Determining When to Break a Page Into Multiple Pages?

[ProjectLabs]

Suppose you have a page on your site that is a couple thousand words long. How would you determine when to split the page into two and are there any SEO advantages to doing this like being more focused on a specific topic. I noticed the Beginner's Guide to SEO is split into several pages, although it would concentrate the link juice if it was all on one page.

Suppose you have a lot of comments. Is it better to move comments to a second page at a certain point? Sometimes the comments are not super focused on the topic of the page compared to the main text.

[danatanseo]

Google did some user testing on this topic, to find out if users preferred longer pages or paginated pages. According to their research, users preferred longer pages because there is always latency when moving from one page to the next. Here's the video where a Googler cites that research: http://youtu.be/njn8uXTWiGg  If you want to have it both ways, you could always break your content into pages, but put a "View All" option at the top. Personally, I am one of those folks who doesn't mind scrolling down through comments. If given the choice to continue on to a second page of comments, I probably wouldn't.

From an SEO standpoint, provided the pagination is handled properly, I don't think there's an advantage one way or the other, unless you take into consideration that your bounce rate could potentially go up with paginated pages. Even if it did though, I doubt that would significantly hurt you from an overall SEO viewpoint.

[larry.kim]

A few years ago there was a benefit of breaking up a document into smaller chunks - say, for every h2 (second level headings) The idea was that rather than having one big document, you could have lots of small ones to rank on all your h2's. And it seemed to work pretty well. Today, I'm finding that the content that does the best from an seo perspective is my longest content. And that the big content does way better than the sum of the parts. So, I would no longer recommend chunking up your articles, unless they're just too long to read. Some of my best articles have 2-3 thousand words. I also find a nice correlation between number of comments and my best posts. So I leave them all on the same page, making it super long. For some examples of super long content that are doing great from an seo perspective, check out the group interviews on my site (wordstream.com). Those articles have +10 minutes on the page on average and generate tons of traffic for my site. Google these for example: Ppc bid management guide, Importance of ab testing, (etc.)

[EGOL]

I want to address this question from a couple of perspectives....

USERS:  As Dana said... Users prefer single long pages.   These long pages with lots of content, lots of subtopics and lots of images are impressive when a person lands on them.  That immediately shows them the depth and richness of your content and they can quickly scan your subheadings to see what you have to offer.  These will more readily produce likes, tweets, links, etc. when compared to broken pages.

SEO:  I have experimented with long and multiple short pages.  I get more traffic from long pages because of the diversity of words that they contain.  This brings in LOTS more long tail traffic.  And, if visitors are liking, tweeting and linking you might get more search traffic.

MONETIZATION:  This is a downside if you are showing ads.  You get fewer impressions and if there is a limit on the number of ads you can display per page your ad density will be lower and thus less income.  However, if your traffic is higher from the increased long tail and better rankings then you might recover the lost impressions per visitor with more visitors.