Questions
-
Iframes & SEO
If it's for design only, why not use a div with a defined height and set to scroll? Then you get full seo benefits as well.
Technical SEO Issues | | seopet0 -
Keywords in file names vs folder names
The short answer is, it does not matter. The recommendation I would make is to use what some people refer to as "technology-proof" URLs. Drop the file extension. Why? it looks cleaner and nicer to users it makes it a bit harder (more work) for someone who wants to hack your site as they are unsure of your page's language it gives you the flexibility to change technologies without requiring a new URL (from html to php for example) The only difference between your URLs then would be the trailing slash. It is a matter of personal preference but I add the trailing slash to indicate a folder, and no slash to indicate it is a file. Matt Cutts has a couple videos on URLs and file names which you may enjoy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRzMhlFZz9I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=971qGsTPs8M
Technical SEO Issues | | RyanKent0 -
Meta tags question - imagetoolbar
What I can recall from Matt Cutts is that Google is pretty much ignoring all meta tags besides the 'description' one. Given the fact that I've never even heard of this one, I think it is pretty save to assume it is of no value (atleast to search engines).
Technical SEO Issues | | Theo-NL0 -
Use of Meta Tag - MSSmartTagsPreventParsing
The tag is to prevent Microsoft Smart Tags from rendering. It was only included in beta versions of IE6, and no other browsers since. It's not worth including; you can safely delete these tags. An explanation of smart tags on wikipedia. The same question on stackoverflow.
Technical SEO Issues | | john4math0 -
Canonical tag for home page
Ryan is absolutely right. also adjust your .htaccess to link to either index.html of mysite.com/ RewriteRule ^.*/index.html http://www.mysite.com [R=301,L] Or RewriteRule ^.*/ http://www.mysite.com/index.html [R=301,L] Hope this helps
On-Page / Site Optimization | | JarnoNijzing0