Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Happy to help. All the best, tom

Agree Google+ works pretty fast (Bonus points if it gets shared) Have a high profile website share it Twitter still works pretty well, (Bonus points if it gets shared) Be sure it's in your xml sitemap, resubmit the sitemap to Google Install Google Analytics Bookmark it on Delicious If it's a blogpost, register your blog with feedburner

Good answer cheers Tom !

It's good. I recommend it highly.

Using 2 SEO plugins can actually create conflicts with duplicate tags. Yoast SEO plugin does it all for you and it is highly recommended. But about your question, disabling the plugin won't delete the configuration (I think), so you can basically re-activate it later and have everything as it was. Removing/deleting the files of the plugin most likely will remove the configuration, but you if you are using another plugin, such as yoast, you should be good. Make sure to review the entire configuration of whatever plugin you use. Hope that helps!

The best post/information I came across was what Geoff has written here: http://moz.com/blog/site-speed-are-you-fast-does-it-matter Under How important is Site Speed? In two words summary of Google and Matt Cutts reply is that its a factor, but a very small factor of the many factors involved in rankings. I am also interested in this question as much as you are, but in my efforts I haven't seen a noticeable change in rankings just solely related to speed, this includes TTFB and other speed improvements. Having said that. TTFB and overall speed optimization is important in conversions on your site and ultimately in providing better user experience, which is always really important. This leads to another question that you can ask, did improving TTFB improve conversions, or lower bounce rate, etc? This also is a great question, that I am curious in as well.  From my end I did not have a client that was that worried, or had a horrable TTFB that I could measure and notice a difference, but very interested if someone had this effect Hope this helps

We got amazed what we read.(What is written by YOU) Thanks for valuable blog post Frutiko Team

Can Moz weigh in on this please? There is a lot of really  good discussion on this particular topic across multiple threads but no clear direction. What does Moz recommend and why? The why is important and here's why. If I have a client with an established blog that uses the blog.domain versus domain/blog structure, should I be recommending they migrate to a different structure?

Thanks, I think I'll just leave these for now as it's only three sub categories that have the 'tripling up' of links.  Appreciate you both taking the time to reply.

Great video too... Highly recommend

Joshua, It's my experience that Google disregards punctuation of that sort, however, I'd use both of them on the page.  I'd use "inches" in your written description of the product and the " in the technical spects of the product.

If you include any links in your comments, Google may crawl them, although they won't pass any link juice. Google is pretty aggressive above spidering any links they find, including unlinked URLs on a page and URLs in javascript, so I wouldn't be surprised if they crawled links in comments as well.

Awesome. Thanks so much for the help Rand and Lesley.

The post is a couple of years old, but it's what Dr. Pete himself (the author of the post) refers to when asked about this in Q&A.

I think that's a good summation Mat. It's not going to add any "SEO" value at all, but it might be useful for users. If so, great; If not, don't do it.

Thanks for commenting Mike Definately intend to mix it up a bit but just wanted to check by how much/needed to avoid potential dupe issues. But yes will try and tailor it for G+ users so slightly different messaging and not a fax of the home page cheers dan

Thank you mrcensorious, That makes sense and should be pretty easy to do. Thanks for your time.

You're very welcome

Hi Switch, thanks for your question! Chris is correct in that it is best practice to keep your title brief and readable, with your keyword on the front end and your brand name on the back end. I personally feel that separating the page/article title from the brand name makes the tag easier to read. As Google now truncates title tags based on the total width of the characters (vs. the number of characters), I prefer using the pipe separator for this purpose. Hope that helps!

Sounds like nonsense to me, do they give any evidence to back this up? I cant see how you can dilute a keyword, besides linking out with the keyword. The reason people like to keep to one keyword per page, is that there is only one page title, one H1(should be only one), one url, not because more then one will dilute the other, and especially in your case, I cant see how the same keyword can dilute itself. Don't keyword stuff of cause, but you are far from doing that.