The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • My Q&A
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
    2. Categories
    3. Technical SEO Issues
    4. Adding parameters in URLs and linking to a page

    Adding parameters in URLs and linking to a page

    Technical SEO Issues
    5 2 1.7k
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MartinH
      MartinH last edited by

      Hi,

      Here's a fairly technical question:

      We would like to implement badge feature where linking websites using a badge would use urls such as:

      domain.com/page?state=texas&city=houston

      domain.com/page?state=neveda&city=lasvegas

      Important note: the parameter will change the information and layout of the page: domain.com/page

      Would those 2 urls above along with their extra parameters be considered the same page as domain.com/page  by google's crawler?

      We're considering adding the parameter "state" and "city" to Google WMT url parameter tool to tel them who to handle those parameters.

      Any feedback or comments is appreciated!

      Thanks in advance.

      Martin

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ThompsonPaul
        ThompsonPaul last edited by

        You're actually in the reverse position of most people dealing with URL parameters, Martin. By default, the Search Engines consider different parameters to be different pages and most users are struggling with how to make the SEs understand they're all one page to avoid duplicate content issues.

        In your case, you want the SEs to treat those pages according to the way the SEs normally do, which means you "shouldn't" need to do anything extra to get them indexed separately. That's what's naturally going to happen.

        I'm with you on the hinting in Google Webmaster Tools though. May as well use that capability to confirm for Google that you do want those parameters indexed. You should do the same thing in Bing Webmaster Tools as well. Kind of a "belt & suspenders" approach.

        Paul

        MartinH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • MartinH
          MartinH @ThompsonPaul last edited by

          Thank you for your feedback Paul.

          Well, I guess I didn't explained myself correctly because we do want to have all the parameters considered 1 page! 🙂

          Our goal is 2 fold:

          1- Have the parameters in the URL considered 1 page in order to have 1 page with many links pointing to it in order to have higher page authority (instead of 20+ pages with lower authority).

          2- Keep the user experience relevant by display and organizing the page content based on the referring url (in our case the links from badges).

          So in other words how do we (if possible) make sure google and bing consider all parameters as combined page?

          Thanks again!

          Martin

          ThompsonPaul 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ThompsonPaul
            ThompsonPaul @MartinH last edited by

            Sorry for the misunderstanding, Martin. I was misled by this statement:

            ... the parameter will change the information and layout of the page

            If the content of the page will truly be different depending on the parameter, the search engines are probably going to consider them separate URLs no matter what you do.. That's their whole definition of separate pages.

            If the parameter simply rearranges a page's content (e.g. creates a different sort order for the same products) then combining the pages can usually work.

            If you want to try to combine these pages for ranking purposes anyway, the tool to use is the rel=canonical tag. You insert it into the header of the custom parameter pages pointing back to the primary page.

            Google is clear though that canonical tags are taken as suggestions only, and if it thinks your pages should actually be indexed separately, it will ignore the canonical.

            You could then back this process up by using Bing & Google WMT to specify that the ?state= and city= parameters are to be ignored. But the above caveat still applies.

            Paul

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • MartinH
              MartinH last edited by

              Thanks Paul. You confirmed our understanding.

              Another head is always better!

              Thanks again.

              Martin

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post
              • 150+ Pages of URL Parameters - Mass Duplicate Content Issue?
                TomRayner
                TomRayner
                0
                5
                227

              • Canconical tag on site with multiple URL links but only one set of pages
                Linda-Vassily
                Linda-Vassily
                0
                6
                221

              • "One Page With Two Links To Same Page; We Counted The First Link" Is this true?
                Fuel
                Fuel
                0
                5
                407

              • Does adding subcategory pages to an commerce site limit the link juice to the product pages?
                Everett
                Everett
                0
                3
                179

              • Change in url structure - added category page
                evolvingSEO
                evolvingSEO
                0
                4
                818

              • Why are pages linked with URL parameters showing up as separate pages with duplicate content?
                DeanAndrews
                DeanAndrews
                0
                4
                256

              • Does Google pass link juice a page receives if the URL parameter specifies content and has the Crawl setting in Webmaster Tools set to NO?
                Jen_Floyd
                Jen_Floyd
                0
                13
                2.2k

              • Deep Page Link - url no longer exists
                SparkplugDigital
                SparkplugDigital
                0
                5
                1.1k

              Get started with Moz Pro!

              Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

              Start my free trial
              Products
              • Moz Pro
              • Moz Local
              • Moz API
              • Moz Data
              • STAT
              • Product Updates
              Moz Solutions
              • SMB Solutions
              • Agency Solutions
              • Enterprise Solutions
              • Digital Marketers
              Free SEO Tools
              • Domain Authority Checker
              • Link Explorer
              • Keyword Explorer
              • Competitive Research
              • Brand Authority Checker
              • Local Citation Checker
              • MozBar Extension
              • MozCast
              Resources
              • Blog
              • SEO Learning Center
              • Help Hub
              • Beginner's Guide to SEO
              • How-to Guides
              • Moz Academy
              • API Docs
              About Moz
              • About
              • Team
              • Careers
              • Contact
              Why Moz
              • Case Studies
              • Testimonials
              Get Involved
              • Become an Affiliate
              • MozCon
              • Webinars
              • Practical Marketer Series
              • MozPod
              Connect with us

              Contact the Help team

              Join our newsletter
              Moz logo
              © 2021 - 2026 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
              • Accessibility
              • Terms of Use
              • Privacy