pretty hard at lasr.net, a niche travel site focusing on attractions and events.  While the site has been up for over a decade we are currently down 50% from where we normally are.    We had the same issue of having placeholder pages where users could submit their own attractions, events, etc.  While normally operating around 400k pages indexed, I did notice that we ballooned to over 1 million indexed weeks prior to the farmer update.

On the downside for us, the majority of our pages that ranked very well were original content that had been present on the web for a minimum of 5 years.  

I am aggressive on the site with adsense / advertising as it provides the revenue for site production and I could see those placeholder pages or pages with low content being targeted (not unfairly so) as their ratio was a bit skewed.

Currently we are focusing on reevaluating both on page and off page SEO with a primary push for unique content generation.  In the last month we have seen slow, but steady, growth in search traffic.

[robertdempsey]

All of my affiliate sites held rankings as well as my authority sites. From what I've seen what's worked is:

• Continuously publishing content
• Putting the blog page first (continuously updated)
• Ensuring that Google is aware of my site in Google Webmaster Tools
• So basically building an affiliate site as a "standard" authority site

So no drop in rankings, actually the exact opposite.

[copykatrecipes]

I have had interesting results during the farmer updates, I was originally effect by a downturn of about 40% in traffic, but after about 4 weeks the traffic came back.   In the Panda 2.2 update my page rank slipped from 6 to 5   But I did not loose any traffic despite loosing the page rank.

[mefindcoup]

Our site MeFindCoupon actually advanced from 6-15 page on average to 1-5 for our keywords, we are a new site, but also been doing some SEOseo  it really good.

[polarking]

I have not seen much of a change. Actually if I have to say anything it would be things have improved. Not, working for an agency helps me because I only answer to one person. Reading about people getting hit hard I am curious if their clients have been blowing up their emails and phone asking about the condition of the site. Over optimized sites I guess were hit the hardest. My marketing department started having me get more content on the site prior to the updates. So maybe that had some affect on whether we got hit.

[Nomanali]

SOme positive impact increase in CTR, because after these updates all the spam sites hit down towards and our website get more exposure...