Implementation of rel="next" & rel="prev"

[NDAY]

Hi All,

I'm looking to implement rel="next" & rel="prev", so I've been looking for examples. I looked at the source code for the MOZ.com forum, if anyone one is going to do it properly MOZ are.

I noticed that the rel="next" & rel="prev" tags have been implemented in the a href tags that link to the previous and next pages rather than in the head. I'm assuming this is fine with Google but in their documentation they state to put the tags in the . Does it matter?

Neil.

[mihaiaperghis]

Hey Neil,

The pagination tags do have to be implemented in the section to be properly recognized by Google. Maile Ohye confirmed this aspect.

As for an example, here's one I gave to a previous related question: http://moz.com/community/q/pagination-for-product-page-reviews

Hope this helps!

[NDAY]

Very Helpful,

Thanks Mihal,

That's what I thought, after reading and watching Maile's video. Does this mean I've spotted a mistake by MOZ??

Neil.

[mihaiaperghis]

No problem!

I don't know exactly where Moz uses pagination, so can't really tell.

However, using rel=next/prev in the anchor tag is allowed as well as defined by w3.org, it's just that Google won't take those into consideration because, as Maile says, "we’re concerned that links in the section make it possible for spammers to find less secure user-generated content (UGC) sites and then inject irrelevant links totally unbeknownst to the webmaster".

[RuthBurrReedy]

You've stumbled into a test we were running! Yes, putting it in the is the methodology recommended by Google - we were testing to see if having it in the anchor would work as well (looks like no, it doesn't). We're often running tests of this type so just because you see us doing something, doesn't necessarily mean it's the 100% best way to do it! You're better off reading the blog and Learn SEO sections for best practices information. Good catch!

[NDAY]

Thanks Ruth.

Good to know I was on the right track.

[Jon_bangonline]

Hi Ruth,

If we currently have rel=canonical tags on our pages but will be implementing rel=”next” and rel=”prev”, should we remove the existing rel=canonical tags?

Thanks for your help

Freddy

[KeriMorgret]

We have a good post on pagination right now on YouMoz at http://moz.com/ugc/seo-guide-to-google-webmaster-recommendations-for-pagination, which could be a good place to ask that quesiton.