Superficial content with little or no added value

[stroke]

This post is deleted!

[MattRoney]

Hi there!

I think it might help a bit if we knew a bit more about what you're asking. Perhaps more information about the overhaul, and exactly what kind of help you're looking for?

Thank you!

[KeriMorgret]

I think there's more information in this earlier post that may help:

http://moz.com/community/q/superficial-content-with-little-or-no-added-value

[stroke]

Hello,

The help understand why google gave me this penalty.

If I did a review by copyscape tool, and still not resolved.

I wanted to understand the google problem to be able to fix.

I thought it was some short stories that were duplicated by readers, but deleted all, not solved.

What is wrong with the site?

Thanks

[stroke]

Yes, this topic was myself I opened, but there from what I understand, the problem is embed videos from other sites and I'm working to resolve it.

But here these sites are text and does not embed.

Thanks

[EricaMcGillivray]

Hi,

I took a quick look at your site, and it appears that you have a problem with category pages. When I took the following text from your site's homepage -- "Minha esposa trabalha como manicure. Tá sempre trabalhando no salão ou atendendo nas residências. Faz tempo que trabalha num salão perto de casa" -- and searched Google, it found 3 instances of it.

http://www.acervodecontos.com/
http://www.acervodecontos.com/diversos/
http://www.acervodecontos.com/busca-contos-sexo/esposa-recem-casada-liberada/2/

All were category level pages. The good news, is this is a pretty common problem for lots of sites, which means there's been a ton written about it. My suggestion would be to noindex those secondary category pages if you aren't going to put unique content on them. Here's a discussion from a similar Q&A post that adds great insight.