The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Technical SEO Issues
    4. Redundant categorization - "boys" and "girls" category. Any other suggestions than implementing filtering?

    Redundant categorization - "boys" and "girls" category. Any other suggestions than implementing filtering?

    Technical SEO Issues
    3 3 118
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Inevo
      Inevo last edited by

      One of our clients (a children's clothing company) has split their categories (outwear, tops, shoes) between boys and girls - There's one category page for girls outwear, and one category for boys outwear. I am suspecting that this redundant categorisation is diluting link juice and rankings for the related search queries.

      Important points:

      • The clothes themselves are rather gender-neutral, girl's sweaters don't differ that much from the boy's sweaters.
      • Our keyword research indicates that norwegians' search queries are also pretty gender neutral - people are generally searching after "children's dresses", "shoes for kids", "snowsuits", etc. So these gender specific categories are not really reflective of people's search behavior.

      I acknowledge that implementing a filter for "boys" and "girls" would be the best way to solve this redundant categorization, but that would simply be to expensive for our client.

      I'm thinking that some sort of canonicalisation would be the best approach to solve this issue. Are there any other suggestions or comments to this?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DmitriiK
        DmitriiK last edited by

        Hi there.

        Why not do parent category by type of clothing - "snowsuites", "sweaters" and so on and then have boy-girls filters inside?

        Or have clothing categories and have boys-girls filters over everything? This way there is no "issue" with extra or redundant categorization.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • MattAntonino
          MattAntonino last edited by

          "Why not do parent category by type of clothing - "snowsuites", "sweaters" and so on and then have boy-girls filters inside?"

          "I acknowledge that implementing a filter for "boys" and "girls" would be the best way to solve this redundant categorization, but that would simply be to expensive for our client."

          That being said, canonicals will help direct the juice to the right (/outwear/) page and away from /outwear/girls and /outwear/boys.

          The only other option I can see is to have an overview category (/outwear/) and then deindex the subcategories in robots.

          disallow: /outwear/girls*
          disallow: /outwear/boys*

          But that only helps Google with what you already have. If someone directly links the /outwear/boys/ page, that will get lost. So canonicals would seem to be the way to go in the absence of filters.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 1 / 1
          • First post
            Last post
          • Duplicate pages with "/" and without "/"
            Nigel_Carr
            Nigel_Carr
            0
            3
            127

          • Implementation of rel="next" & rel="prev"
            KeriMorgret
            KeriMorgret
            0
            8
            1.4k

          • Need suggestions on what might be causing rankings drop from top5 to "not in 50"?
            Chris661
            Chris661
            0
            6
            117

          • Campaign Issue: Rel Canonical - Does this mean it should be "on" or "off?"
            mrbradleyferguson
            mrbradleyferguson
            0
            4
            230

          • How important is meta content="" name="title"?
            JGar-28032
            JGar-28032
            0
            3
            482

          • Should we use "and" or "&"?
            IPROdigital
            IPROdigital
            0
            9
            3.2k

          • Pagination - rel="next" and rel="prev"
            DigitalJungle
            DigitalJungle
            0
            2
            430

          • I have both a ".net" and a ".com" address for the Same Website.....
            DanDeceuster
            DanDeceuster
            0
            5
            1.2k

          Get started with Moz Pro!

          Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

          Start my free trial
          Products
          • Moz Pro
          • Moz Local
          • Moz API
          • Moz Data
          • STAT
          • Product Updates
          Moz Solutions
          • SMB Solutions
          • Agency Solutions
          • Enterprise Solutions
          • Digital Marketers
          Free SEO Tools
          • Domain Authority Checker
          • Link Explorer
          • Keyword Explorer
          • Competitive Research
          • Brand Authority Checker
          • Local Citation Checker
          • MozBar Extension
          • MozCast
          Resources
          • Blog
          • SEO Learning Center
          • Help Hub
          • Beginner's Guide to SEO
          • How-to Guides
          • Moz Academy
          • API Docs
          About Moz
          • About
          • Team
          • Careers
          • Contact
          Why Moz
          • Case Studies
          • Testimonials
          Get Involved
          • Become an Affiliate
          • MozCon
          • Webinars
          • Practical Marketer Series
          • MozPod
          Connect with us

          Contact the Help team

          Join our newsletter
          Moz logo
          © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
          • Accessibility
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy